The Smart Power Tradition in the Conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian War Using the Example of Local Self-Government

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2025.3.06

Keywords:

postmodern, tradition, ‘smart power’, soft power, hard power, Russian-Ukrainian War

Abstract

This article deals with the validation of the smart-power tradition in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The analysis of scientific research and publications shows that foreign and domestic scientists actively study the phenomenon of ‘smart power’. It is determined that Ukraine’s transition to a postmodern society is filled with complex, contradictory, emergent, but innovative phenomena. Tradition has been shown to be a force for radical renewal and the assertion of ultimate perfection, and its legitimacy has a significant impact on the ability and efficacy of state power. Simultaneously, the ‘smart power’ idea, which encompasses both hard and soft power resources in times of conflict, is a societal archetype whose integrity is comprised of both conservative and creative elements.

Using the example of local self-government, in light of the continuing decentralization reform, the application of both authoritarian and democratic patterns seen under martial law is taken into consideration. The findings of a poll carried out by the Razumkov’s Center in 2025 were examined to determine the degree to which social and state institutions are impacted. It was found that under wartime circumstances, some restrictions are necessary, so the use of the ‘smart power’ tradition makes it expedient to combine and use the elements of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ power.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonin E.A. Bandurka O.M., Martynov A.Yu.. 2002, Velyka Roztoka (hlobalni problemy suchasnosti: sotsialno-istorychnyi analiz) (Eng. The Main Problems of Modernity: Socio-Historical Analysis), Parapan, Kyiv.

Arendt Kh., 2002, Dzherela totalitaryzmu (Eng. Sources of Totalitarianism), Dukh i Litera, Kyiv.

Averianova N.M., Voropaieva T.S. 2019, Stratehiia «rozumnoi syly» v konteksti zbroinoho konfliktu v Ukraini (Eng. The ‘Smart Power’ Strategy in the Context of the Armed Conflict in Ukraine), Molodyi vchenyi, http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/molv_2019_8 %282% 29__8 (accessed: 20 May 2025).

Chong A., 2015, Smart Power and Military Force: An Introduction, Journal of Strategic Studies. 38(3), 233–244. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2014.1002915

Cohen W.S., Greenberg M.R., McGiffer C., 2009, Smart Power in U.S.-China Relations: A Report of the CSIS Commission on China, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/media/csis/pubs/090309_mcgiffert_uschinasmartpower_web.pdf (accessed: 24 May 2025).

Danylenko S., Averianova N., Voropaieva T., 2022, Stratehiia «rozumnoi syly» yak kliuchova peredumova peremohy v rosiisko-ukrainskii neoimperskii viini (Eng. The Strategy of ‘Smart Power’ as a Key Factor in the Victory in the Russian-Ukrainian Neo-Imperial War), Ukraiinoznavchyi almanakh, https://ukralmanac.univ.kiev.ua/index.php/ua/article/view/453 (accessed: 20 May 2025).

Eisenstadt, S. N., 1973. Tradition, Change, and Modernity. New York: Wiley., ISBN: 0471234710.

Gallarotti G.M., 2011, Soft Power: What it is, why it’s Important, and the Conditions for its Effective Use, Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 25–47. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886.

Lozovytskyi O., 2016, «Rozumna mohutnist» – stratehichna osnova zovnishnopolitychnoi ta oboronnoi skladovykh diievoho reformuvannia derzhavy v umovakh hlobalizatsii (Eng. ‘Smart Power’ is the Strategic Basis for the Foreign Policy and Defense structural reform of the state in the conditions of globalization), The Scientific Notes Publishing House, http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20& S21STN =1& S21FMT =ASP_meta&C21COM =S&2_S21P03 = Fila =&2_S21STR = Nzipiend_2016_5-6_10 (accessed: 15 May 2025).

Lyotard J.F. 1979, The State of Postmodernity. A Report on Knowledge, https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/lyotard.htm (accessed: 10 May 2025).

Makiaveli N., 1989, Derzhavets (Eng. The Statesman), https://chtyvo.org.ua/authors/Machiavelli_Niccolo/Derzhavets/ (accessed: 10 May 2025).

Medeiros S.E., Pinto D.J.A. 2015, International Reputation and Smart Power: How Brazil is Building its International insertion in the 21st century, In ISA’s 56th Annual Convention. New Orleans, Louisiana. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4827.6000

Mistseve samovriaduvannia, terytorialna orhanizatsiia vlady ta protsesy vidnovlennia, 2025, (Eng. Local Self-Government, Territorial Organization of Government and Processes of Renewal), Available at: https://rm.coe.int/coe-kiis-report-oct2024-ukr-f/1680b26e25 (accessed: 21 May 2024).

Nye J., 2003, The Power of Persuasion: Dual Components of US Leadership: The Conversation with, Harvard International Review, 390.

Nye J.S., 1990, Bound to Lead: Te Changing Nature of American Power, Basic Books, New York.

Nye J.S., 2011, The Future of Power, Public Affairs, New York.

Nye J.S., 2016, [T9.1] Leadership, https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11738396/Nye-Leadership.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed: 25 May 2025).

Pannwitz R., 1917, Die Krisis der europоischen Kultur (Eng. The crisis of European culture), Nоrnberg.

Pidtrymka naselenniam detsentralizatsii zalyshaietsia na rivni 77% – dani vseukrainskoho sotsiolohichnoho doslidzhennia, 2024 (Eng. Population Support for Decentralization Remains at 77% are the Data from the All-Ukrainian Sociological Study), https://decentralization.ua/news/18928 (accessed: 22 May 2025).

Reiterovych I., 2024[T10.1], Vid «hibrydnoi demokratii» do avtorytaryzmu – odyn krok (Eng. From ‘Hybrid Democracy’ to Authoritarianism is One Step), https://hromadske.radio/podcasts/zdorovyy-hluzd-shukaiemo-razom hromadskym-radio/ihor-reyterovych-vid-hibrydnoi-demokratii-do-avtorytaryzmu-odyn-krok (accessed: 21 May 2025).

Robespier M., 1989, Predstavnytske uriaduvannia (Eng. Representative Offices), Vsesvit, 7, 156–161.

Toynbee A.J., 1947, A Study of History, 2 Volumes, https://nobsword.blogspot.com/1993_10_17_nobsword_archive.html (accessed: 21 May 2025).

Tsentr Razumkova. Otsinka sytuatsii v kraini, dovira do sotsialnykh instytutiv, politykiv, posadovtsiv ta hromadskykh diiachiv, stavlennia do vyboriv pid chas viiny, vira v peremohu (liutyi-berezen 2025), 2025, (Eng. Razumkov’s Center. Assessment of the Situation in the Country, Trust in social Institutions, Politicians, Officials and public figures, attitude to Elections During the War, Trust in Victory (From July to March 2025), https://razumkov.org.ua/napriamky/sotsiologichni-doslidzhennia/otsinka-sytuatsii-v-kraini-dovira-do-sotsialnykh-instytutiv-politykiv-posadovtsiv-ta-gromadskykh-diiachiv-stavlennia-do-vyboriv-pid-chas-viiny-vira-v-peremogu-liutyiberezen-2025r (accessed: 15 May 2025).

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Novachenko, T. (2025). The Smart Power Tradition in the Conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian War Using the Example of Local Self-Government. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 15(3), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2025.3.06

Issue

Section

Articles