Plebiscite model of participatory budgeting and public values in Poland

Authors

  • Urszula Zawadzka-Pąk University of Białystok

Keywords:

public values, integrity, public participation, legal norms, axiology, participatory budgeting

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to conduct an axiological and legal analysis of the most popular model of participatory budgeting in Poland (the plebiscite model), being a special form of public consultation that allows the residents to decide each year on a part of the commune’s budget expenditure by direct voting. According to the paper’s hypothesis, both the PB legal rules as well as the practice of its application in Poland are not axiologically neutral, which means that they have a positive or negative impact on certain public values, appropriately strengthening or violating them. In the research, the combination of three coherent methods was used: (i) a literature analysis, (ii) the dogmatic and legal method, and (iii) interviews conducted with three groups of PB participants, i.e. municipal officials responsible for the organization of PB procedure, municipal councillors, and residents. The research covers six Polish cities and bases on a catalogue of nodal public values including: human dignity, sustainability, citizen involvement, openness, secrecy, compromise, integrity, and robustness. The research leads to the conclusion that the plebiscite BP in Poland is not axiologically neutral, its rules have both a positive and negative impact on particular nodal public values, however the scale of negative impact is greater than the scale of the positive one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R., Hemming R. and Potter B. H.: Introduction: The Meaning, Content and Objectives of Public Financial Management (in:) Allen, R., Hemming R. and Potter B. H. (eds.): The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Arnstein, S. R.: A Ladder of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, no. 4 [35], 1969.

Damgaard, B., Lewis, J. M.: Accountability and Citizen Participation (in:) Bovens, M., Goodin, R. E., Schillemans T. (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

De Tocqueville, A.: Democracy in America, London: Saunders and Otley, 1835.

Dias, N. Júlio, S.: The next thirty years of Participatory Budgeting in the world start today, in: Dias N. (ed.): Hope for Democracy. 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide, São Brás de Alportel: In Loco Association, 2018.

Dubisz, S. (ed.): Wielki słownik języka polskiego [Great dictionary of the Polish language], Warsaw: PWN, 2019.

Fischer, F.: Participatory Governance: From Theory To Practice (in:) Levi-Faur, D. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Grzybek, G.: Etyka rozwoju a wychowanie, Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego [Publishing House of the University of Rzeszów], 2010.

Guy M.E.: Ethical Decisions Making in Everyday Work Situations, Westport: Quorum Books, 1990.

Huberts L.: The Integrity of Governance. What It Is, What We Know, What Is Done, and Where to Go, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2014.

Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H.: Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, no. 3 [4], 1976.

Jent, H. C.: Demos Kratos. Democracy, Old and New. The Social Studies, no. 6 [58], 1967.

Jørgensen, T. B. and Bozeman, B.: Public Values An Inventory, Administration & Society, no. 3 [39], 2007.

Lotko, E.: Participatory budgeting in Russia – Procedural Aspects, Bialystok Legal Studies, no. 3 [24], 2019.

Miller, G. J. and Whitford, A. B.: The Principal’s Moral Hazard: Constraints on the Use of Incentives in Hierarchy, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, no. 2 [17], 2006.

OECD: Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries 2019, Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

Pape, M. and Lim, C.: Beyond the “Usual Suspects”? Reimagining Democracy With Participatory Budgeting in Chicago, Sociological Forum, no. 4 [34], 2019.

Rossmann, D., Shanahan, E. A.: Defining and Achieving Normative Democratic Values in Participatory Budgeting Processes, Public Administration Review, no. 1 [72], 2012.

Ruśkowski, E.: Istota i pojęcie publicznej polityki finansowej (in:) Kosikowski, C. and Ruśkowski, E. (eds.): Finanse publiczne i prawo finansowe, Warsaw: ABC, 2006.

Sintomer, Y., Herzberg C. and Röcke, A.: Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, no. 1 [32], 2008.

Sześciło, D.: Participatory Budgeting in Poland: Quasi-Referendum Instead of Deliberation, Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, no. 15, 2015.

Thompson, D. F.: Democratic Secrecy, Political Science Quarterly, no. 2 [114], 1999.

Wampler, B.: Participatory Budgeting in Brazil Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2007.

Wampler, B.: When Does Participatory Democracy Deepen The Quality Of Democracy, Comparative Politics, no. 41, 2008.

Yang, K., Pandey, S. K.: Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes?, Public Administration Review, no. 6 [72], 2011.

Zarychta, A., Grillos, T. and Andersson K. P.: Public Sector Governance Reform and the Motivation of Street-Level Bureaucrats in Developing Countries, Public Administration Review, no. 1 [80], 2020.

Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K.: Accountability, public values, and participatory budgeting in Poland, Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, no 2 [14], 2021.

Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K.: Aksjologiczno-prawna analiza plebiscytowego modelu budżetu partycypacyjnego (obywatelskiego) na przykładzie wybranych polskich miast [Axiological and legal analysis of the plebiscite model of participatory (civic) budget on the example of Polish cities], Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny [Legal, Economic and Sociological Journal], no. 1 [82], 2020.

Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K.: Ochrona dobra wspólnego poprzez budżet partycypacyjny (obywatelski). Studium aksjologiczno-prawne [Protection of the common good through a participatory (civic) budget. Axiological and legal study], Białystok: Temida 2, 2019.

Zawadzka-Pąk, U. K., Tomášková, E.: Legal and Axiological Aspects of Participatory Budgeting Procedure in Poland and the Czech Republic, Bialystok Legal Studies, no. 3 [24], 2019.

Legal Acts

Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (Journal of Laws, vol. 78, issue 483 with amendments).

Act amending Certain Acts to Increase the Participation of Citizens in the Process of Selecting, Functioning, and Controlling Certain Public Bodies of January 11, 2018, (Journal of Laws of 2018, item 130).

Act on Municipal Self-Government of March 8, 1990 (consolidated text, Journal of Laws of 2021, issue 1372 with amendment).

Act on Public Finance of August 27, 2009 (consolidated text, Journal of Laws of 2021, issues 305 with amendments).

Court rulings

Ruling of Constitutional Tribunal of Poland of November, 24th 2009, SK 36/07, OTK ZU 2009, no. 19A, issue 151.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2022

How to Cite

Zawadzka-Pąk, U. . (2022). Plebiscite model of participatory budgeting and public values in Poland. Financial Law Review, (26(2), 17–31. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/flr/article/view/7121

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)