Academic Scientific JournalsISSN 1732-5641
ICV 2023: 74.25
MEiN score: 20
Open Access Policy
The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Reviewing procedure
Scientific articles are subjected to the review procedure, in which at least two independent reviewers participate, from outside the scientific unit affiliated by the author / authors of the article. Initial acceptance of the article takes about 2 weeks, the review process up to 4 months, and a total of up to 6 months for publication.
The review procedure is carried out in accordance with the double-blind review process, which means that the author / authors of the scientific article and reviewers do not know their identities.
In special cases, the reviewer is required to sign a declaration on the lack of conflict of interest - a statement that there are no direct personal relationships, i.e. kinship, marriages or professional relationships or scientific cooperation in the last two years before the review.
The review procedure ends with the review being prepared by the reviewer, which contains the explicit conclusion of the reviewer about the conditions for admitting the scientific article for publication or rejecting it. The names of the reviewers of individual publications will not be disclosed.
Criteria for qualifying articles
The editors of the journal accept only original articles of a scientific nature in Polish and English. Articles that do not meet this requirement will be rejected by the editors before sending the article for review.
Articles that infringe the copyrights of third parties will not be accepted by the editors and will be rejected before sending the article for review.
When admitting a scientific article for publication, the following criteria will be taken into account:
1. Compatibility and correctness of conclusions with the presented discussion in the article
2. Compatibility of the title and abstracts with the subject of the article.
3. Correctness of research methods used by the author / authors.
4. Correctness of footnotes and timeliness of the state of knowledge presented in the article.
5. The correctness of the layout of the article, the language, style and terminology used.
6. Linguistic correctness in the summary in English.
7. Correctness of attached drawings and tables.
