Rola strategii utrzymywania tury konwersacyjnej w quasi-synchronicznej tekstowej komunikacji internetowej

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2022.3.03

Słowa kluczowe:

komunikacja internetowa, entropia informacyjna, przejmowanie tur konwersacyjnych, przetwarzanie zdań

Abstrakt

Niniejszy artykuł rozważa wpływ formy tur konwersacyjnych w quasi-synchronicznej tekstowej komunikacji internetowej. Wcześniejsze ba-dania zauważyły, że rozmówcy w owym rodzaju komunikacji realizują tury konwersacyjne na dwa sposoby: bądź w postaci jednej długiej wiadomości, bądź w serii kilku krótszych wiadomości. W tym artykule stawiana jest hipoteza, że druga strategia ułatwia zarządzanie procesem konwersacji (przewidywanie końca tury, inicjowanie napraw konwersacyjnych) i obniża koszty związane z przetwarzaniem zdań (poprzez stopniową integrację wiadomości oraz zmniejszenie entropii informacyjnej). Aby zweryfikować hipotezy, przeprowadzono jedno badanie. O ile eksperyment nie wykazał istotnego statystycznie wpływu formatu tur konwersacyjnych na sukces komunikacyjny, o tyle dane sugerują, iż format ma istotny wpływ na wspólny wysiłek komunikacyjny – na korzyść krótszych wiadomości.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Anderson, Anne H., Miles Bader, Ellen G. Bard, Elizabeth Boyle, Gwyneth Doherty, Simon Garrod, Stephen Isard, Jacqueline Kowtko, Jan McAllister, Jim Miller, Catherine Sotillo, Henry S. Thompson, Regina Weinert (1991). “The Hcrc map task corpus”. Language and Speech 34/4: 351–366.

Anderson, Jeffrey, Fred Beard, Joseph Walther (2010). “Turn-taking and the local management of conversation in a highly simultane-ous computer-mediated communication system”. Language@In-ternet 7. Available at <https://www.languageatinternet.org/ articles/2010/2804>. Accessed 20.10.2021.

Baron, Naomi S. (2010). “Discourse structures in instant messaging: the case of utterance breaks”. Language@Internet 7/4. Available at <http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-7-26514>. Accessed 20.10.2021.

Bavelas, Janet, Linda Coates, Trudy Johnson (2002). “Listener responses as a collaborative process: the role of gaze”. Journal of Communication 52: 566–580.

Beattie, Geoffrey W., Anne Cutler, Mark Pearson (1982). “Why is Mrs Thatcher interrupted so often?” Nature 300: 744–747.

Bird, Steve, Ewan Klein, Edward Loper (2009). Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastpol: O’Reilly.

Branigan, H. P., C. L. Gibb (2018). “Structural priming”. In: Annette M. B. de Groot, Peter Hagoort (eds.). Research Methods in Psycho-linguistics and the Neurobiology of Language: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Wiley, 130–150.

Chafe, Wallace L. (1987). “Cognitive constraints on information flow”. In: Russell S. Tomlin (ed.). Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 21–51.

Chafe, Wallace L. (1980). “The deployment of consciousness in the construction of narrative”. In: Wallace L. Chafe (ed.). The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 9–50.

Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clark, Herbert H., Susan E. Brennan (1991). “Grounding in communication”. In: L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, S. D. Teasley (eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association, 127–149.

Clark, Herbert H., Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs (1986). “Referring as a collaborative process”. Cognition 22/1: 1–39.

Cutler, Anne, Mark Pearson (1986). “On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues”. In: Catherine Johns-Lewis (ed.). Intonation in Discourse. London: Routledge.

Ford, Cecilia, Sandra Thompson (1996). “Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns”. In: Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sandra A. Thompson (eds.). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–184.

Gambi, Chiara, Torsten K. Jachmann, Maria Staudte (2015). “Listen, look, go! The role of prosody and gaze in turnend anticipation”. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2015, Pasadena, California, USA, July 22-25, 2015.

Garcia, Angela, Jennifer B. Jacobs (1998). “The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom”. Qualitative Sociology 21/3: 299–317.

Garcia, Angela, Jennifer B. Jacobs (1999). “The eyes of the beholder: understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 32/4: 337–367.

Genzel, Dmitriy, Eugene Charniak (2002). “Entropy rate constancy in text”. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’02), 199–206.

Gibson, Will J. (2014). “Sequential order in multimodal discourse: Talk and text in online educational interaction”. Discourse & Communication 8/1: 63–83.

