Brexit, wzrost populizmu w Wielkiej Brytanii i sytuacja w Wietnamie

Autor

  • Ho Thu Thao University of Social Sciences and Humanities; Vietnam National University

Słowa kluczowe:

populizm, poziomy analizy, globalizacja, partia polityczna, media, populista, Wielka Brytania, Brexit, Wietnam

Abstrakt

Populizm jest zjawiskiem skomplikowanym, ponieważ koncepcja ta nie tylko różni się zarówno w podejściu, jak i przejawach, ale także ukształtowała się w krajach i regionach poza Europą. Podczas gdy intelektualiści nieustannie krytykują i postrzegają to zjawisko jako zagrożenie, któremu należy zapobiegać, miliony ludzi w całej Europie jednocześnie okazują poparcie dla ruchów, partii i osób o ideologii populistycznej. Ten sprzeczny obraz pokazuje, że pojawienie się populizmu jest w istocie odzwierciedleniem szeregu niestabilnych i niepokojących problemów społeczno-politycznych, a także skrajnych emocji i bezsilności ludzi w takich sytuacjach. Celem artykułu jest zatem przyjrzenie się czynnikom napędzającym Brexit, a tym samym zbadanie populizmu na poziomie analizy na poziomie indywidualnym, grupowym, państwowym i systemowym. Wyjaśniając poglądy wietnamskich intelektualistów na temat populizmu, artykuł następnie omawia możliwość wzrostu populizmu w obecnej sytuacji społeczno-politycznej w Wietnamie.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Albinger L. K. (2020), “Constructivism’s Relevance to Understanding Brexit”, E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2020/06/08/constructivisms-relevanceto-understanding-brexit/.

Berry M. (2016), “Understanding the role of the mass media in the EU Referendum – EU Referendum Analysis 2016”, EU Referendum Analysis, https://www.referendumanalysis.eu/understanding-the-role-of-the-mass-media-in-the-eu-referendum-eu-referendum-analysis-2016/.

Boros T. et al. (2018), “State of Populism in Europe 2018”, Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Policy Solutions, https://progressivepost.eu/wp-content/uploads/WEB_State-of-Populism-in-Europe-2018.pdf.

Boros T. et al. (2020), “State of Populism in Europe 2020”, Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Policy Solutions, https://progressivepost.eu/wp-content/uploads/State-of-Populism-in-Europe-2020.pdf.

Bounds A. (2019), “What the UK’s ‘left-behind’ areas want after Brexit”, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/89bff8c8-95dd-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36.

Bryant O., Moffit B. (2019), “What actually is populism? And why does it have a bad reputation?”, The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/what-actually-ispopulism-and-why-does-it-have-a-bad-reputation-109874.

Calléja L. (2020), “The Rise of Populism: a Threat to Civil Society?”, E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2020/02/09/the-rise-of-populism-a-threat-to-civil-society/.

Carrell S. (2016), “Scotland to campaign officially to remain in the EU”, the Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/mar/03/pro-eu-vote-would-harmscottish-independence-ex-snp-deputy-jim-sillars.

Clarke H. D., Goodwin M., Whiteley P. (2017), “Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote”, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 70, Issue 3, tr.439-464 https://academic.oup.com/pa/article/70/3/439/3109029.

Corbyn J. (2018), “Let’s build a real social Europe for the many, not the few” – Corbyn’s speech to the Party of European Socialists”, Labour List, https://labourlist.org/2018/12/lets-build-a-real-social-europe-for-the-many-not-the-fewcorbyns-speech-to-the-party-of-european-socialists/.

di Piramo D. (2009), “‘Speak For Me!’: How Populist Leaders Defy Democracy In Latin America”, Global Change, Peace and Security, Taylor & Francis, https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/28419/56041_1.pdf%3Bsequence=1.

Đỗ Đức Minh, Cù Văn Trung (2020), “Chủ nghĩa dân túy và phòng, chống những biểu hiện của chủ nghĩa dân túy ở Việt Nam hiện nay”, Tạp chí Lý luận Chính trị, Số 1-2020, http://lyluanchinhtri.vn/home/index.php/quoc-te/item/3094-chunghia-dan-tuy-va-phong-chong-nhung-bieu-hien-cua-chu-nghia-dan-tuy-oviet-nam-hien-nay.html.

