The importance of the tax-benefit policy for the level of income inequality in OECD countries

Authors

  • Anita Szymańska University of Gdansk

Keywords:

income inequality, redistribution, polarization, poverty

Abstract

The study presents the main facts related to the formation of income inequalities in 21 OECD countries in the years 2005–2015. The main interest was to examine whether countries with higher market inequalities use a larger scope of redistributive policy and whether these measures cause the limitation of the range between countries generated by the market income differentiation. Finally, it was found that the decisive influence on the shape of the tax-benefit policy is primarily due to the idiosyncratic socio-economic model in individual countries, while the market income diversification is definitely less significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bourguignon F. (2017), World changes in inequality: an overview of facts, causes, consequences and policies, Bank for International Settlements, Basel, Working Paper, no. 654.

Charles-Coll J.A. (2013), The Debate Over the Relationship Between Income Inequality and Economic Growth Does Inequality Matter for Growth?, Macrothink Institute, „Research in Applied Economics”, Vol. 5, No. 2.

Förster M., Mira d’Ercole M. (2005), Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s, „OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper”, No. 22, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Galor O., Moav O. (2004), From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development, „Review of Economic Studies”, Vol. 71, No. 4.

Immervoll H., Richardson L. (2011), Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades?, „IZA Discussion Paper Series”, No. 6030, Bonn.

Krugman P. (1995), Europe Jobless, America Penniless?, „Foreign Policy”, No. 95.

Lindbeck A. (1986), Limits to the Welfare State, „Challenge”, Vol. 28, No. 60.

Lindert P.H. (2004), Growing public social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

OECD (2008), Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries, OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2011), Divided westand: Why inequality keeps rising, OECD Publishing, Paris.

OECD (2015), Back to Work: Sweden: Improving the Re-employment Prospects of Displaced Workers, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Pareliussen J., Andréi Ch., Bourroussei H., K. Vincent (2017), Income, wealth and equal opportunities in Sweden, „OECD Economics Department Working Papers”, No. 1394, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Rosen S. (1981), The Economics of Superstars, „The American Economic Review”, Vol. 71, No. 5.

Rutkowski W. (2008), Nierówność i wzrost gospodarczy, „Polityka Społeczna”, nr 5/6.

Trends in Political Values and Core Attitudes: 1987–2007 (2007), Pew Research Center for People and the Press, Washington DC.

Wang C., Caminada K., Goudswaard K. (2014), Income redistribution in 20 countries over time, „International Journal of Social Welfare”, Vol. 23, No. 3.

Yunker J.A. (2016), Economic inequality and optimal redistribution: A theoretical and empirical analysis, „Journal of Policy Modeling”, Vol. 38, No. 3.

Published

2018-10-17

How to Cite

Szymańska, A. (2018). The importance of the tax-benefit policy for the level of income inequality in OECD countries. Zarządzanie I Finanse, 16(3.2), 305–318. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/zif/article/view/7697

Issue

Section

Artykuły