Grice, H. Paul (1975). “Logic and conversation”. In: Peter Cole, Jerry Morgan (eds.). Speech Acts [Syntax and Semantics 3]. New York: Academic Press, 41–58.

Herring, Susan (1999). “Interactional coherence in CMC”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 4/4: Article 4.

Jaeger, T. Florian (2010). “Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density”. Cognitive Psychology 61/1: 23–62.

Jaeger, T. Florian, Harry J. Tily (2011). “On language ‘utility’: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency”. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 2/3: 323–335.

Kendon, Adam (1967). “Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction”. Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63.

Levinson, Stephen C., Francisco Torreira (2015). “Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language”. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 731.

Oliveira, Miguel, Tiago Freitas (2008). “Intonation as a cue to turn management in telephone and face-to-face interactions”. Speech Prosody 2008: 485–488.

Pickering, Martin J., Simon Garrod (2004). “Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27/2: 169–190.

Pickering, Martin J., Simon Garrod (2013a). “An integrated theory of language production and comprehension”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36/4: 329–347.

Pickering, Martin J., Simon Garrod (2013b). “Forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36/4: 377–392.

Qian, Ting, T. Florian Jaeger (2012). “Cue effectiveness in communicatively efficient discourse production”. Cognitive Science 36/7: 1312–1336.

Riordan, Monica A., Kris M. Markman, Craig O. Stewart (2013). “Communication accommodation in instant messaging: An examination of temporal convergence”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32/1: 84–95.

Rossano, Frederico (2012). “Gaze in conversation”. In: Jack Sidnell, Tanya Stivers (eds.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. John Wiley Sons, Ltd., 308-329.

Rühlemann, Christoph, Stefan T. Gries (2020). “Speakers advance-project turn completion by slowing down: A multifactorial corpus analysis”. Journal of Phonetics 80: 100976.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (1974). “A simple systematic for the organisation of turn taking in conversation”. Language 50: 696–735.

Schaffer, Deborah (1983). “The role of intonation as a cue to turn taking in conversation”. Journal of Phonetics 11/3: 243–257.

Schönfeldt, Juliane, Andrea Golato (2003). “Repair in chats: a conversation analytic approach”. Research on Language and Social Inter-action 36: 241–284.

Shannon, C. E. (1948). “A mathematical theory of communication”. Bell System Technical Journal 27/3: 379–423.

Simpson, James (2005). “Conversational floors in synchronous text-based CMC discourse”. Discourse Studies 7/3: 337–361.

The ImageMagick Development Team (2021). ImageMagick (7.0.10) [Computer software]. Available at <https://imagemagick.org>. Accessed 01.10.2021.

Thompson, Henry S., Anne Anderson, Ellen G. Bard, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, Alison Newlands, Cathy Sotillo (1993). “The HCRC map task corpus: natural dialogue for speech recognition”. Human Language Technology: Proceedings of a Workshop. New Jersey.

Tudini, Vincenza (2015). “Extending prior posts in dyadic online text chat”. Discourse Processes 52/8: 642–669.

Uthus, David C., David W. Aha (2013). “The Ubuntu chat corpus for multiparticipant chat analysis”. In: AAAI Spring Symposium – Technical Report, 99–102.

Van Rossum, Guido, Fred L. Drake (2009). Python 3 Reference Manual. Scotts Valley: CreateSpace.

Xu, Yang, David Reitter (2016). “Entropy converges between dialogue participants: explanations from an information-theoretic perspective”. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Volume 1: Long Papers, 537–546.

Zemel, Alan (2005). Texts-in-interaction: collaborative problem-solving in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication”. In: Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years!, 753–757.

Zlatev, Jordan, Sławomir Wacewicz, Przemysław Żywiczyński, Joost van de Weijer (2017). “Multimodal-first or pantomime-first? Communicating events through pantomime with and without vocalization”. Interaction Studies 18: 454–477.

Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz, Sylwester Orzechowski (2017). “Adaptors and the turn-taking mechanism: the distribution of adaptors relative to turn borders in dyadic conversation”. Interaction Studies 18: 276–298.

Opublikowane

2022-10-18

Jak cytować

Placiński, M. (2022). Rola strategii utrzymywania tury konwersacyjnej w quasi-synchronicznej tekstowej komunikacji internetowej. Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, (19/3), 54–84. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2022.3.03

Numer

Dział

Linguistics