Teaching doctoral students: Best practices for modern education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.04

Keywords:

Masters of Didactics (MoD), Best practices in didactics, Higher Education Teaching Methods, Doctoral School, interdisciplinarity

Abstract

This article presents a piloting of a comprehensive proposal for teach-ing the course Didactics of Higher Education, specifically designed and conducted at the Doctoral School at the University of Silesia. The course integrates best practices acquired by the authors during the project Masters of Didactics (MoD) and its advanced track – the Mas-ters of Didactics – Advanced Teaching Qualifications. The practices have been successfully adapted from renowned institutions, including Aarhus University (Denmark), Ghent University (Belgium) and Univer-sity College London (Great Britain). The proposal emphasizes the in-novative combination of pedagogical methods (i.e., team-based learn-ing (TBL), assessment and feedback and gamification), aiming to equip future educators with the skills necessary to excel in modern academic environments. By fostering a deep understanding of effective teaching methods, the course’s objective is to prepare doctoral students to be-come leaders in higher education attentive to diverse students’ needs, capable of enhancing learning outcomes and contributing to the ad-vancement of educational standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brew, Angela (1999). “Towards autonomous assessment: Using self-assessment and peer assessment”. In: Sally Brown, Angela Glasner (eds.). Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 159–171.

Brown, Gawin T. L. (2022). “The past, present and future of educa-tional assessment: A transdisciplinary perspective”. Frontiers in Ed-ucation 7: 1060633. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633.

Chiu, Ya-Ling, Li Xu, Yuan-Teng Hsu, Jying-Nan Wang (2024). “Soft skills unveiled: A comprehensive exploration of employer prefer-ences and employability essentials”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education June, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2024.23511 98.

Chodisetty, Vamsi, Amish Jain, Landry Cowles, Nate Cowan, Marisa Imbroane, Hejin Jeong, Sarah Fry, Amy L. Wilson-Delfosse (2024).

“Is the lecture dead? Medical students’ perspectives on reconciling live lectures and 21st-century learning.” New Directions for Teach-ing and Learning, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/tl.20593.

Cooke, Belinda, Mariana Kaiseler, Ben Robertson, Hugo Smith, Sarah Swann, Thalita Vergilio, Susan V. Smith (2024). “Pedagogical inter-ventions to support student belonging and employability: Four case studies”. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education 30: 1–34.

Evaristo, Jerónimo Sanchos Mendes, Paula Catarino, Ana Paula Aires, Helena Campos (2020). “A didactic proposal for teaching sequences in the 2nd cycle of secondary education on in Angola”. In: Luis Gómez Chova, Antonio López Martínez, Candel I. Torres (eds.). INTED2020 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED, 3809–3819.

Fränkel, Silvia, Sterken, Moritz, Stinken-Rösner, L. (2023). “From bar-riers to boosters: Initial teacher education for inclusive science ed-ucation.” Frontiers in Education 8: 1191619.

Gejdoš, Miroslav (2019). “Modern trends in education”. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences IJONESS 10/2: 223–233.

Gibbs, Graham (2006). “How assessment frames student learning”. In: Cordelia Bryan, Karen Clegg (eds.) Innovative assessment in higher education. New York: Routledge, 23–37.

Hattie, John (1999). “Influences on student learning”. Inaugural Lec-ture: Professor of Education, University of Auckland.

Hattie, John (2012). Visible Learning. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324 /9780203887332.

Hattie, John, Helen Timperley (2007). “The power of feedback”. Review of Educational Research 77/1: 81–112. doi: 10.3102/00346543029 8487 .

Hristov, Slavča, Dimitar Nakov, Jelena Miočinović (2023). “Construc-tive alignment between objectives, teaching and learning activities, student competencies and assessment methods in higher educa-tion”. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences 21/2: 21–36.

Kozłowska Izabela (2016). „Gamifikacja – specyfika wykorzystania na-rzędzia w Polsce”. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwer-sytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 255: 37–45 .

Le, Siyu, (2023). “Team-based learning in online education: the devel-opment of students’ creative thinking skills in digital art”. Educa-tion and Information Technologies 28/11: 14967–14986.

Lee, Kuo-Wei (2023). “Effectiveness of gamification and selection of ap-propriate teaching methods of creativity: Students’ perspectives”. Heliyon 9: e20420.

McGonigal, Jane (2011). Reality Is Broken. Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York: The Penguin Press.

Nadi-Ravandi, Somayyeh, Zahra Batooli (2022). “Gamification in edu-cation: A scientometric, content and co-occurrence analysis of sys-tematic review and meta-analysis articles”. Education and Infor-mation Technologies 27: 10207–10238.

NSW Education Standards Authority. (2024). “Assessment For, As and of Learning”. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/por tal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-curriculum/assessment/appro aches. Accessed 30.05.2024.

O'Farrell, James, Carla Weaver (2024). “Technology and Transfor-mation: Redefining Higher Education for Generations Z and Alpha”. [Preprint.] May 23, 2024 [accessed 2024 June 28]. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4833043 or http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.4833043.

Oliveira, Wilk, Juho Hamari, Lei Shi, Armando M. Toda, Luiz Ro-drigues, Paula T. Palomino, Seiji Isotani (2023). “Tailored gamifica-tion in education: A literature review and future agenda”. Education and Information Technologies 28: 373–406.

Shute, Valerie J. (2008). “Focus on formative feedback”. Review of Ed-ucational Research 78/1: 153–189.

Smiderle, Rodrigo, Sandro J. Rigo, Leonardo B. Marques, Jorge A. Coe-lho Peçanha de Miranda, Patricia A. Jaques (2020). “The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits”. Smart Learning Environment 7: 3.

Sweet, Michael, Larry K. Michaelsen (eds.) (2023). Team-based learn-ing in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. New York: Taylor & Fran-cis, 1–330.

Wobbe, Kristin K., Elisabeth A. Stoddard (eds.) (2023). Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. New York: Tay-lor & Francis, 1–175.

Yidana, Peter, Sarah Darkwa (2024). “A model of effective teaching of economics in higher education: The integral role of classroom learn-ing environment, instructional practices, and teacher characteris-tics”. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education 30: 1–30.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Holewik, K., Nowak, B., & Przybyła-Kasperek, M. (2024). Teaching doctoral students: Best practices for modern education. Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, (21/2), 79–109. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.04

Issue

Section

Articles