Preliminary development of the Vietnamese Marital Satisfaction Scale (MSS-VN): a pilot study using a Vietnamese intellectual sample

Linh Thi Trinh; Hanh Thi Phan

doi:10.5114/hpr.2019.86701

Autor

Linh Thi Trinh University of Social Sciences and Humanities – Vietnam National University
Hanh Thi Phan Tianjin Normal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2019.86701

Słowa kluczowe:

Vietnamese Marital Satisfaction Scale (MSS-VN), development, validation, intellectual

Abstrakt

Background
The objective of the present study was to develop a scale to measure marital satisfaction within a Vietnamese context (Vietnamese Marital Satisfaction Scale – MSS-VN). Due to the lack of in-depth studies in Vietnam on marital satisfaction, as well as a paucity of specialized Vietnamese context measurement tools in this field, the marital satisfaction dimensions of the MSS-VN were based on extant research literature and the social-cultural context of Vietnamese intellectual couples.

Participants and procedure
A group of 10 Vietnamese intellectuals (ages 28 to 43 years, five males/five females) were used to vet the MSS-VN questions during the question development phase of the study. The final version of the MSS-VN was administered to a convenience sample consisting of 144 male and 145 female Vietnamese intellectuals (age 22 to 50 years, M = 31.60, SD = 5.40). Analysis involved tests of reliability and validity (internal consistency, content validity, and convergent validity).

Results
The results in the exploratory factor analysis of the MSS-VN indicated the maintenance of 33 items, distributed in five factors: emotional support, division of responsibilities and housework, child-rearing, decision making and financial management, and cohesion. The convergent validity showed rather strong correlation between the final scale solution and the sub-scale “dyadic satisfaction” from the Dyadic Adjustment Scale of Spanier.

Conclusions
The MSS-VN was considered satisfactory for the proposed intent of developing a measure of marital satisfaction within a Vietnamese context, with consistency for application in other studies on Vietnamese intellectual’s marital satisfaction; however, due to the limitation of the convenience sample, further evidence on the validation of the MSS-VN is required.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Amato, P. R., Booth, A., Johnson, D. R., & Rogers, S. J. (2007). Alone together: How marriage in America is changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Barrientos, J. E., & Páez, D. (2006). Psychosocial variables of sexual satisfaction in Chile. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 32, 351–368. https://doi. org/10.1080/00926230600834695.

Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. (1990). Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood: Pregnancy to three years postpartum. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/352833.

Benin, M. H., & Agostinelli, J. (1988). Husbands’ and wives’ satisfaction with the division of labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 349–361. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2307/352002.

Berg, P., & Snyder, D. K. (1983). Differential diagnosis of marital and sexual distress: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 7, 290–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00926238108405430.

Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Bowerman, C. (1957). Adjustment in marriage: Overall and in specific areas. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 257–263.

Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.

Broman, C. L. (2005). Marital quality in black and white marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 431– 441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X04272439.

Burr, W. (1967). Marital satisfaction: A concept reformation, theory and partial test of the theory. University of Minnesota. Ph.D. dissertation.

Burr, W. (1970). Satisfaction with various aspects of marriage over the life cycle: A random middle class sample. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 29–37.

Busby, D. M., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H., & Christensen, C. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x.

Caughlin, J. P. (2002). The demand/withdraw pattern of communication as a predictor of marital satisfaction over time. Human Communication Research, 28, 49–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00798.x.

Christensen, A., & Shenk, J. L. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.59.3.458.

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/3150876.

Dalton, R. J., Pham, M. H., Pham, T. N, & Ong, T. N. N. (2002). Social relations and social capital in Vietnam: Findings from the 2001 World Values Survey. Comparative Sociology, 1, 369–386. https://doi. org/10.1163/156913302100418646.

Davison, S. L., Bell, R. J., LaChina, M., Holden, S. L., & Davis, S. R. (2009). The relationship between self-reported sexual satisfaction and general well-being in women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 2690–2697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743- 6109.2009.01406.x.

Do, N. K., & Weiss, B. (2017). Sự thay đổi mức độ hài lòng trong hai năm đầu hôn nhân [The change in satisfaction level in the first two years of marriage]. Proceeding of international conference The First Southeast Asia Regional Conference of Psychology: “Human well-being and sustainable development”, 252–261.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Fowers, B. J. (1990). An interactional approach to standardized marital assessment: A literature review. Family Relations, 39, 368–377. https://doi. org/10.2307/585215.

Fun, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893- 3200.21.4.572.

Gager, C. T., & Sanchez, L. (2003). Two as one? Couples’ perceptions of time spent together, marital quality, and the risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X02238519.

Graham, J. M., Liu, Y. J., & Jeziorski, J. L. (2006). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x.

Hendrick, S. (1988). Generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352430.

Hicks, M., & Platt, M. (1970). Marital happiness and stability: A review of the research in sixties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 553–574. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350251.

Hoang, B. T. (2012). Sự hài lòng về cuộc sống của người Việt Nam: Một số phát hiện ban đầu và hàm ý chính sách [Life satisfaction of Vietnamese people: Some initial findings and policy implications]. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu con người, 4, 3–13.

Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., Doxey, C., Klein, D. M., & Loyer-Carlson, V. (1997). The relationship evaluation (RELATE). Provo, UT: The RELATE Institute.

Honeycutt, J. (1986). A model of marital functioning based on an attraction paradigm and social-penetration dimensions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 651–659. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352051.

Hunsley, J., Best, M., Lefebvre, M., & Vito, D. (2001). The seven-item short form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further evidence of construct validity. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29, 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180126501.

