The nostalgic chronotope of the English country house in "Pride and Prejudice" and "Death Comes to Pemberley"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2025.3.07Keywords:
Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice, Death Comes to Pemberley, adaptation, country house ideal, nostalgiaAbstract
The article proposes to discuss the representations of Pemberley as an expression of the country house ideal in Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen’s novel and its 1995 adaptation, and in Death Comes to Pemberley, P. D. James’s book and the television series, in the context of manorial nostalgia. I want to argue that by changing the genre and reinterpreting the principal conflicts and characters, the sequel redefines significantly the nostalgic impulse associated with Austen’s novel. A comparative analysis of the changing patterns of manorial idealizations across the four narratives will demonstrate how the nostalgic chronotope is constructed and deconstructed and how the semiotic modelling of space changes in response to the intermedial translation between fiction and film. The paper will locate the analysis in a broader context of the country house literary tradition and manorial representations in heritage films.
Downloads
References
Austen, Jane (1999). Pride and Prejudice. Ware: Wordsworth Classics.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). “Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel”. In: Michael Holquist (ed.). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, TX: Texas Press, 84–258.
Batey, Mavis (1996). Jane Austen and the English Landscape. London: Barn Elms.
Boym, Svetlana (2001). The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books. E-book.
Botting, Fred (1996). Gothic. London: Routledge.
Collins, Amanda (2001). “Jane Austen, film, and the pitfalls of postmodern nostalgia”. In: Linda Troost, Sayre Greenfield (eds.). Jane Austen in Hollywood. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 79–89.
Crang, Mike (2003). “Placing Jane Austen, displacing England: Touring between book, history and nation”. In: Suzanne R. Pucci, James Thompson (eds.). Jane Austen and Co.: Remaking the Past in Contemporary Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 111–132.
Dames, Nicholas (2001). “Austen’s nostalgics”. Representations 73: 117–143.
Death Comes to Pemberley (2014). Dir. Daniel Percival, Writ. Juliette Towhidi. BBC Masterpiece.
Duckworth, Alistair M. (1994). The Improvement of the Estate: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Ellington, Elisabeth H. (2001). “’A correct taste in landscape’: Pemberley as fetish and commodity”. In: Linda Troost and Sayre Greenfield (eds.). Jane Austen in Hollywood. Lexington: University of Kentucky, 90–110.
Hibbard, G. R. (1956). “The country house poem of the seventeenth century”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 19/1: 159–174.
Higson, Andrew (2003). English Heritage, English Cinema: Costume Drama since 1980. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Higson, Andrew (2011). Film England: Culturally English Filmmaking since the 1990s. London: I. B. Tauris.
Hill, John (1999). British Cinema in the 1980s: Issues and Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
James, P. D. (2011). Death Comes to Pemberley. New York: Knopf. E-book.
McCann, Charles J. (1964). “Setting and character in Pride and Prejudice”. Nineteenth-Century Fiction 19/1: 65–75.
Moviechat. Death Comes to Pemberley. Available at <https://moviechat.org/tt2951788/Death-Comes-to-Pemberley/58c890cbd1ea5c14707a6f0b/Elizabeth-Casting>. Accessed 21.10.2024.
Nelson, Camilla (2016). “Spooky Jane: Women, history, and horror in Death Comes to Pemberley”. Adaptation 9/3: 377–392.
Nicol, Patricia (2013). “At home with Mr Darcy”. Sunday Times 22 December. Available at <https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/athome-with-mr-darcy-ljqtwq6036z>. Accessed 10.10.2024.
Pucci, Suzanne (2003). “The return home”. In: Suzanne R. Pucci, James Thompson (eds.). Jane Austen and Co.: Remaking the Past in Contemporary Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 133–156.
Pucci, Suzanne R., James Thompson (2003). “The Jane Austen phenomenon: Remaking the past at the millennium”. In: Suzanne R. Pucci, James Thompson (eds.). Jane Austen and Co.: Remaking the Past in Contemporary Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1–10.
Pride and Prejudice (1995). Dir. Simon Langton, Writ. Andrew Davies. BBC.
Ross, Deborah (2013). “What bounders! They've murdered Jane Austen”. Daily Mail 28 December. Available at <https://wwwdailymail.co.uk/home/event/article-2529520/DEBORAH-ROSSWhat-bounders-Theyve-murdered-Jane-Austen.html>. Accessed 21.10.2024.
Terentowicz-Fotyga, Urszula (2015). Dreams, Nightmares and Empty Signifiers: The English Country House in the Contemporary Novel. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Terentowicz-Fotyga, Urszula (2018). “Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice as a dialogue with the country house ideal”. In: Grażyna Bystydzieńska, Emma Harris (eds.). From Queen Anne to Queen Victoria: Readings in 18th and 19th Century British Literature and Culture. Vol. 6. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 295–311.
Troost, Linda V. (2006). “Filming tourism, portraying Pemberley”. Eighteenth-Century Fiction 18/4: 477–498
Troost, Linda V. (2007). “The nineteenth-century novel on film: Jane Austen”. In: Deborah Cartmell, Imelda Whelehan (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–89.
Wayne, Don E. (1984). Penshurst: The Semiotics of Place and the Poetics of History. London: Methuen.
Williams, Raymond (1993). The Country and the City. London: Hogarth Press.
Voigts-Virchow, Eckart (2007). “Heritage and literature on screen: Heimat and heritage”. In: Deborah Cartmell, Imelda Whelehan (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–137.
Academic Scientific Journals
