New Tax Reality for Permanent Establishment of Foreign Enterprises in Poland in a Post-Beps Era

Authors

  • Marcin Jamrozy Warsaw School of Economics
  • Magdalena Janiszewska Warsaw School of Economics
  • Filip Majdowski Polish Ministry of State Assets

Keywords:

permanent establishment, Polish tax authorities, BEPS Action 7, MLI, double tax treaty, Poland, tax avoidance, tax ruling, commissionaire arrangements, activities of auxiliary or preparatory character, splitting-up of contracts

Abstract

The main aim of this contribution is to make a review and assess the application of BEPS Action 7 recommendations by the tax administration in Poland when determining whether a non-resident enterprise operating in Poland should be considered to have a permanent establishment (PE). The creation of a PE is crucial for taxable presence in Poland and for identifying the scope of the allocated revenues and expenses (taxable income). Changes to the OECD Model have a genuine practical impact on multinational enterprises and tax administrations and thus they need to be closely examined. The considerations serve to prove the hypothesis that Polish tax authorities apply the recommendations of BEPS Action 7 despite the fact that Poland lodged reservations concerning the non-application of Art. 12-14 of the MLI in its entirety. Beyond the legal-dogmatic research the contribution refers directly to the results of an empirical study carried out by the authors in the course of which 88 individual tax rulings issued by the Polish tax authorities were identified and examined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnold, B.: Threshold Requirements for Taxing Business Profits Under Tax Treaties, Bulletin for International Taxation, nr 10 [57], 2003.

Brauner, Y.: Yariv, BEPS: An Interim Evaluation, World Tax Journal nr 1[6], 2014

Critchley, R.: Dispute Prevention Avenues for Permanent Establishments, International Transfer Pricing Journal nr 4 [24], 2017.

Drobnik, P.: The Attribution of Profits to a Dependent Agent PE – If the Dependent Agent Is a Commissionaire (Wholly Owned Subsidiary) of the Principal, International Transfer Pricing Journal, nr 3 [25], 2018.

Dutriez, J-F.: Attribution of Profits to a Permanent Establishment of a Company Engaged in Online Sales of Goods through a Local Warehouse, International Transfer Pricing Journal, nr 3 [25], 2018.

Garbarino, C.: Permanent Establishments and BEPS Action 7: Perspectives in Evolution, Intertax nr 4 [47], 2019.

Gomes, M. L.: The DNA of the Principal Purpose Test in the Multilateral Instrument, Intertax, nr 1 [47], 2019.

Gramm, C.: Profit Attribution to a Fixed Place Permanent Establishment: Case Study – Showroom, International Transfer Pricing Journal, nr 2 [27], 2020.

Hongler, P., Pistone, P.: Blueprints for a New PE Nexus to Tax Business Income in the Era of the Digital Economy, 20 WU International Taxation Research Paper Series, 2015.

Jamroży, M., Janiszewska, M.: Permanent establishment as a foreign direct investment in Poland: identification of tax barriers in the context of new tax development, International Journal of Management and Economics, nr 2 [57], 2021.

Jamroży, M.: Zakład zagraniczny w kontekście planu działań BEPS [Permanent Establishment in the context of BEPS Action Plan], Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach [Economic Studies. Scientific Journals of the University of Economics in Katowice], nr 294, 2016.

Jiménez, M. A.: Preventing Avoidance of PE Status (in) A. Trepelkov. A. et al. (eds.): UN Handbook on Selected Issues in Protecting the Tax Base of Developing Countries, 2nd ed., New York: United Nations, 2017.

Kleist, D.: A Multilateral Instrument for Implementing Changes to Double Tax Treaties: Problems and Prospects, Intertax nr 11 [44], 2016.

