Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweResilience, sense of self-efficacy, and risk-taking in the context of task performance during ship simulator training
Słowa kluczowe:
risk, simulator, resilience, self-efficacy, shipAbstrakt
Background:
Educating sailors requires intensive training, which involves highly specialized ship simulators. This is due to the crew’s responsibility for the safety of the people on board and the simultaneous risk of making improper decisions under time pressure and with insufficient data. Thus far, empirical data on the role of personal psychological resources in the process of sailor skills training have been lacking.
Participants and procedure:
Fifty cadets of the Navigation and Naval Weapons Faculty and 51 cadets of the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Faculty of the Polish Naval Academy in Gdynia, Poland, participated in the study. Task performance during ship simulator training was assessed. Additionally, the participants completed the General Self-Efficacy Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, the Questionnaire of Stimulating and Instrumental Risk, and the Status-Driven Risk Taking Scale.
Results:
Three subgroups were distinguished based on their levels of task performance and the psychological variables measured. Cadets who achieved the highest task performance during simulator training simultaneously reported the highest sense of self-efficacy and resilience, average acceptance of instrumental risk, status-driven risk and its subdimensions, as well as the highest acceptance of stimulating risk.
Conclusions:
Individual differences such as resilience, sense of self-efficacy, and risk acceptance have a different configuration among individuals who achieved the highest task performance on ship simulators. Identifying individuals with the optimal configuration of these variables may be useful for designing education and development processes for officers, although this requires further studies.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Akyuz, E. (2015). A hybrid accident analysis method to assess potential navigational contingencies: The case of ship grounding. Safety Science, 79, 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.06.019
Al Issa, H. E. (2021). Advancing entrepreneurial career success: The role of passion, persistence, and risktaking propensity. Entrepreneurial Business & Economics Review, 9, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090209
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Pozzebon, J. A., Visser, B. A., & Worth, N. C. (2010). Status-driven risk taking and the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 734–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.09.003
Atłas, K. (2022). Temperamentalne i osobowościowe podłoże codziennego heroizmu [Temperamental and personality background of everyday heroism]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Avci, S. (2022). Investigation of the individual characteristics that predict academic resilience. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9, 543–556. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1076091
Berry, J. W., Elliott, T. R., & Rivera, P. (2007). Resilient, undercontrolled, and overcontrolled personality prototypes among persons with spinal cord injury. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701629813
Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (2012). Management of psychosocial risks at work: an analysis of the findings of the European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER) European Risk Observatory Report. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/esener-psychosocial-risks.pdf
Geier, C., & Luna, B. (2009). The maturation of incentive processing and cognitive control. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, 93, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2009.01.021
Goddard, K., Roudsari, A., & Wyatt, J. C. (2011). Automation bias – a hidden issue for clinical decision support system use. International Perspectives in Health Informatics, 164, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-709-3-17
Grech, M. R., Horberry, T., & Smith, A. (2002, September). Human error in maritime operations: Analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46, 1718–1721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931202046019
Guillén, L. (2021). When (and why) job self-efficacy does not promote career success: The roles of resilience and organizational prototypicality. Human Relations, 74, 1267–1295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720912309
Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020). Resilience in the workplace: a multilevel review and synthesis. Applied Psychology, 69, 913–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12191
Hejmlich, A. (2022). Impact of psychological components of human factors on the probability of committing an error during ship handling in restricted waters. Scientific Journals of The Maritime University of Szczecin, 72, 42–49. https://doi.org/10.17402/532
Juczyński, Z. (2012). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia [Measurement tools in promotion and health psychology]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Jurek, K., & Niewiadomska, I. (2021). Relationship between psychological capital and quality of life among seniors working after retirement: The mediating role of hope of success. PLoS One, 16, e0259273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259273
Knight, K., Holcom, M., & Simpson, D. D. (1994). TCU Psychosocial Functioning and Motivation Scales: Manual on psychometric properties. Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
Kojs, W., & Urban-Kojs, E. (2010). Społeczne, osobowe i pedagogiczne aspekty edukacji całożyciowej człowieka [Social, personal and pedagogical aspects of human lifelong education]. In E. Syrek (Ed.), Czas społeczny akademickiego uczestnictwa w rozwoju i doskonaleniu civil society: księga jubileuszowa dedykowana profesorowi Andrzejowi Radziewiczowi-Winnickiemu w 65. rocznicę urodzin [The social time of academic participation in the development and improvement of civil society: a jubilee book dedicated to Professor Andrzej Radziewicz-Winnicki on his 65th birthday] (pp. 312–324). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Konaszewski, K., Niesiobędzka, M., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2020). Validation of the Polish version of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS). PLoS One, 15, e0237038. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237038
Lejuez, C. W., Read, J. P., Kahler, C. W., Richards, J. B., Ramsey, S. E., Stuart, G. L., Strong, D. R., & Brown, R. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.75
Lipińska-Grobelny, A., & Zwardoń-Kuchciak, O. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (KKaPsy). Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 11, 162–173. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.112374
Makarowski, R. (2012). Kwestionariusz ryzyka stymulacyjnego i ryzyka instrumentalnego (KRSiRI) – nie tylko dla sportowców [Questionnaire of stimulating and instrumental risk (KRSiRI) – not only for athletes]. Psychological Journal, 18, 335–346.
