Fiscal federalism and tax autonomy. Digital economy challenges

Authors

  • Anna Kopina Department of Financial, Tax and Budget Legislation of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
  • Dmitriy Kopin Russian State University of Justice (RSUJ)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.006.10767

Keywords:

fiscal federalism, local taxation, tax autonomy, digital economy, tax experiment

Abstract

The delimitation of tax administrating powers between the state and its parts (subjects, lands, etc.) has an important role in the foundation of the tax system of any state, regardless of whether it is unitary or federal.

Digital economy is, above all, the emergence of new forms of management, which require a different procedure for the defi nition of the subjects and the objects of  taxation, as well as the procedure for linking the relevant objects to the territories of the sources.

The challenges of digital economy are being actively discussed in relation to crossborder operations and transnational companies on an international level, such interest has become particularly relevant aft er the development of the OECD BEPS plan.

Nonetheless, digital economy also represents a challenge for domestic relations regarding tax management. In this article, taking as an example the Russian Federation, we will illustrate emerging problems in this area and describe the attempts at solving them.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anghileri, D.: Swiss corporate tax reform approved by popular referendum, 05.2019. https://mnetax.com/swiss-corporate-tax-reform-approved-by-popular-referendum-33860#a33860.

Blöchliger, H., King, D.: Fiscal autonomy of sub-central governments, OECD Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, Working paper no. 2 (2005). https://www.oecd.org/ctp/federalism/37388375.pdf.

Boadway, R., Roberts, S., Shah, A.: Fiscal Federalism. Dimensions of Tax Reform guidelines for the assignment in Developing Countries. 1994. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227389404_Fiscal_Federalism.

Bukh, R., Heeks, R.: Defining, Conceptualising and Measuring the Digital Economy. Global Development Institute working papers no. 68 (2017). https://diodeweb.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/diwkppr68-diode.pdf.

Bukht, R., Heeks, R.: Digital Economy Policy in Developing Countries, 2018. https://diode.network/publications/.

Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters Eighteenth session, New York, 23–26 April 2019 Item 3 (j) of the provisional agenda. Tax Issues related to the Digitalization of the Economy E/C.18/2019/CRP.12. https://www.un.org/esa/ff d/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/18STM_CRP12-Work-on-taxation-issues-digitalization.pdf.

Gilardi, F., Kubler, D., Wasserfallen, F.: Cantonal tax autonomy in Switzerland: Trends, challenges, and experiences. Paper prepared for seminar, in: Tax autonomy of subnational entities, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, February 25, 2010. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228724327.

Juchniewicz, E.: Th e principle of fiscal local autonomy in the light of Polish Constitution, Financial Law Review, no. 2 (2)/2017.

Juswanto, W., Simms, R.: Fair Taxation in the Digital Economy, brief no. 2017-5 (December). https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/390261/adbi-pb2017-5.pdf.

Krasyukov, A.: Tax sovereignty: forms and limits of implementation, Financial Law Review no. 10(2)/2018.

Oates, W. E.: On the Theory and Practice of Fiscal Decentralization. IFIR Working Paper no. 2006-05. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5110773_On_the_Theory_and_Practice_of_Fiscal_Decentralization.

OECD (2017), OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017, OECD Publishing, Paris. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264276284-en).

OECD (2019) Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy Public Consultation Document. https://www.oecd.org/tax/beps/public-consultationdocument-addressing-the-tax-challenges-of-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy.pdf.

Ruiz Almendral, V., Vaillancourt, F.: Subnational Personal Income Tax Autonomy in Selected OECD Countries: A comparative perspective, no. 11 (2010). http://www. forumfed.org/publications/subnational-personal-income-tax-autonomy-in-selectedoecd-countries-a-comparative-perspective-number-11/.

Solé-Ollé, A.: Regional tax autonomy in Spain: ‘words’ or ‘deeds’? https://english.oim.dk/media/13655/albert-sol%C3%A9-oll%C3%A9.pdf.

Steinmo, S. H.: The Leap of Faith: Th e Fiscal Foundations of Successful Government in Europe and America. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: September 2018. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198796817.001.0001/oso9780198796817-chapter-1.

Suwandi, Warokka, A.: Fiscal Decentralization and Special Local Autonomy: Evidence from an Emerging Market, 2013. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266080892_Fiscal_Decentralization_and_Special_Local_Autonomy_Evidence_from_an_Emerging_Market.

The digital economy of the Russian Federation. http://ar.gov.ru/ru-RU/typicalPage/typical-page/view/152.

Tyutin, D.V.: Nalogovoe pravo: kurs lekcij (Tax Law: Textbook), 2017 http://www.consultant.ru/edu/student/download_books/book/tiutin_dv_nalogovoe_pravo.

Legal acts:

Act no. 422-FZ /2018, On conducting an experiment to establish a special tax regime “Tax on professional income” in the federal city of Moscow, in Moscow and Kaluga regions, as well as in the Republic of Tatarstan (Tatarstan), as amended.

Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: 2152-О/2016.

Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: 5-P/1997.

Supreme Court of the Russian Federation no. 58-АPG12-5/2012.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2019

How to Cite

Kopina, A. ., & Kopin, D. . (2019). Fiscal federalism and tax autonomy. Digital economy challenges. Financial Law Review, (14(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.4467/22996834FLR.19.006.10767

Issue

Section

Articles