Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweKształcenie doktorantów: najlepsze praktyki nowoczesnej edukacji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2024.2.04Słowa kluczowe:
Mistrzowie Dydaktyki, najlepsze praktyki, dydaktyka szkoły wyższej, Szkoła Doktorska, interdyscyplinarnośćAbstrakt
Niniejszy artykuł przedstawia pilotaż modelu nauczania przedmiotu Dydaktyka szkoły wyższej, zaprojektowany dla i zrealizowany w Szkole Doktorskiej na Uniwersytecie Śląskim. Kurs jest próbą integracji naj-lepszych praktyk zdobytych przez autorów podczas uczestnictwa w projekcie Mistrzowie Dydaktyki (Masters of Didactics) i w jego zaawansowanej ścieżce – Mistrzowie Dydaktyki – program zaawansowany (Masters of Didactics in Excellent Teaching). Praktyki te zostały z po-wodzeniem zaadaptowane z renomowanych ośrodków akademickich, takich jak Aarhus University (Dania), Ghent University (Belgia) i University College London (Wielka Brytania). Model kładzie nacisk na innowacyjne metodologie pedagogiczne (tj. nauczanie zespołowe, ocenianie i informację zwrotną oraz grywalizację), mając na celu wyposażenie przyszłych nauczycieli w umiejętności niezbędne do doskonalenia się w nowoczesnych środowiskach akademickich. Poprzez wspieranie dogłębnego zrozumienia skutecznych metodologii nauczania, celem kursu jest przygotowanie doktorantów do roli liderów w szkolnictwie wyższym, zdolnych do poprawy wyników nauczania i przyczynienia się do rozwoju standardów edukacyjnych.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Brew, Angela (1999). “Towards autonomous assessment: Using self-assessment and peer assessment”. In: Sally Brown, Angela Glasner (eds.). Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press, 159–171.
Brown, Gawin T. L. (2022). “The past, present and future of educa-tional assessment: A transdisciplinary perspective”. Frontiers in Ed-ucation 7: 1060633. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1060633.
Chiu, Ya-Ling, Li Xu, Yuan-Teng Hsu, Jying-Nan Wang (2024). “Soft skills unveiled: A comprehensive exploration of employer prefer-ences and employability essentials”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education June, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2024.23511 98.
Chodisetty, Vamsi, Amish Jain, Landry Cowles, Nate Cowan, Marisa Imbroane, Hejin Jeong, Sarah Fry, Amy L. Wilson-Delfosse (2024).
“Is the lecture dead? Medical students’ perspectives on reconciling live lectures and 21st-century learning.” New Directions for Teach-ing and Learning, 1–12. doi: 10.1002/tl.20593.
Cooke, Belinda, Mariana Kaiseler, Ben Robertson, Hugo Smith, Sarah Swann, Thalita Vergilio, Susan V. Smith (2024). “Pedagogical inter-ventions to support student belonging and employability: Four case studies”. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education 30: 1–34.
Evaristo, Jerónimo Sanchos Mendes, Paula Catarino, Ana Paula Aires, Helena Campos (2020). “A didactic proposal for teaching sequences in the 2nd cycle of secondary education on in Angola”. In: Luis Gómez Chova, Antonio López Martínez, Candel I. Torres (eds.). INTED2020 Proceedings. Valencia: IATED, 3809–3819.
Fränkel, Silvia, Sterken, Moritz, Stinken-Rösner, L. (2023). “From bar-riers to boosters: Initial teacher education for inclusive science ed-ucation.” Frontiers in Education 8: 1191619.
Gejdoš, Miroslav (2019). “Modern trends in education”. International Journal of New Economics and Social Sciences IJONESS 10/2: 223–233.
Gibbs, Graham (2006). “How assessment frames student learning”. In: Cordelia Bryan, Karen Clegg (eds.) Innovative assessment in higher education. New York: Routledge, 23–37.
Hattie, John (1999). “Influences on student learning”. Inaugural Lec-ture: Professor of Education, University of Auckland.
Hattie, John (2012). Visible Learning. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324 /9780203887332.
Hattie, John, Helen Timperley (2007). “The power of feedback”. Review of Educational Research 77/1: 81–112. doi: 10.3102/00346543029 8487 .
Hristov, Slavča, Dimitar Nakov, Jelena Miočinović (2023). “Construc-tive alignment between objectives, teaching and learning activities, student competencies and assessment methods in higher educa-tion”. Journal of Agriculture and Plant Sciences 21/2: 21–36.
Kozłowska Izabela (2016). „Gamifikacja – specyfika wykorzystania na-rzędzia w Polsce”. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwer-sytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach 255: 37–45 .
Le, Siyu, (2023). “Team-based learning in online education: the devel-opment of students’ creative thinking skills in digital art”. Educa-tion and Information Technologies 28/11: 14967–14986.
Lee, Kuo-Wei (2023). “Effectiveness of gamification and selection of ap-propriate teaching methods of creativity: Students’ perspectives”. Heliyon 9: e20420.
McGonigal, Jane (2011). Reality Is Broken. Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. New York: The Penguin Press.
Nadi-Ravandi, Somayyeh, Zahra Batooli (2022). “Gamification in edu-cation: A scientometric, content and co-occurrence analysis of sys-tematic review and meta-analysis articles”. Education and Infor-mation Technologies 27: 10207–10238.
NSW Education Standards Authority. (2024). “Assessment For, As and of Learning”. https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/por tal/nesa/k-10/understanding-the-curriculum/assessment/appro aches. Accessed 30.05.2024.
O'Farrell, James, Carla Weaver (2024). “Technology and Transfor-mation: Redefining Higher Education for Generations Z and Alpha”. [Preprint.] May 23, 2024 [accessed 2024 June 28]. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4833043 or http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.4833043.
Oliveira, Wilk, Juho Hamari, Lei Shi, Armando M. Toda, Luiz Ro-drigues, Paula T. Palomino, Seiji Isotani (2023). “Tailored gamifica-tion in education: A literature review and future agenda”. Education and Information Technologies 28: 373–406.
Shute, Valerie J. (2008). “Focus on formative feedback”. Review of Ed-ucational Research 78/1: 153–189.
Smiderle, Rodrigo, Sandro J. Rigo, Leonardo B. Marques, Jorge A. Coe-lho Peçanha de Miranda, Patricia A. Jaques (2020). “The impact of gamification on students’ learning, engagement and behavior based on their personality traits”. Smart Learning Environment 7: 3.
Sweet, Michael, Larry K. Michaelsen (eds.) (2023). Team-based learn-ing in the social sciences and humanities: Group work that works to generate critical thinking and engagement. New York: Taylor & Fran-cis, 1–330.
Wobbe, Kristin K., Elisabeth A. Stoddard (eds.) (2023). Project-Based Learning in the First Year: Beyond All Expectations. New York: Tay-lor & Francis, 1–175.
Yidana, Peter, Sarah Darkwa (2024). “A model of effective teaching of economics in higher education: The integral role of classroom learn-ing environment, instructional practices, and teacher characteris-tics”. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education 30: 1–30.
