Smart cities' developmental capacities in the fields of spatial planning and construction - lessons from Copenhagen to Belgrade

Authors

  • Snezana Djordjevic University of Belgrade

Keywords:

Smart Spatial Planning, Construction, IT Applications, Participative Decision Making, Evidence Based Policy Making

Abstract

This paper focuses on smart cities’ capacities to improve quality of public services and decision making in all policy fields, with open data and co-production. Spatial planning and construction are chosen for research as vitally connected with economy and sustainable development. Research methods are: the analysis of existing studies, the comparison of Copenhagen as smart city, and Belgrade, which can learn from good practice (case studies). Main recommendations: change in values, in priorities and patterns of behavior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

(e.g.: [Agger a., Poulsen B., (2017) Street-level Bureaucrats Coping with Conflicts in Area-based Initiatives in Copenhagen and Malmo, Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 40 – No. 4, 2017, Nordic Political Science Association. ISSN 0080-6757 Doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12093).

(e.g.: Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P., (2011), Smart Cities in Europe, in Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), pp. 65-82. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.601117).

(e.g.: Čamprag N., (2019), Re-Imagineering Belgrade and Skopje: Urban Megaprojects between Politics and Struggle, European Planning Studies, 2019, Vol.27, No.1, 181-200, https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1545011 , Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.).

(e.g.: Colic R., (2015) Integrated Urban Development Strategy as an Instrument for Supporting Urban Governance. Serbian Architectural Journal. SAJ. Vol.7, No3, 317-342).

(e.g.: [Co-production in the Public Sector Experiences and Challenges (2016), Eds. Fugini M., Bracci E., Sicilia M., Politecnico di Milano, Springer).

(e.g.: Damsgaard O., (2014): The Danish Planning System 1990-2010: Continuity and Decay in: Spatial Planning Systems and Practice in Europe, 2014, Eds. Reimer M.; Panagiotis G., Blotevogel H., Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, pp. 21-41, Routledge, London, New York.).

(e.g.: Djordjević K., Joksimović O., Jovanović - Popović M., 2018, Energy Consumption and CO2 Emission Reduction through Refurbishment of Residentaal Buildins’ Roofs by applying the Green Roof System - Case Study, in Thermal Science, 2018, Vol.22, Suppl.4, pp S1217-S1229, https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI170530127D).

(e.g.: Djordjević S., (2017), Implementation of Subsidiary Principle in Serbia, Čigoja, FPN, Beograd).

(e.g.: Djordjevic S., (2019), Smart Policies and Innovative Services, in: The E-Future of Cities, Ed. Borislav S., Academy of E&S, UB Faculty of Geography, Belgrade, pp. 361-374).

(e.g.: Djordjevic S., (2019), Steering Urban Policy for Reaching Development and Social Welfare – Lessons from Scandinavia, Teme, g. XLIII, nb. 3, jul-september 2019, pp. 719-731, Nis. https://doi.org/10.22190/TEME190515044D, UDK 316.334.56:711.4(48)).

(e.g.: [Ebsen, M., (2022), The missing builders: craftwork and crafty resistance in the “eco-metropolis” of Copenhagen, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-03-2021-0013 ).

(e.g.: [Engberg, L.A. (2018), Climate adaptation and citizens’ participation in Denmark: experiences from Copenhagen, in Hughes, S., Chu, E.K. and Mason, S.G. (Eds), Climate Change in Cities, The Urban Book Series, Springer International Publishing, Cham. pp. 139-161).

(e.g.: [(e.g.: [Fraker, H., (2013), The Hidden Potential of Sustainable Neighborhoods: Lessons From Low-Carbon Communities, Island Press, Washington. ISBN: 9781610914093).

(e.g.: Holden, M., Airas, A. Larsen, M.T. (2019), Social sustainability in eco-urban neighborhoods revisiting the Nordic model, in Shirazi, M.R., Ramin Keivani, R. (Eds), Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Practice and Policy, Routledge Studies in Sustainability, London, pp. 149-170 ).

(e.g.: Gehl J., (2010), Cities for People, Island Press, Copenhagen).

(e.g.: Laage-Thomsen J., Blok A. (2020), Varieties of green: on aesthetic contestations over urban sustainability pathways in a Copenhagen community garden, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. Volume 4, Issue 2. Sage Publications. doi: 10.1177/2514848620902806).

(e.g.: Simic I., Stupar A., Djokic V., 2017, Builidng the Green Infrastucrure of Belgrade: The Importance of Community Greening, Sustainablitity, 2017, 9, 1183, doi: 10.330/su9071183).

(e.g.: Stojkov, B., Damjanovic, D., Križanic, T, Petrovic, M., (2015). Possibility for upgrading public in-view in preparation and stipulation of spatial and urban plans. PALGO Center, SKGO, Beograd).

(e.g.: The Squatters’ Movement in Europe – Everyday Commons and Autonomy as Alternatives to Capitalism (2014), Eds. Cattaneo C, Martinez Ml., Pluto Press, UK).

Downloads

Published

2022-10-12

How to Cite

Djordjevic, S. (2022). Smart cities’ developmental capacities in the fields of spatial planning and construction - lessons from Copenhagen to Belgrade. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 10(1), 138–154. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/journal-transformation/article/view/7329

Issue

Section

Artykuły