The global economic crisis and the subjective well-being in Southern and Central Eastern Europe
Keywords:
global economic crisis, Easterlin paradox, satisfaction with life, happiness, Southern and Central Eastern EuropeAbstract
From 2008, we have been witnessing an economic phenomenon which has been shaking capitalism and which has serious economic, political, and social consequences. Some of the problems that occurred included a panic on financial markets, media hysteria, rising unemployment, loss of homes by millions of people, chain bankruptcies, anti-Wall Street demonstrations in the United States of America, anti-government protests and anti-EU street protests in many European countries, and a debt crisis in some of the Southern European and Central Eastern European economies. What is the effect of this major economic event on the subjective well-being of Southern and Central Eastern Europeans? The ‘Easterlin paradox’ suggests that there is no link between society’s economic development and its average level of happiness. I re-assessed this paradox by analysing multiple rich datasets from the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS 2007–2008 and EQLS 2011–2012). I selected several countries both from Southern and Central Eastern Europe: Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Croatia, Macedonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. Using a multiple linear regression analysis, I tested the influence of different economic indicators (GDP per capita in PPS, long-term unemployment rate, Corruption Perceptions Index, Gini coefficient, absolute and relative income), social indicators (religious participation and self-perceived health) and socio-demographic variables (gender, age, marital status, education, size of place of residence) on both the cognitive (satisfaction with life) and the hedonic (happiness) component of subjective well-being. My conclusion is that GDP per capita is not a significantpredictor of neither life satisfaction nor happiness. The main predictors of satisfaction with life are the perceived standard of living, health, marital status, education level, and religious church attendance. The main predictors of happiness are the perceived standard of living, health, marital status, and education level.
Downloads
References
Bãltãtescu S., 2007, Banii n-aduc fericirea? Influenta venitului asupra bunãstãrii subiective în România post-decembristã, [in:] Culturã, dezvoltare, identitate. Perspective actuale, eds. F. Chipea, I. Cioarã, A. Hatos, M. Marian, C. Sas, Expert Publishing House, Bucharest.
Deaton A., 2012, The Financial Crisis and the Well-Being of Americans, Oxford Economic Papers, no. 64.
Di Tella R., MacCullogh R., Oswald A., 2001, The Macroeconomics of Happiness, Warwick Research Papers, no. 615.
Diener E., Tay L., Oishi S., 2013, Rising Income and the Subjective Well-Being of Nations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, no. 2.
Easterlin R., 1974, Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence, [in:] Nations and Households in Economic Growth, eds. P. David, M. Reder, Academic Press, New York.
Easterlin R., 1995, Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, no. 1.
Easterlin R., 2004, The Economics of Happiness, Daedalus, no. 2.
Easterlin R., McVey L., Switek M., Sawangfa O., Zweig J., 2010, The Happiness-Income Paradox Revisited, PNAS, no. 52.
EUI, [n.d.], European University Institute, Constitutional Change through Euro Crisis Law, Romania, http://eurocrisislaw.eui.eu/romania/ [access: 12.08.2016].
Eurofound, [n.d.], European Quality of Life Surveys (EQLS), http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/qualityoflife/eqls/index [access: 04.02.2016].
Fischer C., 2008, What Wealth–Happiness Paradox? A Short Note on the American Case, Journal of Happiness Studies, no. 9.
Hagerty M., Veenhoven R., 2003, Wealth and Happiness Revisited: Growing National Income Does go with Greater Happiness, Social Indicators Research, no. 1.
Inglehart R., Foa R., Peterson C., Welzel C., 2008, Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007), Perspectives in Psychological Science, no. 4.
Olah Ô., 2013, Oameni Õi organizaÛii. O introducere în studiul comportamentului organizaÛional, Eikon Publishing House, Cluj-Napoca.
Reinhart C., Rogoff K., 2009, This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press, Pricenton.
Samuelson P., Nordhaus W., 2000, Economie politicã, Teora Publishing House, Bucharest.
Stevenson B., Wolfers J., 2008, Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 14282.
Sacks D., Stevenson B., Wolfers J., 2012, The New Stylized Facts about Income and Subjective Well-Being, IZA Discussion Paper no. 7105.
UKDS, [n.d.], UK Data Service Discover, European Quality of Life Survey, https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/?sn=200013 [access: 12.08.2016].
Veenhoven R., Hagerty M., 2006, Rising Happiness in Nations 1946–2004: A reply to Easterlin, Social Indicators Research, no. 79.
Voinea L., 2009, SfârÕitul economiei iluziei. Crizã Õi anticrizã. O abordare heterodoxã, Publica Publishing House, Bucharest.
Academic Scientific Journals
