Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweThe Recast Civil Procedure and Legacy of Franz Klein in the Slovak Republic
Słowa kluczowe:
civil procedure, Franz Klein, Slovak RepublicAbstrakt
The year 2016 witnessed the completion of a next chapter in the history of civil procedure in the Slovak Republic. As of 1 July 2016, three new procedural codes entered into force, replacing the previously applicable Civil Procedure Code of 1963. The ambition of the legislator was primarily to (re-)build the civil judicial procedure on solid theoretical principles and mainly on the basis of so-called social conception of procedural law, as advocated in Central European tradition in particular by Franz Klein, author of the Austrian Civil Procedure Code of the late 19th century. Major events such as recasting of procedural codes certainly represent an opportunity to look back and to assess the overall continuity or discontinuity of the legal regulation being (re-) codified. This is also the case with the recast civil procedure in the Slovak Republic.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Berti, S. V., (2011), Einführung in die schweizerische Zivilprozessordnung, Helbing Lichtenhahn Verlag, Basel.
Bratković, M., Goals of civil justice and civil procedure in contemporary judicial systems, in Zbornik Pravnog Fakulteta u Zagrebu, 64, 2, 333-338.
Cadiet, L., (2012), Judicial case management in France-Tradition into modernity: About some aspects of contemporary tendencies in French civil procedure, in Chinese and Comparative Law Series, 1, 541-562.
Canale, D., (2009), The Many Faces of the Codification of Law in Modern Continental Europe, in Canale, D., Grossi, P., Hofmann, H. (eds.), (2009), A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Civil Law World, 1600–1900, Springer, Dordrecht.
Češka, Z., (1989), Československé občanské právo procesní (Czechoslovak Civil Procedural Law), Panorama, Praha.
David, L., (2012), Na hranicích práva. Soudcovské eseje (At the borders of law. Judicial essays), Leges, Praha.
Drápal, Lj., Bureš, J. et al., (2009), Občanský soudní řád I. Komentář (Civil Procedure Code I. Commentary), C. H. Beck, Praha.
Fasching, H. W., (1984), Lehrbuch des österreichischen Zivilprozessrecht, MANZ, Wien.
Fasching, H. W., (1988), Die Weiterentwicklung des österreichischen Zivilprozessrecht im Lichte der Ideen Franz Kleins`, in Hofmeister, H. (ed.), (1988), Forschungsband Franz Klein (1854-1926). Leben und Wirken, Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, Wien.
Ficová, S., (2016), Civil Litigation Procedure – a New Code of Procedure of the Slovak Republic, in International and Comparative Law Review, 16, 1, 23-37.
Filo, J. et al., (1981), Československé pracovné právo (Czechoslovak labor law), Obzor, Bratislava.
Gilles, P., (2014), Civil justice systems and civil procedures in a changing world: Main problems, fundamental reforms and perspectives – A European view, in Russian Law Journal, 2, 1, 41-56.
Hamuľáková, K., (2016), Funding of Collective Actions, in International and Comparative Law Review, 16, 2, 127-144.
Hora, V., (2010), Československé civilní právo procesní I-III. (Czechoslovak Civil Procedural Law I-III), Wolters Kluwer, Praha (first published in Praha 1932 and 1934).
Kengyel, M., (2005), Der Einfluss der österreichischen Zivilprozessordnung auf die ungarische Kodifikation, in Bittner, L., Klicka, Th., Kodek, G. E., Oberhammer, P., (eds.), (2005), Festschrift für Walter H. Rechberger zum 60. Geburtstag, Springer, Wien, 239 ff.
Klerman, D., (2015), The Economics of Civil Procedure, in Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11, 3, 353-371.
Knapp, V., (1993), Přínos středoevropského soudnictví k evropské právní kultuře (Contribution of Central European judiciary to European legal culture), in Právník, 9, 725 ff.
Knapp, V., (1995), Teorie práva (Theory of law), C. H. Beck, Praha.
Kotrecová, A., Števček, M., (2017), Ako poznať dobrú právnu úpravu alebo od zabezpečovacích opatrení k analytickej právnej epistemológii, in Právny obzor, 2.
Kroppenberg, I., Linder, N., (2014), Coding the Nation. Codification History from a (Post-) Global Perspective, in Duve, Th. (ed.), (2014), Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches, Global Perspectives on Legal History, Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt am Main, 75-79.
