Academic Scientific JournalsInfinitive-gerund alternations in Polish post-verbal complementation: a corpus-based study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2022.1.01Keywords:
complementation, gerund, infinitive, syntactic alternationsAbstract
The paper constitutes a contribution to semantically based research on the so called ‘syntactic alternations’, defined as “structurally and/or lexically different ways to say functionally very similar things” (Gries 2017: 8). More specifically, the study is concerned with Polish verbal predicates which accept both the gerundive and infinitival complement, with the difference between these two alternatives being a matter of construal or focus rather than any clear-cut semantic contrasts. Taking as its point of departure the cognitive linguistic thesis that a change in form always entails a change in meaning, the present paper seeks to determine the factors that significantly affect the choice of one or the other complement type in situations where both are fully acceptable. The study provides an in-depth, corpus-based analysis of three selected pairs of constructions, and offers a new theory (referred to as reduced-increased involvement theory) to explain the choices that Polish speakers make with respect to the two constructions in question.
Downloads
References
Bolinger, Dwight (1968). “Entailment and the meaning of structures”. Glossa 2: 119–127.
Bresnan, Joan (1979). Theory of Complementation in English Syntax. New York: Garland.
Deshors, Sandra C. (2015). “A constructionist approach to gerundial and infinitival verb complementation patterns in native and Hong Kong English varieties”. English Text Construction 8/2: 207–235.
Deshors, Sandra C., Stefan Th. Gries (2016). “Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forest analysis of ing vs. to complements”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21/2: 192–218.
Dirven, René (1989). “A Cognitive Perspective on Complementation”. In: Dany Jaspers, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys, Pieter Seuren (eds.). Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 113–139.
Goldberg, Adele (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele (2006). Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Givón, Talmy (1980). “The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements”. Studies in Language 4: 333–377.
Givón, Talmy (2001). Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gries, Stefan Th., Anatol Stefanowitsch (2004). “Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on 'alternations'”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9/1: 97–129.
Gries, Stefan Th. (2017). “Syntactic alternation research. Taking stock and some suggestions for the future”. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31: 8–29.
Harris, Zellig S. (1954). “Distributional Structure”. WORD 10/2-3: 146-162.
Kaleta, Agnieszka (2012). “The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: the case of aspectual constructions”. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings, Volume 1: 323–34.
Kaleta, Agnieszka (2014). English Sentential Complementation: A Usage-based Approach. Piotrków Tryb.: Naukowe Wydawnictwo Piotrkowskie.
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. (1990). Contrasting Languages: The Scope of Contrastive Linguistics. Berlin – New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker. Ronald W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noonan, Michael (1985). “Complementation”. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.). Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 42-140.
Rudanko, Juhani (2017). Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English: Studies of Non-Finite Complements with Data from Large Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rudanko, Juhani (2011). Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-based Studies on Non-finite Complements in Recent English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rudanko, Juhani (2021). Infinitival vs Gerundial Complementation with Afraid, Accustomed, and Prone. Multivariate Corpus Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, Michael B. (2008). “The semantics of complementation in English: A cognitive semantic account of two English complement constructions”. Language Sciences 31: 360–388.
Smith, Michael B., Joyce Escobedo (2001). “The semantics of to-infinitival vs -ing verb complement constructions in English”. In: Mary Andronies, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston, Sylvain Neuvel (eds.). Proceedings from the Main Session in the Chicago Linguistic Society's Thirty-seventh Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 549–64.
Taylor, John, Rene Dirven (1991). Complementation. Duisburg: LAUD Linguistics Agency, University of Duisburg.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, Stefan Th. Gries (2003). “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8/2: 209-43.
Wierzbicka, Anna (1988). The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