Eroglu A.H., Kaleli S. (2016), “The impact of the images of the political leader on party image and voter preferences during the process of political marketing – Istanbul province sample”, International refereed academic social sciences journal, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290175363_THE_IMPACT_OF_THE_IMAGES_OF_THE_POLITICAL_LEADER_ON_PARTY_IMAGE_AND_VOTER_PREFERENCES_DURING_THE_PROCESS_OF_POLITICAL_MARKETING-_ISTANBUL_PROVINCE_SAMPLE.

Fleming I. (2018), “Demagogue Populism and the Future of the International System”, The Geopolitics, https://thegeopolitics.com/demagogue-populism-and-thefuture-of-the-international-system/.

Fukuyama F. (2019), “Contemporary populism”, Centre for Development and Enterprise, https://media.africaportal.org/documents/Contemporary-Populism-final.pdf.

Gebhard C. (2018), “Student Feature – Levels of Analysis”, E-International Relations, https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/25/student-feature-levels-of-analysis/.

Lê Minh Quân (2019), “Về chủ nghĩa dân túy và đấu tranh ngăn ngừa những biểu hiện của nó ở Việt Nam hiện nay”, Tạp chí Cộng sản, Số 920 (6-2019), bản mềm toàn văn tại: http://tuyengiao.vn/nghien-cuu/ly-luan/ve-chu-nghia-dan-tuy-vadau-tranh-ngan-ngua-nhung-bieu-hien-cua-no-o-viet-nam-hien-nay-122295.

Lewis P., et al. (2019), “Theresa May’s rhetoric can be as populist as Trump’s”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/06/theresa-may-britishprime-minister-populism-rhetoric-is-as-rife-as-in-donald-trump-speeches.

Muddle C. (2004), “The Populist Zeitgeist”, Government and Opposition, Vol. 39, No. 4, tr.541-563 https://ams.hi.is/wp-content/uploads/old/Jungar%20-%20&e%20Populist%20Zeitgeist.pdf.

Nguyễn Nhâm (2020), “Xu thế của chủ nghĩa dân túy ở châu Âu và bài học cho Việt Nam”, Kỷ yếu Hội thảo “Xu thế dân túy ở châu Âu: Một số vấn đề, dự báo và tác động”, Viện Nghiên cứu châu Âu, Hà Nội, tr.236-252

Parker C. D. (2016), “The UK Independence Party was central to the Brexit vote”, Vox, https://www.vox.com/mischiefs-of-faction/2016/7/1/12060504/ukip-brexitvote.

Richards S. (2016), “Take back control – the slogan the left should make its own”, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/19/take-backcontrol-slogan-left-power-right-state-intervention.

Schweiger C. (2007), “The Reluctant European: Britain and European Integration Since 1945”, in: Britain, Germany and the Future of the European Union. New Perspectives in German Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 14-42.

Smith P. (2019), “How Boris Johnson used Brexit populism to storm to victory in U.K. election”, NBC News, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/how-borisjohnson-used-brexit-populism-storm-victory-u-k-n1101401.

Stone J. (2016), “Liberal Democrats pledge to keep Britain in the EU after next election”, Independent, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eureferendum-result-lib-dems-remain-liberal-democrats-live-policy-stay-leave-a 7103186.html.

Thái Doãn Tước, Thái Doãn Hùng (2021), “Cảnh giác với những biểu hiện của chủ nghĩa dân túy trước thềm Đại hội đại biểu toàn quốc lần thứ XIII của Đảng”, Tạp chí Quốc phòng toàn dân, http://tapchiqptd.vn/vi/phong-chong-dbhb-tu-dien-bien-tu-chuyen-hoa/canh-giac-voi-nhung-bieu-hien-cua-chu-nghia-dan-tuytruoc-them-dai-hoi-dai-bieu-toan-quoc-/16571.html.

Võ Văn Thưởng (2018), “Chủ nghĩa dân túy và những cảnh báo đối với Việt Nam”, Nhân Dân, https://nhandan.com.vn/tin-tuc-su-kien/chu-nghia-dan-tuy-vanhung-canh-bao-doi-voi-viet-nam-324216/.

Opublikowane

2021-12-14

Jak cytować

Thao, H. T. (2021). Brexit, wzrost populizmu w Wielkiej Brytanii i sytuacja w Wietnamie. Cywilizacja I Polityka, (19), 22–37. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/cywilizacja/article/view/9287

Numer

Dział

Artykuły