Huppé, M., & Cyr, M. (1997). Répartition des tâches familiales et satisfaction conjugale de couples à double revenu selon les cycles familiaux [Housework division and conjugal satisfaction of dualearner couples by family cycles]. Revue Canadienne de counseling et de thérapie, 31, 145–162.

Imamoglu, E. O., & Yasak, Y. (1997). Dimensions of marital relationships as perceived by Turkish hus bands and wives. Genetic Social & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 211–232.

Inselberg, R. (1961). Social and psychological factors associated with high school marriages. Journal of Home Economics, 53, 766–772.

Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077.

Johnson, H. A., Zabriskie, R. B., & Hill, B. (2006). The contribution of couple leisure involvement, leisure time, and leisure satisfaction to marital satisfaction. Marriage and Family Review, 40, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v40n01_05.

Jose, O., & Alfons, V. (2007). Do demographics affect marital satisfaction? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00926230600998573.

Kurdek, L. A. (2005). Gender and marital satisfaction early in marriage: A growth curve approach. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00006.x.

Lavner, J. A., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication? Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301.

Le, T. T. B. T. (2015). Phụ nữ trí thức và gia đình ngày nay [Female intellectuals and family today]. In T. V. T. Nguyen (Ed.), Female intellectual with the development career of the country (pp. 296–316). Hanoi: Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.

Li, H., Zhang, J., Sin, L. T., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Relative earnings of husbands and wives in urban China. China Economic Review, 17, 412–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2005.11.001.

Locke, H. (1951). Predicting adjustment in marriage. New York: Henry Holt & Co., Inc. Locke, H., & Wallace, K. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 21, 251–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/348022.

Lucas, T., Parkhill, M. R., Wendorf, C. A., Imamoglu, E. O., Weisfeld, C. C., Weisfeld, G. E., & Shen, J. (2008). Cultural and evolutionary components of marital satisfaction: A multidimensional assessment of measurement invariance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 109–123. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022107311969.

MacEwen, K., & Barling, J. (1993). Type A behavior and marital satisfaction: Differential effects of achievement striving and impatience/irritability. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 1001–1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/352779.

Manson, M. P., & Lerner, A. (1970). The Marriage Adjustment lnventory: Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224.

Myers, S. M., & Booth, A. (1999). Marital strains and marital quality: The role of high and low focus of control. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 423–436. https://doi.org/10.2307/353759.

Nguyen, H. D. (2015). Sự hài lòng với hôn nhân và các yếu tố tác động [Marital satisfaction and some impact factors]. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Gia đình và Giới, 4, 3–14.

Nguyen, H. M. (2012). Các mối quan hệ trong gia đình ở Việt Nam: Một số vấn đề cần quan tâm [Family relationships in Vietnam: Some issues interests]. Tạp chí Xã hội học, 4, 91–100.

Nguyen, T. H. (2016). Sự hài lòng với cuộc sống gia đình của phụ nữ bị bạo lực gia đình [Satisfaction with the family life of women with domestic violence]. Tạp chí Tâm lý học, 8, 34–44.

Nye, F. (1988). Fifty years of family research, 1937- 1987. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 305– 316. https://doi.org/10.2307/351998.

Olson, D. H., Druckman, J. M., & Fournier, D. G. (1982). Prepare/Enrich: Counselor’s Manual. Minneapolis, MN: Prepare-Enrich, Inc.

Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.21.9

Pimentel, E. E. (2006). Gender ideology, household behavior, and backlash in urban China. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0192513X05283507.

Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1993). Marriage and relationship questionnaire: MARQ handbook. Kent, UK: Hodder and Stoughton.

Santos-Iglesias, P., Vallejo-Medina, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2009). Propiedades psicométricas de una versión breve de la escala de ajuste diádico en muestras españolas [Psychometric properties of a short version of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale in Spanish samples]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 9, 501–517.

Schumm, W., Jurich, A., & Bollman, S. (1981). The validity of Edmonds’ Marital Conventional Scale. Journal of Psychology, 109, 65–71. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00223980.1981.9915288.

Snyder, D. K. (1979). Multidimensional assessment of marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 813–823. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351481.

Snyder, D. K. (1983). Clinical and research applications of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory. In E. E. Filsinger (Ed.), Marriage and family assessment: A sourcebook for family therapy (pp. 169–190). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350547.

Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 825–839. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/ 351827.

Stinnett, N., Collins, J., & Montgomery, J. (1970). Marital need satisfaction of older husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 428– 434. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/350107.

Tran, T. M. D., & Nguyen, T. V. T. (2015). Nữ trí thức với công tác lãnh đạo quản lý [Intellectual female with leadership management]. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội: Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn, 31, 1–12.

Turliuc, M. N., & Muraru, A. A. (2013). Psychometric properties of the revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale on a sample of married adults. Journal of Psychological and Educational Research, 21, 49–76.

Vaughn, M. J., & Baier, M. E. M. (1999). Reliability and validity of the Relationship Assessment Scale. American Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 137–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/019261899262023.

Vo, K. H. (2007). Vai trò giới và lượng hóa giá trị gia đình [Gender role and quantitative value of labor in the family]. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Gia đình và Giới, 4, 81–86.

Volsky, J. A. (1998). Intimacy, marital satisfaction, and sexuality in mature couples. Concordia University. Ph.D. dissertation.

Wadsby, M. (1998). Evaluation of the Swedish version of the ENRICH Marital Inventory. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039489850139409.

Waite, L. J., & Lillard, L. A. (1991). Children and marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 930–953.

Ward, P. J., Lundberg, N. R., Zabriskie, R. B., & Berrett, K. (2009). Measuring Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 412–429. https://doi. org/10.1080/01494920902828219.

Whiteman, S. D., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (2007). Longitudinal changes in marital relationships: The role of offspring’s pubertal development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(4), 1005-1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00427.x.