Integrating Core Maritime Ports in Gdynia and Koper with TENT-T Baltic -Adriatic Corridor Infrastructure


  • Dorota Książkiewicz University of Gdańsk
  • Michał Tuszyński Port of Gdynia



maritime ports, TEN-T, TEN-T network, Baltic-Adriatic corridor, transport infrastructure, transport policy


Maritime ports are key elements of transport TEN-T system. As the volume of cargo processed by ports in TENT-T network is rising, it is necessary develop ports’ infrastructure to accommodate rising cargo flows. Gateway ports as Gdynia or Koper seize the opportunity to become more competitive by adapting to international infrastructure standards. The precondition for existence and for successful development ofaport is to offer seamless connection with the hinterland and overseas markets, therefore both ports have been putting effort in developing ports’ infrastructure along with hinterland and overseas connections. The goal of the article is to analyse the trends infrastructure development in gateway ports of Gdynia located in the Baltic-Adriatic TENT-T transport corridor and their plans for further integration with the core TENT-T network.


Download data is not yet available.


UNCTAD (2019a) Port liner shipping connectivity index, annual.[Accessed 11th Oct. 2019].

UNCTAD (2019b) Maritime Country Profile, [Accessed 5.11.2019].

European Commission (2011), White Paper “Roadmap to a Single European transport Area –Towards a competitive and resources efficient transport system [Accessed 29.09.2019].

Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU [Accessed 20.09.2019].

European Comission (2014), Port. Gateways for the Trans European Transport Network 2030 ttps:// [Accessed 20.11.2019].

European Commission (2018a) Motorways of the Seas. Detailed Implementation Plan of the European Coordinator, DG Move, [Accessed 19.11.2019].

Merk O, Notteboom T, Port Hinterland Connectivity, Discussion Paper 12, International Trans-port Forum, OECD, 2015. [Accessed 15.11.2019].

European Commission (2015), Report of the exchange of views between ports CEOs and Transport Commissioner Bulc, [Accessed 19.11.2019].

European Parliament (2008), The Evolving Role of EU Seaports in Global Maritime Logistics – Capacities, Challenges and Strategies, European Parliament, Policy Department B, Structural and Cohesion Policies. file:///C:/Users/ssile/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/BA3008765ENC.en%20(1).pdf [Accessed 20.11.2019].

ESPO (2019), PRIORITIES OF EUROPEAN PORTS FOR 2019 – 2024 What ports do for Europe What Europe do for ports Memorandum of the European Sea Ports Organisation for thenew Commission andEuropean Parliament,, [Accessed 20.11.2019].

TENTacle project, (2019a), Pilot action plan: Gdynia CNC urban/transport node, [Accessed 20.10.2019].

TENTacle project, (2019b), The last mile study for the Gdynia TEN- T core network transport node, corresponding to the investments coherent with the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor Work Plan, WYG International, [Accessed 20.10.2019].

European Commission (2018b) Baltic – Adriatic Third Work Plan of the European Coordinator Kurt Bodewig, DG Move, Brussels, 2018. [Accessed 15.11.2019].

NIK (2018), Informacja o wynikach kontroli, Infrastruktura dostępowa do portów morskich, [Accessed 10.11.2019].

Luka Koper (2019), Construction works for the garage has started, [Accessed 20.11.2019].

European Commission (2018c), EU Investment in Transport in Slovenia, [Accessed 10.11.2019].

European Commission (2018d), CEF support to Baltic-Adriatic Corridor [Accessed 5.10.2019].

European Commission (2019), Investing in European networks. Five years supporting European infrastructure, [Accessed 12.11.2019].

Luka-Koper, Port of Koper, [Accessed 10.11.2019].




How to Cite

Książkiewicz , D. ., & Tuszyński , M. . (2019). Integrating Core Maritime Ports in Gdynia and Koper with TENT-T Baltic -Adriatic Corridor Infrastructure. Transport Economics and Logistics, 84, 41–58.