Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweAssessing mentalizing beyond personality pathology: exploring the psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the CAMSQ and its associations with personality traits and well-being
Słowa kluczowe:
Big Five, Dark Tetrad, mentalizing, self-certainty, other-self discrepancyAbstrakt
Background:
The Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ) is a recently developed measure of mentalizing designed to assess certainty about one’s own and others’ mental states. While it was originally validated using personality pathology measures, this study explores the relevance of the CAMSQ for understanding personality traits and well-being in the general population.
Participants and procedure:
The sample consisted of 462 Slovak participants aged 18-79 years (M = 34.0). To assess temporal stability, 128 participants completed a retest after a minimum interval of two weeks. Participants completed the CAMSQ and measures of well-being (life satisfaction, subjective happiness, positive and negative affect, and self-esteem), Big Five personality traits, and Dark Tetrad traits. Psychometric properties of the CAMSQ were examined, including internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), measurement invariance across age and gender, and test-retest reliability.
Results:
Self-Certainty and Other-Certainty were primarily positively associated with well-being measures, extraversion, and conscientiousness, and negatively associated with negative emotionality. Other-Self Discrepancy was negatively associated with well-being. Condition-based regression analysis (CRA) revealed significant effects of discrepancy on psychopathy, sadism, and some well-being measures. The Slovak version of the CAMSQ exhibits acceptable psychometric properties including adequate temporal stability.
Conclusions:
The results suggest that the CAMSQ is not only relevant for assessing personality pathology but can also provide insights into personality psychology and well-being in the general population. Limitations include the predominantly female and young sample, cross-sectional design, reliance on self-report, and examination of a clinically relevant construct in a non-clinical population. These findings support the tool’s utility beyond clinical settings, highlighting its potential for broader psychological research.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Arnett, J. J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The Winding road from the late teens through the twenties (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., & Syme, S. L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. American Psychologist, 49, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15
Babinčák, P. (2018). Subjective happiness in Slovakia. European Journal of Mental Health, 13, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.13.2018.2.1
Bach, B., Kerber, A., Aluja, A., Bastiaens, T., Keeley, J. W., Claes, L., Fossati, A., Gutierrez, F., Oliveira, S. E. S., Pires, R., Riegel, K. D., Rolland, J. P., Roskam, I., Sellbom, M., Somma, A., Spanemberg, L., Strus, W., Thimm, J. C., Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmermann, J. (2020). International assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits: Toward a common nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology, 53, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507589
Ballespí, S., Vives, J., Sharp, C., Chanes, L., & Barrantes-Vidal, N. (2021). Self and other mentalizing polarities and dimensions of mental health: Association with types of symptoms, functioning and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 566254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.566254
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry, 9, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x
Bateman, A. W., & Fonagy, P. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. American Psychiatric Publishing.
Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Cieślak, M., Kozaka, J., Golińska, P. B., & Bidzan, M. (2022). Mentalization and its relation to life satisfaction and the level of mental adjustment to illness in women with breast cancer: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 10323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191610323
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Choi-Kain, L. W., & Gunderson, J. G. (2008). Mentalization: Ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 1127–1135. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081360
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
Dimitrijević, A., Hanak, N., Altaras Dimitrijević, A., & Jolić Marjanović, Z. (2018). The Mentalization Scale (MentS): a self-report measure for the assessment of mentalizing capacity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1310730
Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., & Target, M. (2007). The parent-infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 48, 288–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01727.x
Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Moulton-Perkins, A., Lee, Y. W., Warren, F., Howard, S., Ghinai, R., Fearon, P., & Lowyck, B. (2016). Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One, 11, e0158678. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158678
Fossati, A., Somma, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Borroni, S. (2017). On the relationships between DSM-5 dysfunctional personality traits and social cognition deficits: a study in a sample of consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24, 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2091
Gómez-Leal, R., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Gutiérrez-Cobo, M. J., Cabello, R., & Megías-Robles, A. (2024). The Dark Tetrad: Analysis of profiles and relationship with the Big Five personality factors. Scientific Reports, 14, 4443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55074-w
Halama, P., & Bieščad, M. (2006). Psychometrická analýza Rosenbergovej škály sebahodnotenia s použitím metód klasickej teórie testov (CTT) a teórie odpovede na položku (IRT) [Psychometric analysis of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale by using methods of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)]. Československá psychologie, 50, 588–603.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Humberg, S., Dufner, M., Schönbrodt, F. D., Geukes, K., Hutteman, R., Van Zalk, M. H., Denissen, J. J. A., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2018). Enhanced versus simply positive: a new condition-based regression analysis to disentangle effects of self-enhancement from effects of positivity of self-view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000134
Johnsen, J. K., Haukefer, S. B., Korsan, S. J., Larsen, M., & Holde, G. E. (2023). Quality of life, mentalization, and perception of challenging patient encounters in dentistry: a cross-sectional study. BDJ Open, 9, 27. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00156-6
Kaminska, O., McCutcheon, A. L., & Billiet, J. (2010). Satisficing among reluctant respondents in a crossnational context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 956–984. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq062
Kohút, M., Halama, P., Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2020). Psychometric properties of Slovak short and extra-short forms of Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2). Československá Psychologie, 64, 550–563.
Li, C. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
Luyten, P., Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16, 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
Melchers, M. C., Li, M., Haas, B. W., Reuter, M., Bischoff, L., & Montag, C. (2016). Similar personality patterns are associated with empathy in four different countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00290
Miller, J. D., Hoffman, B. J., Gaughan, E. T., Gentile, B., Maples, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79, 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2020). Measuring the dark core of personality. Psychological Assessment, 32, 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000778
Müller, S., Wendt, L. P., & Zimmermann, J. (2023). Development and validation of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ): a selfreport measure of mentalizing oneself and others. Assessment, 30, 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211061280
Paulhus, D. L., Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Jones, D. N. (2021). Screening for dark personalities: The Short Dark Tetrad (SD4). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37, 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
Posit Team (2025). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R [Computer software]. Posit Software, PBC. Retrieved from https://www.posit.co/Rek, K., Kerber, A., Kemper, C. J., & Zimmermann, J. (2021). Getting the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 ready for clinical practice: Norm values and correlates in a representative sample from the German population [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5hm43
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent selfimage. Princeton University Press.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Schwarzer, N. H., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., Griem, J., Kieschke, U., & Gingelmaier, S. (2021). The relationship between global distress, mentalizing and well-being in a German teacher sample. Current Psychology, 42, 1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01467-3
Selfhout, M., Burk, W., Branje, S., Denissen, J., van Aken, M., & Meeus, W. (2010). Emerging late adolescent friendship networks and Big Five personality traits: a social network approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 509–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00625.x
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004
Teličák, P., Halama, P., & Kohút, M. (2024). The relationship between dark tetrad and conspiracy beliefs. No consistent results across three different samples from Slovakia. Current Psychology, 43, 10448–10457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05171-2
The jamovi project (2024). jamovi (Version 2.5) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
Usluoglu, F., Bülbül, E., & Çakır, R. (2024). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ). Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 53, 398–422. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1418303
