Motivation factors for sustainable investment in Germany – a generational comparison

Autor

  • Timo Pascal Klouth University of Gdańsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/ibage.2023.42.03

Słowa kluczowe:

sustainable, investments, generation

Abstrakt

Amidst the growing global environmental issues, sustainable investment is gaining significance. This study examines the correlation between generational dynamics and preferences for sustainable investment in Germany. Employing the generational approach, the analysis explores how traditionalists, baby boomers, generation X and generation Y perceive and utilize sustainable investment opportunities. The research indicates a significant generational divide in the acceptance of sustainable finance. Millennials and generation X show a higher propensity for such investments compared to baby boomers and traditionalists. The study explores the motivational factors that influence investment decisions in different generations and uncovers different patterns that shape attitudes towards sustainable finance. Participants from previous generations prioritise long-term financial returns, while millennials and generation X show a stronger preference for impact investing that aligns with sustainability goals. Additionally, baby boomers and traditionalists show less inclination towards sustainable investment and emphasise financial returns and incentives over sustainability concerns. These findings highlight the significance of customizing strategies to involve various generational cohorts in sustainable finance initiatives. By comprehending the distinct motivations and preferences of each generation, stakeholders can create specific interventions to promote wider participation in sustainable investing and establish a more inclusive and environmentally aware financial landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Berkup S.B., 2014, Working with generations X And Y in generation Z period: Management of different generations in business life, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, no. 19, doi. org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n19p218.

Chițimiea A., Minciu M., Manta A.-M., Ciocoiu C.N., Veith C., 2021, The drivers of green investment: A bibliometric and systematic review, Sustainability, no. 6, doi.org/10.3390/su13063507.

Dornseifer F., 2022, Bundesverband Alternative Investment eV, bvai.de/newsletter-v/2022 [access: 9.10.2023]. Google Trends, n.d., Nachhaltigkeit, trends.google.de/trends/explore?date=all&- geo=DE&q=Nachhaltigkeit [access: 30.06.2022].

Han S.-R., Li P., Xiang J.-J., Luo X.-H., Chen C.-Y., 2020, Does the institutional environment influence corporate social responsibility? Consideration of green investment of enterprises – evidence from China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, no. 29, doi.org/10.1007/ s11356-020-09559-6.

Haunss S., Sommer M. (eds.), 2020, Fridays for Future: Die Jugend gegen den Klimawandel: Konturen der weltweiten Protestbewegung, Transcript, Bielefeld. International Finance Corporation, 2021, Investing for impact: The global impact investing market 2020, doi.org/10.1596/36263.

Klaffke M. (ed.), 2014, Generationen-Management: Konzepte, Instrumente, Good-Practice-Ansätze, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden.

Klouth T., 2023, LinkedIn survey post summary, linkedin.com/analytics/post-summary/ urn:li:activity:7033805930269929472 [access: 10.05.2023].

Knigge B., 2021, Fridays for Future: Was hat die Klimaschutzbewegung bisher erreicht?, ardalpha.de/wissen/umwelt/klima/klima-fridays-for-future-planetb-bilanz-100.html [access: 21.11.2024].

Lehmphul K., 2022, Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland, umweltbundesamt.de/themen/ nachhaltigkeit-strategien-internationales/umweltbewusstsein-in-deutschland [access: 12.07.2022].

Raghunandan A., Rajgopal S., 2022, Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments?, Review of Accounting Studies, no. 3, doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09693-1.

Reyhanloo T., Baumgärtner S., Haeni M., Quatrini S., Saner P., Lindern E. von, 2018, Private-sector investor’s intention and motivation to invest in land degradation neutrality, PLOS ONE, no. 12, doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208813.

Schnetzer S., 2022, Generation XYZ Definition, Merkmale und Unterschiede verständlich erklärt, simon-schnetzer.com/generation-xyz [access: 24.07.2022].

Thanki H., Shah S., Rathod H.S., Oza A.D., Burduhos-Nergis D.D., 2022, I am ready to invest in socially responsible investments (SRI) options only if the returns are not compromised: Individual investors’ intentions toward SRI, Sustainability, no. 18, doi.org/10.3390/su141811377.

Vicente-Molina M. A., Fernández-Sainz A., Izagirre-Olaizola J., 2018, Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students, Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 176, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079.

World Economic Forum, 2021, The Global Risks Report, weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf [access: 21.11.2024].

zeb, Morningstar, 2022, European Sustainable Investment Funds Study 2022, zeb-consulting.com/ en-DE/press/european-sustainable-investment-funds-study-2022 [access: 21.11.2024].

Opublikowane

2023-11-26

Jak cytować

Klouth, T. P. (2023). Motivation factors for sustainable investment in Germany – a generational comparison. International Business and Global Economy, (42), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.26881/ibage.2023.42.03

Numer

Dział

Artykuły