Zombies and Aliens: Fantasy and Science-Fiction Simulations in Teaching Political Science, International Relations and Security Studies

Authors

  • Piotr Walewicz Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/prog.2024.14.07

Keywords:

political science education, simulations, role-playing, popular culture, student-centered learning

Abstract

The article explores the pedagogical potential of integrating fantasy and science fiction simulations into teaching political science, International Relations or security studies at the university level. Recognizing the influence of popular culture on contemporary students, the article advocates for leveraging the immersive experience of simulations based on unusual topics. Drawing inspiration from similar successful didactic endeavors, we introduce an outline for a pedagogical experiment and key takeaways from its preliminary tests on students from various courses. Theoretical and empirical foundations are provided to support the experiment’s methodology, emphasizing the use of imaginative scenarios to engage students and provide them with a set of important skills, as well as foster critical thinking and enhance creative problem-solving in an empowering educational experience. The article presents the structure of the experiment, conducted over three years with diverse student groups, yielding promising early results and positive feedback, but also touches on its challenges and limitations. It concludes that team-based role-playing simulations provide an accessible, low-tech yet innovative tool which could make its way into more curriculums.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Piotr Walewicz, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy

Is a researcher at the Faculty of Political Science and Administration at Kazimierz Wielki University in Bydgoszcz, Poland. His research interests include, among others, international relations theory, scientific discourse, ecolinguistics, the concept of world-ecology and international environmental policy.

References

Archer C.C., Miller M.K., 2011, Prioritizing Active Learning: An Exploration of Gateway Courses in Political Science, “PS: Political Science & Politics”, Vol. 44, Issue 2.

Armstrong J.S., 2001, Role Playing: A method to Forecast Decisions, in: J.S. Armstrong (ed.), Principles of Forecasting, New York.

Asal V., Blake E.L., 2006, Creating Simulations for Political Science Education, “Journal of Political Science Education”, Vol. 2, Issue 1.

Asal V., Kratoville J., 2013, Constructing International Relations Simulations: Examining the Pedagogy of IR Simulations Through a Constructivist Learning Theory Lens, “Journal of Political Science Education”, Vol. 9, Issue 2.

Barrera F., Venegas-Muggli J.I., Nuñez O., 2021, The impact of role-playing simulation activities on higher education students’ academic results, “Innovations in Education and Teaching International”, Vol. 58, No. 3.

Belloni R., 2008, Role-Playing International Intervention in Conflict Areas: Lessons from Bosnia for Northern Ireland Education, “International Studies Perspectives”, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Bolton G.E., 2002, Game theory’s role in role-playing, “International Journal of Forecasting”, Vol. 18, Issue 3.

Buchs A., Blanchard O., 2011, Exploring the Concept of Sustainable Development Through Role-Playing, “The Journal of Economic Education”, Vol. 42, Issue 4.

Chung T., 2013, Table-top role playing game and creativity, “Thinking Skills and Creativity”, Vol. 8.

Daniau S., 2016, The Transformative Potential of Role-Playing Games: From Play Skills to Human Skills, “Simulation & Gaming”, Vol. 47, Issue 4.

Day Ch., 1999, Researching Teaching Through Reflective Practice, in: J. Loughran (ed.), Researching Teaching: Methodologies and Practices for Understanding Pedagogy, London–Philadelphia.

Drezner D., 2022, Theories of International Politics and Zombies, Princeton – Oxford.

Gordon E., Haas J., Michelson B., 2017, Civic Creativity: Role-Playing Games in Deliberative Process, “International Journal of Communication”, Vol. 11.

Gordon S., Thomas I., 2018, ‘The learning sticks’: reflections on a case study of role-playing for sustainability, “Environmental Education Research”, Vol. 24, No. 2.

Hartlaub S.G., Lancaster F.A., 2008, Teacher Characteristics and Pedagogy in Political Science, “Journal of Political Science Education”, Vol. 4, Issue 4.

