Migration-caused qualitative changes in human potential of the states in the territorial migration labour market “Ukraine – Poland – Germany”


  • Tetiana Stepura Lviv Polytechnic National University
  • Tetyana Nagornyak Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University
  • Vasyl Lypchuk Stepan Gzhytskyi National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
  • Uliana Sadova Lviv Polytechnic National University


State Policy of Donor-Cuntries and Recipient-Countries, Labor Migration, erritorial Migration Labor Market (TMLM), Qualitative Changes in Human Potential, Ukraine, Germany, Poland, Asynchrony (Nonlinearity) of the World Order, Reconstruction of Ukraine After the Victory


The paper deals with political and economic dimension of the quality changes in human’s potential within territorial migration labour market (TMLM) – a stable polycentric system of labour’s force turnover, which geographically combines the territories of two countries (Ukraine and Germany) with the potential impact of cross-border one (Poland). In circumstances of Ukraine’s war with Russia, Ukrainians are primarily focused on these countries while looking for temporary asylum, obtaining a European educational document, getting employed, emigration.

The method of principal components is used for finding out the system-forming factors of the territorial migration labour market. This makes it possible to identify the relevant prerequisites for qualitative changes in human potential at the levels of the individual, households and macro-level. Depending on the depth of asymmetry in the development of the territorial migration labour market of participating countries and the nature of the migration policy, the donor country, especially at the macro-level, will irreversibly suffer from qualitative losses. Preventing them and mitigating these effects is the task of donor country policy. Instead, solving the problem of the qualitative losses of immigrants and their families becomes more a task for the host country. An important and indispensable tool in this task is entrepreneurship, especially social one.

In addition, the state program of Ukraine’s reconstruction after the Victory should take into consideration the vector of return of its citizens and strengthening of its human capital. This should happen not only due to the patriotism of Ukrainians, but also through the implementation of the system of concrete measures to support small and medium businesses, quality educational trajectories, flexible governance practices, restoring trust among people and ensuring security of life and self-development.


Download data is not yet available.


Akcigit, U., Baslandze, S. & Stantcheva, S. (2016). Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors. American Economic Review 106 (10), 2930-81. doi: 10.1257/aer.20150237.

Baranyak, I. Ye. (2016). Українсько-німецька територіальна міграційна система: сучасний стан і тенденції розвитку [Ukraine-Germany territorial migration system: current state and development trends]. Регіональна економіка 4(82), 66-74.

Birkhölzer, K. (2015). Social Enterprise in Germany: A Typology of Models. ICSEM Working Papers 15, Liege: The International Comparative Social Enterprise Models (ICSEM) Project.

BMF (Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge). (2019). Asyl, Migration und Integration. Das Bundesamt in Zahlen 2018. www.bamf.de. Retrieved November 15, 2019, from: https://www. bamf.de/DE/ Startseite/startseite_node.html.

Brzozowski, J. (2006). Rola migracji międzynarodowych w niwelowaniu nierówności społecznych. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy 8, 471-481.

Bezugliy P. Migration As A Result Of Socio-Economic State Policy. Evropský politický a právní diskurz. 2019. Svazek 6. 5 vydání. S. 89–101.

Bezuglyi P., Nagornyak, T., Pachos Iu. (2020). Migration Processes In Modern Ukrainian-Polish Discourse. European Journal of Transformation Studies. 2020, vol. 8, no. 1-2, 33-48.

Cieślińska, B. (2012). Emigracje bliskie i dalekie. Studium współczesnych emigracji zarobkowych na przykładzie województwa podlaskiegoc. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.

de Haas, H. (2010). Migration and Development: A Theoretical Perspective. Bielefeld: Centre for Interdisciplinary Research.

de Haas, H. (2014). Migration theory: Quo vadis? Working Papers IMI. Paper 100. Oxford: International Migration Institute, University of Oxford.

de Haas, H., Czaika, M., Flahaux, M.-L., Mahendra, E, Natter, K., Vezzoli, S., & Villares-Varela, M. (2018). International Migration Trends, Determinants and Policy Effects. Working Papers IMI. Paper 142. Oxford: International Migration Institute, University of Oxford.

