Cannabis consumers in Poland

Authors

  • Andrzej Matczak University of Łódź
  • Przemysław Adam Pawlicki University of Łódź

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2019.2.04

Keywords:

consumer characteristics, regional differentiation, cannabis, Poland

Abstract

The purpose of this study is an attempt to answer the following questions: (1) Is there a regional differentiation of cannabis consumers in Poland? (2) What is the scale of this differentiation? (3) What factors affect this differentiation? Our empirical study is based on the analysis of an anonymous online survey. The coefficient of variation, taxonomic measures of similarity, synthetic index and Spearman correlation coefficient are used in the analysis. It is observed that cannabis consumption in Poland is most popular among men, youth and young adults (Generation Y), as well as among those who are well-educated, relatively well-off and live in cities. The structure of selected demographic and socio-economic features of the respondents is poorly differentiated regionally. Regional differentiation in the structure of cannabis consumption frequency is at an average level. The spatial distribution of features characterizing the respondents is highly consistent with the spatial distribution of city dwellers aged 15–44, their sex and 5-year age ranges, the level of education, the size of cities and the level of gross domestic product.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Czapiński J., Panek T. (eds.), 2015, Diagnoza społeczna 2015. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków (Eng. Social diagnosis 2015. Objective and subjective quality of life in Poland), Rada Monitoringu Społecznego, Warsaw.

EMCDDA, 2008, A cannabis reader: global issues and local experiences, Monograph series 8, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon.

EMCDDA, 2016, European drug report. Trends and developments, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

EMCDDA, 2018, European drug report. Trends and developments, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

EMCDDA, 2019, European drug report. Trends and developments, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Griffiths P., Quigley E., Vandam L., Mounteney J., 2018, The challenge of responding to a more globally joined-up, dynamic, and innovative drug market: reflections from the EMCDDA´s 2018 analysis of the European drug situation, The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 31, 231–237. doi: 10.5350/DAJPN20183103001.

Jędrzejko M., 2011, Marihuana FAKTY. Marihuana MITY (Eng. Marihuana FACTS. Marihuana MYTHS), Mazowieckie Centrum Profilaktyki Uzależnień i Wrocławskie & Wydawnictwo Naukowe Atla 2, Wrocław.

Kang S.K., O’Leary J., Miller J., 2016, From forbidden fruit to the goose that lays golden eggs: marijuana tourism in Colorado, SAGE Open, 6, 1–12.

Kłos J., Nowicki P., Żaba Cz., Kokot Z., 2010, Szacowanie spożycia środków odurzających z grupy amfetamin przez mieszkańców miasta Poznania (Eng. Estimation of consumption of amphetamine-type stimulants in Poznan, Poland), Nowiny Lekarskie, 79, 351–355.

Malczewski A., Misiurek A., Bukowska B., Chojecki D., Jabłońska P., Kidawa M., Leszczyńska M., Poleganow A., Radomska A., Struzik M., Stawecka E., Strzelecka A., Twierdziańska A., Walichnowska M. (eds.), 2015, National drug report 2014 Poland, Krajowe Biuro ds.. Przeciwdziałania Narkomanii, Warsaw.

Matczak A., Pawlicki P. A., 2016, Cannabis indica as a motivation for foreign travel by Polish citizens, Turyzm/Tourism, 26, 49–57.

Morrison Ch., Gruenewald P.J., Freisthler B., Ponicki W.R, Remer L.G., 2014, The economic geography of medical cannabis dispensaries in California, International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 508–515. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.009.

Motyka M., Marcinkowski J.T., 2014, Dlaczego będą zażywać? Część III: Uwarunkowania sprzyjające dynamice zjawiska narkomanii (Eng. Why will use drugs? Part III. Conditions conducive to the dynamics of the drug phenomenon), Problemy Higieny i Epidemiologii, 95, 243–249.

Mróz M., 2012, Marihuana: między dekryminalizacją a legalizacją. Przegląd wybranych rozwiązań – Czechy, Holandia, Hiszpania, Urugwaj i Kalifornia (Eng. Marihuana: between decriminalization and legalization: a review of selected solutions – the Czech Republic, Netherlands, Spain, Uruguay and California), Analizy BAS, 20, 1–6.

Ort C., van Nuijs A.L.N., Berset J.-D., Bijlsma L., Castiglioni S., Covaci A., de Voogt P., Emke E., Fatta-Kassinos D., Griffiths P., Hernández F., González-Mariño I., Grabic R., KasprzykHordern B., Mastroianni N., Meierjohann A., Nefau T., Östman M., Pico Y., Racamonde I., Reid M., Slobodnik J., Terzic S., Thomaidis N., Thomas K.V., 2014, Spatial differences and temporal changes in illicit drug use in Europe quantified by wastewater analysis: wastewater data covering 24.74 million people, Addiction, 109, 1338–1352. doi: 10.1111/add.12570.

Richardson D., 2008, Foreword. Making connections: geography and drug addiction, [in:] Y. Thomas, D. Richardson, I. Cheung (eds.), Geography and drug addiction, Springer, Berlin, v–vii.

Rogacki H., 2009, Dynamika i przekształcenia strukturalne turystycznej bazy noclegowej w Polsce w ujęciu przestrzennym (Eng. Dynamics and structural transformation of the tourist accommodation base in Poland: a regional approach), Folia Turistica, 21, 203–220.

Runge J., 2006, Metody badań w geografii społecznoekonomicznej – elementy metodologii, wybrane narzędzia badawcze, (Eng. Research methods in socio-economic geography – elements of methodology, selected research tools), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, Katowice.

Sierosławski J., Malczewski A., Misiurek A., Strzelecka A., Jędruszczak Ł., Leszczyńska M., 2015, Substancje psychoaktywne – postawy i zachowania. Raport z ogólnopolskich badań zrealizowanych w 2014 r. (Eng. Psychoactive substances – attitudes and behavior. Report on national surveys carried out in 2014), CBOS, Warsaw.

Taylor J.S., Jasparro Ch., Mattson K., 2013, Geographers and drugs: a survey of the literature, The Geographical Review, 103, 415–430.

UNODC, 2011, Estimating illicit financial flows resulting from drug trafficking and other transnational organized crime. Research report, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Vienna.

UNODC, 2016, World drug report 2016, United Nations publication, Sales No. E.16.XI.7, New York.

Wieczorek Ł., Sierosławski J., Dąbrowska K., 2018, Changes in use and availability of cannabis among adolescents over last two decades. Situation in Poland and selected European countries, Alcoholism and Drug Addiction/Alkoholizm i Narkomania, 31, 49–64.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Matczak, A., & Pawlicki, . P. A. (2019). Cannabis consumers in Poland. Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, 9(2), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.26881/jpgs.2019.2.04

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)