Henriksen T.D., 2010, Moving Educational Role-Play Beyond Entertainment, “Teoría de la Educación: Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información”, Vol. 11, № 3.

Horn L., Rubin O., Schouenborg L., 2017, Undead Pedagogy: How a Zombie Simulation Can Contribute to Teaching International Relations, “International Studies Perspectives”, Vol. 17, Issue 2.

Johnson E.K., Salter A., 2023, Playful Pedagogy in the Pandemic: Pivoting to Game-Based Learning, London–New York.

Jubas K., Taber N., Brown T., 2015, Introduction: Approaching Popular Culture as Pedagogy, in: Jubas K., Taber N., Brown T. (eds.), Popular Culture as Pedagogy: Research in the Field of Adult Education, Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei.

Kidron A.G., 1977, The Effectiveness of Experimental Methods in Training and Education: The Case of Role Playing, “The Academy of Management Review”, Vol. 2, No. 3.

Kotryová L., 2017, Project System: totalitarian utopia as a role-playing game, “World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development”, Vol. 14, No. 2/3.

Kramp M.M., 2004, Exploring Life and Experience Through Narrative Inquiry, in: deMarrais K., Lapan S.D. (eds.), Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences, Mahwah–London.

Lee G.H., Talib A.Z., Zainon W.M.N.W., Lim C.K., 2014, Learning History Using Role-Playing Game (RPG) on Mobile Platform, in: H. Jeong, M.S. Obaidat, N. Yen, J. Park (eds.), Advances in Computer Science and its Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 279, Berlin–Heidelberg.

McKernan J., 2007, Curriculum and Imagination: Process Theory, Pedagogy and Action Research, London–New York.

Parisi L., Allison J.E., DaLaet D., Penttinen E., Rytkønen H., Schemenauer E., Sharoni S., Smith H.A., 2013, Innovating International Relations Pedagogy: Critical Feminist Engagements, “International Feminist Journal of Politics”, Vol. 15, Issue 3.

Picariello D.K. (ed.), 2020, The Politics of Horror, Cham.

Shearer A.W., 2021, Roleplaying to Improve Resilience, “Architecture_MPS”, Vol. 18, Issue 1.

Simpson A.W., Kaussler B., 2009, IR Teaching Reloaded: Using Films and Simulations in the Teaching of International Relations, “International Studies Perspectives”, Vol. 10, Issue 4.

Simpson J.M., Elias V.L., 2011, Choices and Chances: The Sociology Role-playing Game—The Sociological Imagination in Practice, “Teaching Sociology”, Vol. 39, Issue 1.

Smith K., 2014, Critical Hits & Critical Spaces: Roleplaying Games and Their Potential in Developing Critical Literacy and New Literacy Practices, in: P. Paugh, T. Kress, R. Lake (eds.), Teaching towards Democracy with Postmodern and Popular Culture Texts, Rotterdam–Boston–Taipei.

Stump J.L., 2013, Exploring Politics and Government With Popular Culture: Justifications, Methods, Potentials, and Challenges in Introductory Political Science Courses, “Journal of Political Science Education”, Vol. 9, Issue 3.

Trowbridge D., Woodward J., 2021, Pedagogy training among political scientists: Opportunities, interest, and obstacles, “Journal of Political Science Education”, Vol. 17, Issue 1.

Weber C., 2001, The Highs and Lows of Teaching IR Theory: Using Popular Films for Theoretical Critique, “International Studies Perspectives”, Vol. 2, No. 3.

Wendt A., Duvall R., 2008, Sovereignty and the UFO, “Political Theory”, Vol. 36, Issue 4.

Wright J.C., Weissglass D.E., Casey V., 2020, Imaginative Role-Playing as a Medium for Moral Development: Dungeons & Dragons Provides Moral Training, “Journal of Humanistic Psychology”, Vol. 60, Issue 1.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Walewicz, P. (2024). Zombies and Aliens: Fantasy and Science-Fiction Simulations in Teaching Political Science, International Relations and Security Studies. Progress, (14), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.26881/prog.2024.14.07