The archetype of barrier-freeness in the institutional culture of the civil service: A sociocultural analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2026.2.04

Keywords:

Sbarrier-freeness, civil service, institutional culture, HR policy, sociocultural analysis, inclusive management, archetype, public sector transformation, human-centredness

Abstract

This article provides a sociocultural analysis of barrier-freeness as a fundamental archetype of the contemporary institutional culture of the civil service. Against the backdrop of large-scale social transformations, including digitalisation, demographic change, and the consequences of social crises, public institutions are increasingly required to reconsider their role as inclusive employers and service-oriented partners of society. The article argues that barrier-freeness should not be reduced to technical solutions or the physical accessibility of public spaces. Rather, it should be understood as a deep cultural orientation that entails a shift in the management paradigm from bureaucratic control towards human-centred governance. The study examines changes in value orientations within public organisations and analyses how the archetype of barrier-freeness can reshape human resource management, including recruitment, professional development, internal communication, and performance evaluation. The analysis indicates that sustainable transformation of the public sector requires a barrier-free institutional ecosystem in which employees have equitable access to organisational resources, information, participation, and career development. The article proposes practical mechanisms for diagnosing organisational barriers and overcoming them through inclusive HR practices, empathic leadership, and psychological safety. It concludes that barrier-freeness is not only an ethical imperative but also an important condition for the resilience and adaptive capacity of public institutions under conditions of high uncertainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonin, E. A., & Martynov, A. Yu. (2019). Archetype as a source of innovation process. Public Management, 3(18), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2019-18-3-28-42

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2021). On approval of the National Strategy for Creating a Barrier-Free Environment in Ukraine for the period until 2030 (Order No. 366-r, April 14, 2021). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/366-2021-%D1%80?lang=en

Donchenko, O., & Romanenko, Yu. (2001). Archetypes of social life and politics: Deep regulators of psychopolitical everyday life. Lybid. [In Ukrainian]

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the globalization of democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231532

Honcharuk, N. T. (2018). Development of the civil service in Ukraine: Theory, methodology, practice. NAPA under the President of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]

Jung, C. G. (1969). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Princeton University Press.

Krause, A., Rinne, U., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2012). Anonymous job applications in Europe. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 1, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9012-1-5

Malinovsky, V. Ya. (2020). Dictionary of terms and concepts in public administration. Center for Promoting Institutional Development of the Civil Service. [In Ukrainian]

Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Sage.

Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861684

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262-1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943

Ulrich, D. (1997). Human resource champions: The next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Harvard Business School Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-24

How to Cite

Gavkalova, N., & Baranovskyi, D. (2026). The archetype of barrier-freeness in the institutional culture of the civil service: A sociocultural analysis. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 16(2), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2026.2.04

Issue

Section

Articles