The Role of the Financial Administration Bodies in the Process of Returning Unjustly Used Public Funds Back Into the Public Budget
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.18.022.10003Keywords:
bubudgetary discipline breach, levy, principle of proportionality, demand for grant repayment, non-payment of the grantAbstract
This article discusses the role of the Financial Administration in the process of returning unjustly used public funds back into the public budget. The introduction will focus on a brief explanation of the institute of the budgetary discipline breach and the activity of the Financial Administration in proceeding of the levy for the breach of budgetary discipline. In the next chapters will be describe the impact of judicial jurisprudence, the strengthening of the grant providers role and the associated practical problems faced by Financial Administration Bodies. The aim of the paper is to look at the position of the Financial Administration Bodies in the process of returning unjustly used public funds back into the public budget, while considering the various aspects that affect this activity.
Downloads
References
Grossova, Marie Emilie: Financni pravo se zamefenim na danove pravo. Ostrava: KEY Publishing s. r. o., in co-edition with B.I.B.S., a.s., Brno, 2008.
Matuskova, T.: Proporcionalita odvodu za poruseni rozpoctove kazne pfijemcem dotace. Pravni rozhledy, ed. Vol. 24, no. 3 (2016).
Matuskova, T.: Dopad novely rozpoctovych pravidel do sfery pfijemcu dotaci a souvisejici judikatura. Pravni rozhledy, Vol. 23, no. 17 (2015).
Sretr, Vladimir: Danova kontrola z pohledu danoveho fadu. Praha: Linde Praha a. s., 2011.
The Annual Report Of Financial Administration 2017, http://www.financnisprava.cz/en/financial-administration/annual-reports.
Legislation and judicial jurisprudence:
Act No. 218/2000 Coll., on Budget Rules.
Act No. 250/2000 Coll., on Budget Rules of Municipality Budgets.
Act No. 280/2009 Coll., Tax Code.
Act No. 40/2009 Coll, Criminal Code.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 1 Afs 77/2010.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 2 As 106/2014.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 4 As 117/2014.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 4 As 215/2014.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 7 Afs 107/2008.
Decision of The Supreme Administrative court No. 7 Afs 91/2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Financial Law Review is an open access journal which means that all the articles published are freely available without charge to the reader or his/her institution.
The articles published in Financial Law Review are available under a licence Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)
The Author furnishes a non-exclusive and free-of-charge license to use the his Work without territorial limitations and for an unlimited period.
Archiving policy
All texts from the journal Financial Law Review are published in electronic version. We strive to archive texts in various databases. Archival issues are also available on the platform of the Academic Scientific Journals: https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/flr/index
Moreover articles published in the journal are archived at the Repository of the University of Gdansk.