Good teaching practices on the example of chemistry teaching in non-chemistry studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.03Keywords:
teaching, higher education, activating methods, chemistryAbstract
The article examines the primary pedagogical challenges currently en-countered by university educators and explores selected instructional methods that can enhance the quality of education. It outlines specific strategies and interventions designed to increase student engagement during classes, with a particular focus on the case study involving Chemistry lectures for Sanitary Engineering students in the Environ-mental Engineering program within civil construction. The positive outcomes, both in terms of activating student participation and im-proving learning efficiency, were corroborated over several years of ob-servation. The findings demonstrate that, with an appropriate peda-gogical approach, it is possible not only to impart knowledge but also to foster engagement, motivation, and positive relationships that con-tribute to the holistic development of students. The article highlights the importance of continuous improving of educators’ teaching com-petencies and adapting curricula and instructional methods in order to meet the rapidly evolving demands of the labour market.
Downloads
References
Anis, Muneeba (2024). “Teacher professional development in the Dig-ital Age: Addressing the evolving needs post-COVID”. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research 6/1: 1–14.
Arsyad, Muhammad, Saut Guna, Sebastian Barus (2024). “Enhancing chemistry education through problem-based learning: Analyzing student engagement, motivation, and critical thinking”. Interna-tional Journal of Curriculum Development Teaching and Learning In-novation 2/3: 110–117.
Carless, David, Jessica To, Connie Kwan, Jonathan Kwok (2020). “Dis-ciplinary perspectives on feedback processes: Towards signature feedback practices”. Teaching in Higher Education 28/6: 1158–72.
Dingel, Molly J., Gemma Punti (2023). “Building faculty-student rela-tionships in higher education”. Mentoring and Tutoring 31/1: 1–22.
Khahro, Shabir Hussain, Yasir Javed (2022). “Key challenges in 21st century learning: A way forward towards sustainable higher educa-tional institutions”. Sustainability 14/23: 16080.
Marchak, Debora, Inna Shvarts-Serebro, Ron Blonder (2021). “Teach-ing chemistry by a creative approach: Adapting a teachers’ course for active remote learning”. Journal of Chemical Education 98: 2809–2819.
Nabi, Ghulam, Andreas Walmsley, Mahmood Mir, Sonny Osman (2024). “The impact of mentoring in higher education on student career development: A systematic review and research agenda”. Studies in Higher Education June: 1–17.
Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2019). “Framework for 21st cen-tury learning” Available online: https://static.battelleforkids.org/ documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2024).
Qi, YiFei, CaiHua An, Chao Huang, HongChun Lv, HongHui Zhang (2024). “Enhancing critical thinking in vocational chemistry educa-tion: Active learning strategies in vocational training”. Journal of Chemical Education, https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jchemed.4c00 887.
Rahman, Azlinah Sahid Abdul, Nasri Sheerad, Mohamad Nurfaradilla (2022). “Literature review on the benefits and challenges of active learning on students’ achievement”. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 17/12: 4856–4868.
Sewagegn, Abatihun Alehegn (2020). “Learning objective and assess-ment linkage: Its contribution to meaningful students learning”. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8/11: 5044–5052.