Academic Scientific JournalsReading, capitalism, and Instagram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2025.2.02Keywords:
narrative, text, social media, reading, capitalism, textualisation of lifeAbstract
This article summarises theoretical considerations on the reading process, describes the processual mechanics of reading, and applies selected approaches to the study of an Instagram autobiography to prove that there are strong connections between capitalism, narrative composition of social media narratives, and styles of reading. The analysis of Marzena Marideko’s narrative shows how the use of eventfulness, multimodality, and lacunae contributes to the construction of the process of reading as one in which attention is as important as signification, comprehension is not a necessary outcome, and intended tellability overrules narrativity. By studying the nexus of event, illusory immediacy, and elision, I claim the poetics of Instagram reading is essentially predicated on the mechanics and demands of cognitive capitalism.
Downloads
References
Abbott, Porter H. (2013). Real Mysteries: Narrative and the Unknowable. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Baroni, Raphaël, Françoise Revaz (eds.) (2016). Narrative Sequence in Contemporary Narratology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Barthes, Roland (1974). S/Z. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, Roland (1975). The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.
Baumbach, Sybille (2019). “Mind the narratives: Towards a cultural narratology of attention”. In: Astrid Erll, Roy Sommer (eds.). Narrative in Culture. Berlin: de Gruyter, 37–55.
Bell, Alice, Marie-Laure Ryan (2019). Possible Worlds Theory and Contemporary Narratology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Bell, Alice (2010). The Possible Worlds of Hypertext Fiction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Beller, Jonathan (2006). The Cinematic Mode of Production: Attention Economy and the Society of the Spectacle. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2006.
Boorstin, Daniel J. (1992). The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-events in America. New York: Vintage Books.
Booth, Wayne (1983). The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brooke-Rose, Christine (1991). Stories, Theories, and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, Peter (1992). Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Casati, Roberto (2013). Contro il colonialismo digitale: Istruzioni per continuare a leggere. Bari: Editori Laterza.
Celis Bueno, Claudio (2017). The Attention Economy: Labour, Time, and Power in Cognitive Capitalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Chua, Brandon, Elizabeth Ho (eds.) (2023). The Routledge Companion to Global Literary Adaptation in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
Compagnon, Antoine (1998). Le Démon de la théorie Littérature et sens commun. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Crary, Jonathan (2013). 24/7: Late Capitalism and the Ends of Sleep. London: Verso.
Crary, Jonathan (2001). Suspensions of Perception: Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Doležel, Lubomír (1998). Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eaton, M. M. (1976). “On being a character”. The British Journal of Aesthetics 16/1: 24–31.
Eco, Umberto (1979) The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fish, Stanley (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Foucault, Michel (1979). “What is an author?”. Trans. Joseph V. Harari, Screen, Volume 20, Issue 1, Spring, p. 13–34.
Genette, Gerard (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans.
Channa Newman, Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Genette, Gerard (2010). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Han, Byung-Chul (2015). The Burnout Society. Trans. Erik Butler. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Herman, David (2013). Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hutcheon, Linda (2006). A Theory of Adaptation. London: Routledge.
Hühn, Peter (2009). “Event and eventfulness”. In: Peter Hühn et al. (eds.). Handbook of Narratology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 80–97.
Ibrahim, Yasmin (2018). Production of the ‘Self’ in the Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Iser, Wolfgang (1980). The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jannidis, Fotis (2004). Figur und Person: Beitrag zu einer historischen Narratologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Justino, Julia, Regine Kolinsky (2023). “Eye movements during reading in beginning and skilled readers: Impact of reading level or physiological maturation?”. Acta Psychologica 236: 1–12.
Juul, Jesper (2011). Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kafalenos, Emma (2006). Narrative Causalities. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Kaźmierczak, Marek (2015). “Tekstualizacja intymności w Web 2.0 (na przykładzie przedstawień ciąży na stronach serwisu społecznościowego Facebook”. In: Ewa Szczęsna (ed.). Przekaz digitalny: Z zagadnień semiotyki, semantyki i komunikacji cyfrowej. Kraków: Universitas.
Lotman, Yuri (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Trans. Ann Shukman. Introduction by Umberto Eco. London: I. B. Tauris.
