Academic Scientific JournalsSuccess factors for the development of urban bike systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/etil.2019.84.08Keywords:
success factors, city bike systems, transport innovations, sustainable urban mobility, endogenous factors, exogenous factorsAbstract
City bike systems are an important element of sustainable urban mobility. The first concept appeared in the world in the second half ofthe20th century and since then the popularity of this form of transport has been growing all the time. The development of public bicycle systems increases cycling mobility. In recent years, systems have changed constantly, adapting to the needs of users. More and more advanced technological solutions are being introduced and they force continuous development and verification of previous assumptions. The high popularity of city bike systems has influenced the interest of researchers in measuring their success. The basis for creating the classification should be striving to meet the transport needs of potential system users and expectations related to new means of transport.
Downloads
References
Botsman R., Rogers R., 2011. What’s min eis yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live, Harper Collins Publishers, London.
Burnewicz J., 2013. Nouvelles mobilités et villes intelligentes en Pologne, l’Observatoire des Politiques et des Stratégies de Transport en Europe, Paris.
Chalfen M., Kamińska J., 2016. Analiza wykorzystania roweru miejskiego we Wrocławiu, Autobusy, nr 6.
Dąbrowski M, Fall M., 2015. Jak rowery miejskie tworzą „smart cities” [w:] Biała Księga Mobilności, Nextbike, Stowarzyszenie Transportu Publicznego, Transport Publiczny, http://transport-publiczny.pl/BKM/BialaKsiegaMobilnosci2015.pdf (accessed 3 October 2019).
Daddio D. W., 2012. Maximizing Bikesharing: An Empirical Analysis of Capital Bikeshare Usage, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Dębowska-Mróz M., Kacprzak M., Zięba P., 2016. Infrastruktura rowerowa jako element systemu transportowego Radomia, Autobusy, nr 12.
Drucker P., 2000. Zarządzanie w XXI wieku, Muza S.A., Warszawa.
EU Consult, 2016. Koncepcja budowy systemu Szczecińskiego Roweru Metropolitalnego. http://www.zit-som.szczecin.pl/images/dokumenty/Koncepcja_budowy_SRM.pdf (accessed 14 October 2019).
EU Consult, 2016. Studium koncepcyjne Systemu Roweru Metropolitalnego dla Obszaru Metropolitalnego Gdańsk – Gdynia – Sopot. http://www.metropoliagdansk.pl/upload/files/Studium_koncepcyjne_SRMOMGGS%20wersja%204_0.pdf (accessed 14 October 2019).
Fishman E., Washington S., Haworth N., Watson A., 2015. Factors influencing bicycle share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane, Transportation Research Record, vol. 71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.021.
Olson J., Goff P., Simms S., 2011. City of Providence Bicycle Share Feasibility Study Final Report,Design for City of ProvidenceOptimising Bike Sharing in European Cities, 2011. http://mobility-workspace.eu/wp-content/uploads/OBIS_Handbook_PL.pdf (accessed 27 October 2019).
Pai J. T., Pai S. Y., 2015. User Behaviour Analysis of the Public Bike System in Taipei, International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, vol. 3, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.3.2_39.
Penc-Petrzak I., 2010. Planowanie strategiczne w nowoczesnej firmie, Wolters Kluwer, WarszawaPolska na rowery, 2011. http://polskanarowery.sport.pl/msrowery/1,105126,10706963, Rower_miejski___dlaczego_jednym_sie_udaje__a_innym.html (accessed 1 October 2019).
Portal samorządowy, 2014. http://www.portalsamorzadowy.pl/gospodarka-komunalna/system-wypozyczalni-rowerow-musi-byc-dopasowany-do-miasta,60536.html (accessed 14 October 2019).
Shaheen S. A., Martin E. W., Chan N. D., Cohen A. P., Pogodzinski M., 2014. Public Bikesharingin North America during a Period of Rapid Expansion: Understanding Business Models, Industry Trends and User Impacts, Mineta Transportation Institute.
Transport publiczny, 2016. http://www.transport-publiczny.pl/wiadomosci/kopenhaga-rowerow-wiecej-niz-samochodow-53492.html (accessed 14 October 2019).
Transport publiczny, 2017. http://www.transport-publiczny.pl/wiadomosci/wavelo-kontra-veturilo-dwa-pomysly-na-placenie-za-rower-54490.html (accessed 24 October 2019).
Warczak M., 2015. Endogeniczne i egzogeniczne czynniki rozwoju gospodarczego z perspektywy finansów gminy, Współczesna Gospodarka, vol. 6, nr 4, pp. 111-122.