EC (European Commission). (2008). Supporting Entrepreneurial Diversity in Europe – Ethnic Minority Entrepreneurship. Migrant Entrepreneurship. Conclusions and Recommendations of the European Commission’s Network «Ethnic Minority Businesses». Brussels.

EC (European Commission). (2014). A map of Social Enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Country Report for Germany. Brussels: European Commission.

EC (European Commission). (2016). Integration Action Plan of Third-Country Nationals. European Commission.

EC (European Commission). (2020). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Comparative synthesis report. Executive summary. Authors: Borzaga, C., Galera, G., Franchini, B., Chiomento, S., Nogales, R., & Carini, C. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved March 23, 2020, from: https://europa.eu/!Qq64ny.

EESC (European Economic and Social Committee). (2018). Social economy enterprises as a driver for migrant integration (own-initiative opinion).

European Economic and Social Committee. Eurostat. Population and self-employment by sex, age, country of birth and labour status. Retrieved March 20, 2020 from: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do? dataset=lfsa_esgacob&lang=en.

Graf, J. (2019). Wanderungsmonitoring: Bildungs- und Erwerbsmigration nach Deutschland. Jahresbericht 2018. Berichtsreihen zu Migration und Integration, Reihe 1. Nürnberg: Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl des Bundesamtes für Migration und Flüchtlinge.

Granovetter, S. M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360-1380.

GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). (2018). Cudzoziemcy na krajowym rynku pracy w ujęciu regionalnym. Raport końcowy. Warszawa. www.stat.gov.pl. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from: https://stat.gov.pl/statystyki-eksperymentalne/kapital-ludzki/cudzoziemcy-na-krajowym-rynku-pracy-w-ujeciu-regionalnym,6,1.html.

GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). (2019). Główne kierunki emigracji i imigracji na pobyt stały w latach 1966-2018. Warszawa. www.stat.gov.pl. Retrieved March 20, 2020, from: https:// stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/ludnosc/migracje-zagraniczne-ludnosci/glowne-kierunkiemigracji-i-imigracji-na-pobyt-staly-w-latach-1966-2018,4,2.html.

Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (2003). What Fundamentals Drive World Migration? Discussion Paper. World Institute for Development Economics Research; United Nations University.

Hatton, T. J., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic Impact. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hicks, J. (1932). The Theory of Wages. London: Macmillan. IDSS (Institute for Demography and Social Studies of M.V. Ptukha). (2018). Українське суспільство: міграційний вимір. Національна доповідь [Ukrainian society: a migration dimension. National report]. Kyiv.

ILO (International Labour Organization). (2018). Global Estimates on International Migrant Workers – Results and Methodology. 2nd edition. Geneva: ILO.

IOM (International Organization for Migration). (2016a). Migration AS AN enabler of development in Ukraine. Kyiv: International Organization for Migration. Mission in Ukraine.

IOM (International Organization for Migration). (2016b). Міграція в Україні: цифри і факти [Migration in Ukraine: Numbers and Facts]. Kyiv: International Organization for Migration. Mission in Ukraine.

Janecek, D. (2018). How Germany’s politicians can grow social enterprise. Bundestag. German government. 4 October 4. Knězáčková, R., Volejníková, J. (2015). Migration Between Regions in the Czech Republic.

Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice 23(1), 55-65.

Kosała, M. (2016). Przedsiębiorczość imigrantów w państwach UE i krajach OECD. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja 12, 326–340.

Lypchuk, V. (2017). Wpływ Procesów Migracyjnych na Ukrainie na Kształtowanie Rynku Pracy Polski Wschodniej. Studia i Materiały “Miscellanea Oeconomicae” 2, 347-358.

Massey, D. (1990). Social Structure, Household Strategies, and the Cumulative Causation of Migration. Population Index. Spring, 56(1), 3-26.

Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1998). Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. London: Clarendon Press.

MRPPS (Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej). (2019). Statystyka dotycząca zatrudniania cudzoziemców. Warszawa. www.psz.praca.gov.pl. Retrieved March 17, 2020, from: https://psz.praca.gov.pl/rynek-pracy/statystyki-i-analizy/zatrudnianie-cudzoziemcow-w-polsce.