Leitch, Thomas M. (1987). “For (against) a theory of rereading”. MFS Modern Fiction Studies 33/3: 491–508.
Markowski, Michał Paweł (2019). Wojny nowoczesnych plemion: Spór o rzeczywistość w epoce populizmu, Kraków: Karakter.
McGann, Jerome J. (1991). The Textual Condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mejias, U. A. (2013). Off the Network: Disrupting the Digital World. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Niermann, Ingo (2024). The Monadic Age: Notes on the Coming Social Order. London: Sternberg Press.
Nünning, Vera (2014). Reading Fictions, Changing Minds: The Cognitive Value of Fiction. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Page, Ruth E. (2012). Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. New York: Routledge.
Pavel, Thomas G. (1986). Fictional Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Phelan, James (1989). Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Phelan, James (1996). Narrative as Rhetoric: Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Phelan, James (2007). Experiencing Fiction: Judgments, Progressions, and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Phelan, James (2017). Somebody Telling Somebody Else: A Rhetorical Poetics of Narrative. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Poe, Edgar Allan (1846). “The philosophy of composition”. Graham’s Magazine 28/4: 163–167.
Poulet, Georges (1969). “Phenomenology of reading”. New Literary History 1/1: New and Old History: 53–68.
Prince, Gerald (1982). Narratology: The Form and Functioning of Narrative. Berlin: Mouton.
Rabinowitz, Peter (1987). Before Reading. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Rogers, Kenneth (2014). The Attention Complex: Media, Archeology, Method. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ronen, Ruth (1994). Possible Worlds in Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, Edward W. (1982). “Opponents, audiences, constituencies, and communities”. Critical Inquiry 9: 1–26.
Scheffel, Michael, Antonius Weixler, Lukas Werner (2014). “Time”. In: Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University Available at http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/time. Accessed 10.10.2024.
Schmid, Wolf (2010). Narratology: An Introduction. Trans. Alexander Starritt. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Schmid, Wolf (2017). “Eventfulness and repetitiveness: Two aesthetics of storytelling”. In: Per Krogh Hansen, John Pier, Philippe Roussin, Wolf Schmid (eds.). Emerging Vectors of Narratology. Berlin: de Gruyter, 229–245.
Sereno, Sara, Keith Rayner (2003). “Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7/11: 489–493.
Shklovsky, Viktor (1965 [1917]). “Art as technique”. In: Lee T. Lemon, Marion J. Reis (eds.). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 3–24.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1982). “The politics of interpretations”. Critical Inquiry 9: 259–78.
Sternberg, Meir (1993 [1978]). Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Strawson, Gallen (2004). “A fallacy of our age – Not every life is a narrative”. TLS – The Times Literary Supplement, October 15: 13–15.
Suleiman, Susan Rubin (1983). Authoritarian Fictions: The Ideological Novel as a Literary Genre. New York: Columbia University Press.
Szczęsna, Ewa (2015). “Znak digitalny: U podstaw nowej semiotyki tekstu”. In: Ewa Szczęsna (ed.). Przekaz digitalny: Z zagadnień semiotyki, semantyki i komunikacji cyfrowej. Kraków: Universitas, 15–34.
Taylor, Mark, Esa Saarinen (1994). Imagologies: Media Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Terranova, Tiziana (2021). “Attention, economy, and the brain”. In: Stanley Wolukau-Wanambwa (ed.). The Lives of Images: Analogy, Attunement, and Attention. New York: Aperture, 131–152.
White, Hayden (1982). “The politics of historical interpretation: Discipline and de-sublimation”. Critical Inquiry 9: 113–37.
Wimsatt, W. K., Jr., Monroe C. Beardsley (1958). “The intentional fallacy”. In: W. K. Wimsatt, Jr. The Verbal Icon. New York: Noonday.
Wojtyna, Miłosz (2018). “Narratology and imagology”. Tekstualia 1/4: 125–144.
Wojtyna, Miłosz, Barbara Miceli, Roksana Zgierska (2022). Reading TV Series: Aesthetics, Themes, and Reception. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Yang, S.-N., G.W. McConkie (2001). “Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation times”. Vision Research 41: 3567– 3585.
Zunshine, Lisa (2006). Why We Read Fiction Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