Krysiak, C., Jamroży, M.: Zmiany umów o unikaniu podwójnego opodatkowania związane z wielostronną konwencją implementującą środki traktatowego prawa podatkowego (MLI) [Amendments to treaties for the avoidance of double taxation related to a multilateral convention implementing measures of the treaty tax law (MLI)] (in) Brzeziński, B. et al. (eds): Nowe narzędzia prawne w podatkach dochodowych i majątkowych. Poprawa efektywności systemu podatkowego [New legal tools in income and property taxes. Improving the efficiency of the tax system], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

Lennard, M.: Base Erosion and Profit Shifting and Developing Country Tax Administrations, Intertax nr 10 [44], 2016.

Lipniewicz, R.: Podatkowy zakład zagraniczny. Koncepcja i funkcjonowanie [Foreign tax establishment. Concept and Functioning], Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.

Pleijsier, A.: The Agency Permanent Establishment in BEPS Action 7: Treaty Abuse of Business Abuse?, Intertax nr 2 [43], 2015.

Pleijsier, A.: The Agency Permanent Establishment under Revision?:‘Acting in the name of’ or ‘What’s in a name?’!, Intertax nr 6/7 [25], 1997.

Pleijsier, A.: The Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status: A Reaction to the BEPS Action 7 Final Report, International Transfer Pricing Journal nr 6 [23], 2016.

Prakash, K.: Permanent Establishments under the OECD Model (2017) Based on the Principal Role Leading to the Conclusion of Contracts – A Doctrinal and Policy Analysis, Bulletin for International Taxation nr 11 [74], 2020.

Spinosa, L.: A Long-Term Solution for Taxing Digitalized Business Models: Should the Permanent Establishment Definition Be Modified to Resolve the Issue or Should the Focus Be on a Shared Taxing Rights Mechanism?, Intertax nr 6/7 [46], 2018.

Tracana, D.: The Effect of the OECD/G20 BEPS Initiative on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments: The Special case of Agency Permanent Establishments, Bulletin for International Taxation, nr 3/4 [71], 2017.

Uslu, Y.: An Analysis of “Google Taxes” in the Context of Action 7 of the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Initiative, Bulletin for International Taxation nr 4a [72], 2018.

Van Duijn, H-J., IJsselmuiden, R.O.: Will the Netherlands Threshold for Levying Taxes on PEs Be Lowered by Proposed Changes in Line with BEPS Action 7: Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of PE Status?, European Taxation nr 2/3 [56], 2016.

Vann, R.: Travellers, Tax Policy and Agency Permanent Establishments, British Tax Review nr 6, 2010

Watson, S., Palazzo-Corner, N., Haemmerle, S., UK View on Revised PE Standards in the Multilateral Instrument, International Transfer Pricing Journal, nr 3 [24], 2017.

Court rulings

Supreme Court (NSA) ruling of 8th November 2018, II FSK 3718/17 (https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl).

Provincional Court in Warsaw (WSA) ruling of 28th January 2020, III SA/Wa 696/19 (https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl)

Provincional Court in Gliwice (WSA) of 26th November 2021, I SA/Gl 1035/21 (https://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl).

Other official documents

OECD: Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status, Action 7 - 2015 Final Report, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, 2015.

OECD: Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version, OECD Publishing, 2017.

OECD: Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation – Interim Report 2018, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, 2018.

OECD: Additional Guidance on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments. BEPS Action 7, OECD Publishing, 2018.

Internet resources

Schwarz Jonathan, Permanent Establishment: La lutte continue, Kluwer Tax Blog. Available at: http://kluwertaxblog.com/2017/07/24/permanent-establishment-la-lutte-continue/, accessed: 14th July 2022.

Downloads

Published

30.09.2022

How to Cite

Jamrozy, M. ., Janiszewska, M. ., & Majdowski, F. . (2022). New Tax Reality for Permanent Establishment of Foreign Enterprises in Poland in a Post-Beps Era. Financial Law Review, (27(3), 50–69. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/flr/article/view/7286

Issue

Section

Articles