Nagornyak, T. (2017). The war as a factorof migrationprocesses in Ukraine during 2014— 2016 Emigration Museum in Gdynia http://r.donnu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/2259.

Nagornyak, T. (2018). Ukrainian-Polish Vector of Migration Processes. Polski Przegląd Migracyjny THE POLISH MIGRATION REVIEW http://r.donnu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/2001/1/ The_Polish_Migration_Review_1_2018_3.pdf.

NCFM (National Coalition Fair Munich). (2018). Nationwide exchange of experience to support migrant entrepreneurs. March 13th, 2018. Münchner Künstlerhaus.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2019). International Migration Outlook 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Okolski, M. (2001). Incomplete Migration: a New Form of Mobility in Central and Eastern Europe. The Case of Polish and Ukrainian Migrants. In Patterns of Migration in Central Europe, edited by C. Wallace, D. Stola, 105-128. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Portes, A., & Bach, R. (1985). Latin Journey. Cuban and Mexican Immigrants in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The Laws of Migration. The Journal of the Statistical Society of London 48(2), 167-235.

Lants, B. (2002). Rozszerzenie ekonomii społecznej. Dokument przygotowawczy na I Europejską Konferencję Ekonomii Społecznej w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, CECOP, Praga, Oktober 24-25.

Sadova, U. Ya., Kniaziev, S. I., & Andrusyshyn, N. I. (2013). Територіальна міграційна система України як чинник розвитку економіки, держави і суспільства [The Territorial Migration System of Ukraine as a Factor in the Development of the Economy, State and Society]. Соціально-економічні проблеми сучасного періоду України 3, 3-12.

Sadova U., Stepura, T, Baranyak, I. (2020). Ukraine in the Territorial Migration Systems: Current Structural-Qualimetric Aspects of the Formation and Development. European Journal of Transformation Studies 8(1), 60-78.

SB (Statistisches Bundesamt). Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Ausländische Bevölkerung. Ergebnisse des Ausländerzentralregisters. www.destatis.de. Retrieved March 13, 2020, from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Migration-Integration/_inhalt.html.

SB (Statistisches Bundesamt). Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus. www.destatis.de. Retrieved March 13, 2020, from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Migration-Integration/_inhalt.html.

Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum, Sen. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 30-53.

Sjaastad, A. L. (1962). The Costs and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy 70(5), Part 2: Investment in Human Beings (Oct., 1962), 80-93.

Skeldon, R. (1997). Migration and development: A global perspective. Essex: Longman.

SSSU (State Statistics Service of Ukraine). (2017). Зовнішня трудова міграція України 2017. Статистичний бюлетень за результатами модульного вибіркового обстеження [External labour migration of Ukraine. Statistical bulletin on the results of modular sample survey]. Kyiv. www.ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved March 15, 2020, from: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ druk/publicat/kat_u/publ11_u.htm.

Stark, O., & Bloom, D. (1985). The New Economics of Labor Migration. The American Economic Review 75(2), 173-178.

Stepura, T. M. (2019). Історичні та сучасні дискурси культурологічного аспекту української міграції у фокусі збереження якості людського потенціалу. [Historical and modern discourses of culturological aspect of Ukrainian migration in the focus of preserving human potential quality] Громадський активізм українських мігрантів Європи : згуртовані новими викликами. Lviv: Видавництво «Апріорі», 115-158.

UN DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2019a). International Migrant Stock 2019.

UN DESA. Population Division 2019. New York. UN DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (2019b). International migrant stock 2019: Country Profiles: Germany.

UN DESA. New York. Wachter, L. M. (1974). Primary and Secondary Labor Markets: A Critique of the Dual Approach. University of Pennsylvania.

WBG (World Bank Group). (2018). Moving for Prosperity Global Migration and Labor Markets. Policy Research Report. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1281-1.

Zelinsky, W. (1971). The Hypothesis of the Mobility Transition. Geographical Review 61(2), 219-249.




How to Cite

Stepura, T., Nagornyak, T., Lypchuk, V., & Sadova, U. (2022). Migration-caused qualitative changes in human potential of the states in the territorial migration labour market “Ukraine – Poland – Germany”. European Journal of Transformation Studies, 10(1), 112–137. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/journal-transformation/article/view/7328