Academic Scientific JournalsRepresentation of different social actors in readers’ comments on immigration: The case of German newspaper articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.1.08Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, refugees, migrants, news media, Germany, AfDAbstract
The article discusses how different social actors are represented in discourse related to immigration and refugees. The main focus is on the comments to the German newspaper articles in the context of the meeting of right-wing politicians and extremists, such as the members of the German Alternative für Deutschland party; during that meeting, the participants discussed controversial immigration policies. Comments posted under the articles covering this meeting and its outcomes are analysed using tools provided by Critical Discourse Analysis. This method shows that both the AfD party and migrants are passivated (migrants more than AfD), with AfD being presented as a victim of circumstances, while migrants are mostly treated as objects in most of the comments. Most blame for the situation seems to be directed towards “the democratic opposition”.
Downloads
References
Amoussou, Franck, Ayodele A. Allagbe (2018). “Principles, theories and approaches to critical discourse analysis”. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature 6/1: 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0601002.
Bączkowska, Anna (2016). “Korpusowa analiza dyskursu związanego z tematyką imigracji w brytyjskiej prasie opiniotwórczej”. Conversatoria Linguistica X: 7–25.
Confessore, Nicolas, Karen Yourish (2016). $2 Billion Worth of Free Media for Donald Trump. Available at t <https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
CORRECTIV (2024, January 21). Secret plan against Germany. correctiv.org. Available at <https://correctiv.org/en/top-stories/2024/01/15/secret-plan-against-germany/>. Accessed 21.02.2024.
Engel, Ulrich (2004). Deutsche Grammatik. Heidelberg: Iudicium.
Gabrielatos, Costas, Paul Baker (2008) “Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005”. Journal of English linguistics 36/1: 5–38.
Helbig, Gerard, Joachim Buscha (1988). Deutsche Grammatik, ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
KhosraviNik, Majid (2010). “The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis”. Journal of Language and Politics 9/1: 1–28.
Lakoff, George, Sam Ferguson (2006, May 25). “The framing of immigration”. Rockridge Institute. Available at <https://web.archive.org/web/20090402112127/http:/www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/immigration.html>. Accessed 21.02.2024.
Larcher, Sylvia Bendel (2015). Linguistische Diskursanalyse, ein Lehrund Arbeitsbuch. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH +Co. KG.
Meibauer, Jörg, Ulrike Demske, Jochen Geilfuss-Wolfgang, Jürgen Pafel, Karl Heinz Ramers, Monika Rothweiler, Markus Steinbach (2012). Einführung in die germanistische Linguistik. Stuttgart, Weimar: Verlag J. B. Metzler.
Moder, Carol Lynn (2004). “Discourse across cultures, across disciplines”. In: Carol Lynn Moder, Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds.). Discourse Across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1–11.
Trutkowski, Ewa (2010). "Referential null subjects in German". In: Chris Cummins, Chi-He Elder, Thomas Godard, Morgan Macleod, Elaine Schmidt, George Walkden (eds.). Proceedings of the Sixth Cambridge Postgraduate Conference in Language Research. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research (CILR), 206– 217.
United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Status of Refugees and Stateless Persons convened under General Assembly resolution 429 (V) of 14 December 1950 (1958, July 28). Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees | Ohchr. United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner. Available at <https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/conventionrelating-status-refugees>.. Accessed 21.02.2024.
van Dijk, Teun A. (2015). “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In: Deborah Tannen, Heidi Hamilton, Deborah Schiffrin (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol. I. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 466–485.
Van Leeuwen, Theo (2003). “The representation of social actors”. In: Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, Malcolm Coulthard (eds.). Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, 32–70.
Van Leeuwen, Theo (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Von Polenz, Peter (1988). Deutsche Satzsemantik, Grundbegriffe des mZwischen-den-Zeilen-Lesens. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Research material
Böck, Eva, Andreas Herz, Christine Kerler (2024). Bericht: Vor Geheimtreffen in Potsdam schon Treffen in Schwaben [Report: Before secret meetings in Potsdam, there were already meetings in Swabia]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten /deutschlandwelt/bericht-vor-geheimtreffen-in-potsdam-schon-treffen-in-schwaben,U2uM8bT>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
Dake, Björn (2024). AfD distanziert sich von Geheimtreffen mit Rechtsextremen [AfD distances itself from secret meetings with right-wing extremists]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nach richten/deutschland-welt/afd-distanziert-sich-von-geheimtreffen-mit-rechtsextremen,U0yF0Wg>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
Eberlein, Nocilas, Stanislaus Kossakowski, Julie Kuhles, Christina Küfner (2024). Gegen rechts: Tausende Menschen in Franken auf der Straße [Against the right: thousands of people in Franconia (protesting) in the streets]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/bayern/gegen-rechts-tausende-menschen-in-franken-auf-der-strasse,U1tllNY>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
Kubitza, Michael (2024). Rechtes Geheimtreffen: Wofür steht der Begriff "Remigration?" [Right-wing secret meeting: What does the term “remigration” stand for?]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/rechtes-geheimtreffen-wofuer-steht-der-begriff-remigration,U12pk0V>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
(2024). Nach rechtem Treffen: "Hans im Glück" und Miteigner trennensich [After the right-wing meeting: “Hans im Glück” and co-ownersseparate]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/nach-rechtem-treffen-hans-im-glueck-und-miteignertrennen-sich,U0yeReg>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
(2024). Nach Rechten-Treffen: AfD-Chefin Weidel trennt sich von Referent [After right-wing meeting: AfD leader Weidel separates fromspeaker]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/nach-rechten-treffen-afd-chefin-weidel-trennt-sich-vonreferent,U1V1TAa>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
(2024). Nach Rechten-Treffen: Scholz fordert Zusammenhalt der Demokraten [After the right-wing meeting: Scholz calls for cohesion among the democratic parties]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/nach-rechten-treffen-scholz-fordert-zusammenhalt-der-demokraten,U13TMFP>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
Possoch, Dominic (2024). AfD-Verbot: Sinnvoll? Machbar? Gerechtfertigt? [AfD ban: makes sense? Possible? Justified?]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/afd-verbotwie-sinnvoll-machbar-gerechtfertigt-waere-das,U1nM79T>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
(2024). Rechten-Treffen in Potsdam: AfD stärker involviert als bekannt [Right-wing meeting in Potsdam: AfD more involved than (previously) known]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/rechten-treffen-in-potsdam-afd-staerker-involviert-als-bekannt,U2sEp4A>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
Zervos, Tobias (2024). Tagesgespräch: Wie denken Sie über ein Verbotder AfD? [ Daily discussion: What do you think about a ban on the AfD?]. Available at <https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/tagesgespraech-wie-denken-sie-ueber-ein-verbot-derafd,U18fPwg>. Accessed 22.02.2024.
