Czechoslovak Federation in Comparative Perspective: Steps for Heterogeneous Societies

Authors

  • Michal Greguška University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius
  • Jaroslav Mihálik University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius

Keywords:

Czechoslovak federation, heterogeneous society, separatism, Spain, Belgium

Abstract

This paper stems from the complexity of the Czechoslovak federation and its subsequent dissolution in 1993 as an output of separatist tendencies and moods of the political leaders. Such case study serves as a grounded model for further investigation of current trends of separatism and calls for autonomy in heterogeneous societies, as illustrated in comparative perspective of Spain and Belgium. We argue on multiple levels, finding the common grounds of separatism, federalism and autonomous regions compared to centralist policy making of the institutional framework. Based on this we have developed the criterial distinction of neuralgic points for each of the researched countries which then serves for final interpretation and analysis. The methodological approach is thus constructed around the case tracking method combined with the comparative framework analysis of the models of state-regional autonomy with the prospects of possible steps for heterogeneous societies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Börzel T. A. (2005), Europeanization: How the European Union Interacts with its Member States. In Bulmer S. – Lequesne Ch. The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005

Buchheit L. C. (1978), Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Constitutional Act 143/1968 on Czechoslovak Federation, online: http://www.psp.cz/docs/texts/constitution_1968.html [15 March 2016]

Giuliani M. (2003), Europeanisation in Comparative Perspective: Institutional Fit and National Adaptation. In Featherstone K. - Radaelli C.M., The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003

Greguška M. (2011), Politické aspekty belgického roku bezvládia, in Bocora, J., Lukáč, M., Pajtinka, V. (eds.), Ekonomické, politické a právne otázky medzinárodných vzťahov. Bratislava: Ekonóm, 2011

Greguška M., Ružarovský J. (2014), Rozhodovacia činnosť Ústavného súdu SR vo vzťahu k Národnej rade SR, in Reschová J., Imrovič M.(eds.) Dotyky politológie a ústavného práva. Trnava: Spoločnosť pre verejnú správu pri Slovenskej akadémii vied, FSV UCM Trnava, 2014 Gronský, J. (2007), Komentované dokumenty k ústavním dějinám Československa 1960 – 1989. Praha: Karolinum

Horowitz D. L. (2003), The Cracked Foundations of the Right to Secede, in “Journal of Democracy”, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003 Lijphart A. (1999), Patterns of democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Maastricht Decision’. Jean Monnet Working Paper Series 6/95 (Cambridge: Harvard Law School).

Pithart P. (2015), Po Devětaosmdesátém. Praha: Academia

Popelier P. (2012), The need for sub-national constitutions in federal theory and practice. The Belgian case, in Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2012

Radaelli C. M. (2003), The Europeanization of Public Policy. In Featherstone K. - Radaelli C.M. The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003

Radaelli C. M. (2004), Europeanisation: Solution or Problem? In European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 8, No. 16, 2004

Říchová B. et al. (2009), Západoevropské politické systémy. Praha: Oeconomica

Rychlík J. (2012), Rozdělení Československa 1989-1992. Praha: Vyšehrad Schmidt V. A. (2004), The European Union: Democratic Legitimacy in a Regional State? In “Journal of Common Market Studies”, Volume 42, Issue 5, 2004

Slovak National Party Electoral Program 1992, online: http://www.sns.sk/engine/assets/uploads/2010/03/program_1992.pdf [15 March 2016]

Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia 2006. Generalitat de Catalunya, online: https://www.gencat.cat/generalitat/eng/estatut/preambul.htm [15 March 2016]

Svatuška M. (2003), Vzťahy medzi Čechmi a Slovákmi v období ich spoločnej štátnosti, in “Slovak Journal of Political Sciences”, No. 1, Vol. 2, 2003

The Spanish Constitution of 1978 ratified by the Spanish people in the referendum, online: http://www.legislationline.org/download/action/download/id/2325/file/Spain_Const_1978_eng.pdf [15 March 2016]

Vlaams Belang Electoral Program 2014, online: http://www.vlaamsbelang.org/files/20140318ProgrammaVerkiezingen2014.pdf [15 March 2016]

Weiler J. H.H. (1995), ‘The State ‘uber alles’: Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’. Jean Monnet Working Paper Series 6/95 (Cambridge: Harvard Law School).

Downloads

Published

2016-05-16

How to Cite

Greguška, M., & Mihálik, J. (2016). Czechoslovak Federation in Comparative Perspective: Steps for Heterogeneous Societies. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 4(1), 5–25. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/journal-transformation/article/view/12956

Issue

Section

Central and Eastern European Issues