O’Connor, P., O’Dea, A., & Melton, J. (2007). A methodology for identifying human error in US Navy diving accidents. Human Factors, 49, 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X312450
Oldenburg, M., & Jensen, H. J. (2019). Saliva cortisol level as a strain parameter for crews aboard merchant ships. Chronobiology International, 36, 1005–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2019.1604540
Orlandi, L., & Brooks, B. (2018). Measuring mental workload and physiological reactions in marine pilots: Building bridges towards redlines of performance. Applied Ergonomics, 69, 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.01.005
Overskeid, G. (1990). Opprinnelig kompetanse og utbytte av trening i skipssimulator. [Original competence and benefit of training with a ship simulator]. Nordisk Psykologi, 42, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291463.1990.10637003
Pastwa-Wojciechowska, B., Koralewska-Samko, J., & Lammek, M. (2021). Resilience and coping in difficult social situations among children from low socioeconomic families. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 9, 299–305. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.108286
Piotrowski, A., Boe, O., Rawat, S., & Deshpande, A. P. (2020). Organizational climate, organizational support and citizenship behavior in the army. Scientific Journal of the Military University of Land Forces, 52, 698–713. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.3964
Priyaadarshini, R., & Lalatendu, J. (2024). Does self and role efficacy navigate effectiveness among MSME managers? A process-based perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 18, 984–1003. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-10-2023-0427
Reason, J. (2017). The human contribution: Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315239125
Renganayagalu, S. K., Mallam, S. C., Nazir, S., Ernstsen, J., & Haavardtun, P. (2019). Impact of simulation fidelity on student self-efficacy and perceived skill development in maritime training. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation & Safe ty of Sea Transportation, 13, 663–669. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.13.03.25
Saus, E., Johnsen, B. H., Eid, J., & Thayer, J. F. (2012). Who benefits from simulator training: Personality and heart rate variability in relation to situation awareness during navigation training. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1262–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.009
Schultheiss, A. J., Koekemoer, E., & Masenge, A. (2023). Career commitment and subjective career success: Considering the role of career resilience and self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Career Development, 32, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162231172560
Skuzińska, A., Plopa, M., & Plopa, W. (2020). Bullying at work and mental health: The moderating role of demographic and occupational variables. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 16, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0280-9
Vong, F. (2007). The psychology of risk-taking in gambling among Chinese visitors to Macau. International Gambling Studies, 7, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459790601157731
Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.414
Wijk, C., & Water, A. (2000). Personality characteristics of South African Navy submarine personnel. Military Medicine, 165, 656–658. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/165.9.656
Wongsuwan, N., & Na-Nan, K. (2022). Mediating effects of self-efficacy, resilience and job satisfaction on the relationship between person-organisation fit and employee work adjustment. Sustainability, 14, 11787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811787
Wulvik, A. S., Dybvik, H., & Steinert, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between mental state (workload and affect) and physiology in a control room setting (ship bridge simulator). Cognition, Technology & Work, 22, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00553-8
Zaleśkiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality, 15, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.426
Zaleśkiewicz, T., & Piskorz, Z. (2004). Is investing as risky as bungee jumping? The sensitivity of risk perception by instrumental and stimulating risk takers. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 165–172.
Zaleśkiewicz, T., & Piskorz, Z. (2007). Risk as necessity and risk as pleasure: The perception of instrumental and stimulating risks. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 38, 206–216.
