Beyond humor styles: the nature of humor types and differences in basic personality traits from Zuckerman’s Alternative Five-Factor Model
Słowa kluczowe:
cluster analysis, humor types, alternative five-factor model of personalityAbstrakt
Background:
Findings show that the complex nature of humor and its personality basis can be more comprehensively understood if humor styles are analyzed simultaneously within humor types, rather than separately.
Participants and procedure:
Utilizing two independent samples (N1 = 253, N2 = 353) of self-report responses to the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) and the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire-Short Form, this paper outlines how the HSQ responses result in three humor use types following cluster analysis. Cluster differences in humor styles and personality traits were analyzed using ANOVA.
Results:
In both samples, a humor type characteristic of individuals who scored lower in the positive and higher in the negative humor styles was revealed. People within this humor type also scored significantly higher in the personality measures of neuroticism and aggressiveness. A second humor type replicated in the two studies described individuals scoring higher for each of the four humor styles. People within this type also scored significantly higher on extraversion and sensation seeking, suggesting a need for cortical arousal. The third humor type members scored lower in each of the humor styles (apart from the affiliative humor style scores for one of the samples). This humor type requires further investigation.
Conclusions:
In general, humor types provide an additional understanding of humor use as people within the types differ for specific personality dimensions.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Aluja A., Rossier J., Oumar B., García L. F., Bellaj T., Ostendorf F., Ruch W., Wang W., Kövi Z., Ścigała D., Čekrlija Đ., Stivers A. W., Di Blas L., Valdivia M., Ben Jemaa S., Atitsogbe K. A., Hansenne M., & Glicksohn J. (2020). Multicultural validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire shortened form (ZKA-PQ/SF) across 18 countries. Assessment, 27, 728–748. 10.1177/1073191119831770.
Ben-Hur A., Elisseeff A., & Guyon I. (2002). A stability-based method for discovering structure in clustered data. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 6–17.
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Čekrlija Đ., Mrda P., Vujaković L., & Aluja A. (2022). Relationship between humor styles and alternative five factors of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 194, 111625. 10.1016/j.paid.2022.111625.
Dolnicar S., Grün B., Leisch F., & Schmidt K. (2014). Required sample sizes for data-driven market segmentation analyses in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 53(3), 296–306. 10.1177/0047287513496475.
Evans T. R., Johannes N., Winska J., Glinska-Newes A., van Stekelenburg A., Nilsonne G., Dean L., Fido D., Galloway G., Jones S., Masson I., Soares A., Steptoe-Warren G., Thompson N., & D’Angelo Ungson N. (2020). Exploring the consistency and value of humour style profiles. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 4, 1–24. 10.1080/23743603.2020.1756239.
Evans T. R., & Steptoe-Warren G. (2015). Humor style clusters: Exploring managerial humor. International Journal of Business Communication, 55, 443–454. 10.1177/2329488415612478.
Fanslau A., Pawel J., & Renner K. H. (2021). The assessment of the histrionic self-presentation style: Initial validation of the Polish version of the As-If-Scale. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9, 165–178. 10.5114/cipp.2021.105326.
Galloway G. (2010). Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 563–567. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.007.
Jaccard P. (1908). Nouvelles researches sur la distribution florale [New research on floral distribution]. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 44, 223–270. 10.5169/seals-268384.
Kfrerer M. L., & Schermer J. A. (2020). Humor styles and the ten personality dimensions from the Supernumerary Personality Inventory. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 352–360. 10.5114/cipp.2020.101187.
Kraus J. M., Müssel C., Palm G., & Kestler H. A. (2011). Multi-objective selection for collecting cluster alternatives. Computational Statistics, 26, 341–353. 10.1007/s00180-011-0244-6.
Leist A. K., & Müller D. (2013). Humor types show different patterns of self-regulation, self-esteem, and well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 551–569. 10.1007/s10902-012-9342-6.
Martin R. A., Puhlik-Doris P., Larsen G., Gray J., & Weir K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2.
Moreira P. A. S., Inman R. A., & Cloninger C. R. (2022). Humor and personality: Temperament and character have different roles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13, 1246–1258. 10.1177/19485506211066369.
Ruch W. F., & Heintz S. (2014). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it? The European Journal of Humour Research, 1, 1–24. 10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.ruch.
Ruch W., & Heintz S. (2017). Experimentally manipulating items informs on the (limited) construct and criterion validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 616. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00616.
Ruch W., & McGhee P. E. (2014). Humor intervention programs. In A. C Parks & S. M Schueller (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 179–193). Wiley Blackwell.
Schermer J. A., Rogoza R., Kwiatkowska M. M., Kowalski C. M., Aquino S., Ardi R., Ardi R., Bolló H., Branković M., Chegeni R., Crusius J., Doroszuk M., Enea V., Truong T. K. H., Iliško D., Jukić T., Kozarević E., Kruger G., Kurtić A., … Krammer G. (2019). Humor styles across 28 countries. Current Psychology. 10.1007/s12144-019-00552-y.
Vrticka P., Black J. M., & Reiss A. L. (2013). The neural basis of humour processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 860–868. 10.1038/nrn3566.
Zuckerman M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge University Press.
Zuckerman M. (2008). Rose is a rose is a rose: Content and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 110–112. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.014.
Zuckerman M., Kuhlman D. M., Joireman J., Teta P., & Kraft M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757–768. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.757.