Researching researchers: exploring the challenges of conducting research during a pandemic

Autor

Słowa kluczowe:

research assistants, COVID-19 pandemic, phenomenology, thematic analysis, qualitative research

Abstrakt

Background:
Research assistants (RAs) are vital for the successful completion of research. When data collection and recruitment are dis-rupted, like during the COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying restrictions, the effects on RAs attempting to conduct re-search are unclear.

Participants and procedure:
This study explored RAs’ perspectives of conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Five RAs who had begun collecting data at a mid-western children’s hospital on how a robot named MEDi® could help patients uphold health and safety procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results:
Thematic analysis of the interview data identified four key themes (and sub-themes) that reflected RAs’ experiences of con-ducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic: inspiration and motivation; research barriers; human connections and relationships; and creativity and problem-solving. The first theme focused on the sources of RAs’ inspiration and motivation to participate in research; the second focused on the barriers that affected data collection and recruitment. The third theme described the impact that human connections and relationships had on the success of the research, and the final theme explored the RAs’ creativity and problem-solving approaches, which aided in navigating the challenges faced during the pandemic. The RAs overcame the challenges with positive attitudes, creativity, and collaboration.

Conclusions:
Overall, the results reveal how the RAs explored creative strategies to adapt research methods to suit unanticipated circum-stances and develop interpersonal skills to facilitate participation in future research and career activities.

Downloads

Bibliografia

Alberta Health Services (2022, August 19). Family/ designated support person and visitors of patients: COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/topics/Page17001.aspx.

Aksoy, H., Ayhan B. D., Fidancı, İ., Arsava, E. Y., & Cankurtaran, M. (2021). Family medicine research assistants’ experiences during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 75, e13975. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp. 13975.

Anwar, N. H., & Viqar, S. (2017). Research assistants, reflexivity, and the politics of fieldwork in urban Pakistan. Area, 49, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/ area.12307.

Beran, T. N., Pearson, J. R., & Lashewicz, B. (2021). Implementation of a humanoid robot as an innovative approach to child life interventions in a children’s hospital: Lofty goal or tangible reality? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 639394. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639394.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/ 10.4135/9781452230153.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Phenomenological research. In H. Salmon, J. Scappini, C. Pearson, & L. Larson (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed., pp. 75–82). Sage.

Farrier, C. E., Pearson, J. D. R., & Beran, T. N. (2020). Children’s fear and pain during medical procedures: a quality improvement study with a humanoid robot. The Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52, 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0844562119862742.

Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.

Kaplan, L., Kuhnt, J., & Steinert, J. I. (2020). Do no harm? Field research in the global south: Ethical challenges faced by research staff, World Development, 127, 104810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104810.

Larkin, M., Flowers, P., & Smith, J. A. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory method and research (2nd ed.). Sage.

Mehta, U. M., Venkatasubramanian, G., & Chandra, P. S. (2020). The “mind” behind the “mask”: Assessing mental states and creating therapeutic alliance amidst COVID-19. Schizophrenia Research, 222, 503–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.033.

Mitchell, K., Rekiere, J., & Grassley, J. S. (2020). The influence of undergraduate research assistant experiences on future nursing roles. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36, 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.profnurs.2019.09.006.

Naufel, K. Z., & Beike, D. R. (2013). The ethical treatment of research assistants: Are we forsaking safety for science? Journal of Research Practice, 9, M11.

Nelson, P., & Petrova, M. G. (2022). Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship. Learned Publishing, 35, 423–427. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/leap.1467.

Nguyen, P., Scheyvens, R., Beban, A., & Gardyne, S. (2022). From a distance: The ‘new normal’ for researchers and research assistants engaged in remote fieldwork. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160 94069221089108.

Reiners, G. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing & Care, 1, 119. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167- 1168.1000119.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

Shadmi, E., Chen, Y., & Dourado, I. (2020). Health equity and COVID-19: Global perspectives. International Journal of Equity Health, 19, 104. https://doi. org/10.1186/s12939-020-01218-z

Southerton, C., Clark, M., Watson, A., & Lupton, D. (2022). The future of qualitative research in the COVID-19 era: Experimenting with creative and digital methods. In S. Matthewman (Ed.), A research agenda for COVID-19 and society (pp. 155–174). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800 885141.00016.

Ten Hulzen, R. D., & Fabry, D. A. (2020). Impact of hearing loss and universal face masking in the COVID-19 era. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 95, 2069– 2072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.027.

Tremblay, S., Castiglione, S., Audet, L. A., Desmarais, M., Horace, M., & Peláez, S. (2021). Conducting qualitative research to respond to COVID-19 challenges: Reflections for the present and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679.

Zhou, T., Law, R., & Lee, P. C. (2022). What motivates me? Motivation to conduct research of academics in teaching-oriented universities in China. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure Sport, & Tourism Education, 31, 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100392.

Opublikowane

2024-12-18

Jak cytować

Onuoha, O., Lorenzetti, D., Pearson, J., Lee, B., & Beran, T. (2024). Researching researchers: exploring the challenges of conducting research during a pandemic. Health Psychology Report, 12(4), 275–285. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/HPR/article/view/12065

Numer

Dział

Artykuły