Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweA survey study of fisheries in the Baltic Sea: International comparisons and problem of using common fish stocks
Słowa kluczowe:
Baltic Sea, common-poll fish resources, fishery, fishing indicatorsAbstrakt
The Baltic Sea is one of the most intensively used seas of the Earth. The fish stocks in the Baltic Sea are small, they are endangered by excessive exploitation and are transboundary. The problem of rational use of the fish stock is solved only at the international level. Rational fisheries are based on knowledge of its socio-economic motives and environmental aspects. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively assess the state of fisheries in the Baltic Sea using the methodology of comparative analysis. The results of the study are the identification of the features of the use of common fish resources and the identification of priorities for the interaction of fishery subjects in the Baltic Sea.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Assessment of balance indicators for key fleet segments and review of national reports on Member States efforts to achieve balance between fleet capacity and fishing opportunities (2016), Reports of the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries. STECF-16-18. 2016, https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/1453963/STECF+16-18+-+Balance+capacity.pdf.
COM (2014) 545 final. Guidelines for the analysis of the balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities according to Art 22 of Regulation (EU) No. 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and the Council on the Common Fisheries Policy, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2014:545:FIN.
Commission proposes Baltic Sea fishing opportunities for 2016: more stocks than ever to be fished at sustainable levels, European Commission Press release. Brussels, 2 September 2015. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5563_en.htm.
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper (1992), Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment, Part I – Manual, 306/1, rev. 1. Edited by Sparre, P. and Venema, S.C. http://www.fao.org/docrep/w5449e/w5449e00.htm.
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper (2002), Sample-Based Fishery Surveys – A Technical Handbook, http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y2790E/y2790e02.htm#TopOfPage
Frost H., Lanters R., Smit J., Sparre P. (1995), An appraisal of the effects of the Decommissioning Schemes in the case of Denmark and the Netherlands, DIFER, South Jutland University Press, Esbjerg.
Hannesson R. (1993), Bioeconomic Analysis of Fisheries. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hannesson R. (1997), Fishing as a Supergame, “Journal of Environmental Economics and Management”, Vol. 32, No. 3.
Hilborn R., Branch T.A., Pauly D. (2013), Does catch reflect abundance?, “Nature”, No. 494 (7437).
Jul-Larsen E., Kolding J., Overå R., Raakjær Nielsen J., Zwieten P.A.M. van. (2003), Management, co-management or no management? Major dilemmas in southern African freshwater fisheries. Synthesisreport, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 426/1, Rome.
Marchala P., De Oliveira J., Lorance P., Baulier L., Pawlowski L. (2013), What is the added value of including fleet dynamics processes in fisheries models?, “Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences”, Vol. 70, No. 7.
Maunder M.N., Sibert J.R., Fonteneau A., Hampton J., Kleiber P., Harley S.J. (2006), Interpreting catch per unit effort data to assess thestatus of individual stocks and communities, “ICES Journal of Marine Science”, Vol. 63, No. 8.
McCluskey S.M., Lewison R.L. (2008), Quantifying fishing effort: a synthesis of current methods and their applications, “Fish and Fisheries”, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Vol. 9, No. 2.
Pinello D., Gee J., Dimech M. (2017), Handbook for fisheries socio-economic sample survey. Principles and practice, FAO, Rome.
The 2017 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF-17-12) (2017), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/2017-annual-economic-report-eu-fishing-fleet-stecf-17-12.
The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/.
Материалы общего допустимого улова в районе добычи (вылова) водных биоресурсов во внутренних морских водах Российской Федерации, территориальном море Российской Федерации, на континентальном шельфе Российской Федерации, в исключительной экономической зоне Российской Федерации, в Азовском и Каспийском морях, на 2017 г. (с оценкой воздействия на окружающую среду). Часть 1. Рыбы морей Европейской части России, в части водных биологических ресурсов Балтийского моря, Куршского и Вислинского (Калининградского) заливов, Калининград, ФГБНУ АтлантНИРО. 2017. 13 с. https://atlantniro.ru/images/stories/files/ob.sluwanij/Materiali_ODU_2017.pdf.
Мнацаканян А.Г., Кузин В.И., Харин А.Г. (2018), О некоторых тенденциях современного развития российского рыбного хозяйства, «Балтийский экономический журнал», №1 (21), http://www.klgtu.ru/upload/science/magazine/bezh/Балтийскийэкономический%20журнал%201(21)%20(2018).pdf.
Приказ Министерства сельского хозяйства Российской Федерации от 21.10.2014 г. №399 “Об утверждении общего допустимого улова водных биологических ресурсов во внутренних морских водах Российской Федерации, территориальном море Российской Федерации, на континентальном шельфе Российской Федерации и в исключительной экономической зоне Российской Федерации, в Азовском и Каспийском морях на 2015 год (с изменениями на 26.12.2014 г.)”, http://docs.cntd.ru/document/420228083.