Lavický, P. et al., (2014), Moderní civilní proces (A modern civil process), Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
Lavický, P., Dvořák, B., (2015), “Pro futuro”, in Právní rozhledy, 5, 156 ff.
Macur, J., (1988), Soudnictví a soudní právo (The judiciary and judicial law), UJEP, Brno.
Macur, J., (1991), Povinnost a odpovědnost v občanském právu procesním (The obligation and responsibility in the civil procedure), Masarykova univerzita, Brno.
Mayr, P. G., Fucik, R., (2013), Verfahren ausser Streitsachen, Facultas, Wien.
Melzer, F., (2008), Metodologie nalézání práva (Methodology of establishing law), Knihovnička, Brno, 2008.
Ott, E., (1897), Soustavný úvod ve studium nového řízení soudního (The systematic introduction into the study of new judicial proceedings), Česká akademie císaře Františka Josefa pro vědy, slovesnost a umění, Praha.
Radbruch, G. (2003), Rechtsphilosophie. Studienausgabe. 2nd ed., C. F. Müller Verlag, Heidelberg.
Ratica, J., (1948), Základy procesného práva (The fundaments of procedural law), Právnická fakulta Slovenskej Univerzity v Bratislave, Bratislava.
Rechberger, W. H. (2008), Die Ideen Franz Kleins und ihre Bedeutung für die Entwicklung des Zivilprozessrecht in Europa, in Ritsumeikan Law Review, 25, 101 ff.
Rosenberg, L., Schwab, K. H., Gottwald, P., (2010), Zivilprozessrecht. 17th ed., C.H.Beck, München.
Roth, M., Holzhammer, R., Holly, A., (2012), Zivilprozessrecht. MANZ, Wien.
Rubeš, J. et al., (1958), Komentár k občianskemu súdnemu poriadku. I. diel (Commentary on the Code of Civil Procedure. Vol. I.), Osveta, Bratislava.
Stavinohová, J. (1984), Problém diferenciace řízení sporného a nesporného v socialistickém civilním procesu (The problem of differentiation between contentious and non-contentious litigation), Universita J. E. Purkyně v Brně, Brno.
Stavinohová, J., (1998), Občanské právo procesní. Řízení nalézací (Civil procedural law. First instance proceedings), Doplněk, Brno.
Störig, H.-J., (1993), Malé dějiny filozofie (Brief history of philosophy), Zvon, Praha.
Štajgr, F., (1969), Některé teoretické otázky civilního práva procesního (Some theoretical issues of civil procedure law), in Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Iuridica, Monographia X, Univerzita Karlova, Praha.
Števček, M., (2009), K problematike tzv. kauzálnej príslušnosti niektorých slovenských súdov (On the issue of so-called causal jurisdiction of Slovak courts), in Justičná revue, 6-7, 852-860.
Števček, M., (2017), Zmier z pohľadu teórie procesných úkonov, in Justičná revue, 5.
Tilsch, E., (2016), Aforismy a myšlenky (Aphorisms and thoughts), Právnická jednota v Praze, Praha.
Tulibacka, M., (2009), Europeanization of civil procedures: In search of a coherent approach, in Common Market Law Review, 46, 5, 1527-1565.
van Caenegem, R. C., (2006), History of European Civil Procedure, in Cappelletti, M., (ed.), (2006), Civil Procedure, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen, 88 ff.
van Rhee C. H., Verkerk, R., (2006), Civil procedure, in Smits, J. M. (ed.), (2006), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
van Rhee, C. H., (2008), Judicial Case Management and Efficiency in Civil Litigation, Springer, Antwerpen.
van Rhee, C. H., (2000), Civil Procedure: An Academic Subject?, in Heirbaut, D., Lambrecht, D. (eds.), (2000), The Use of Legal History in the Teaching of Contemporary Law, Brussels, 67-77.
van Rhee, C. H., (2007a), Civil litigation in twentieth century Europe, in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 75, 3, 307-318.
van Rhee, C. H., (2007b), De rol van de burgerlijke rechter in de negentiende eeuw: ‘Case-management’ avant la lettre in Genève, Nederland en België, in Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, 75, 2, 189-197.
Zoulík, F., (1969), Řízení sporné a nesporné jako druhy civilního procesu (Contentious and non-contentious litigation as types of civil procedure), Academia, Praha.
Zuckerman, A. A. S., (1994), Quality and economy in civil procedure: The case for commuting correct judgments for timely judgments, in Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 14, 3, 353-387.
