Shakespearean Female Monarchs: Early Modern Empowerment or a Cautionary Tale? A Feminist Critique of Selected Plays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/prog.2025.17.02Keywords:
feminism, Shakespeare, gender studiesAbstract
The aim of this article is to analyse three Shakespearean female monarchs in terms of their nonconformity with the stringent societal gender expectation of the Early Modern period and to determine how the plays suggest that the characters’ behaviour should be assessed. As the main analysis focuses on royal women, this article provides a brief historical perspective on queenship during that era. The main part of the article is the feminist analysis of Gertrude, Lady Macbeth, and Cleopatra whose common denominator is their royal status and womanhood as well as their untraditional and nonconforming behaviour. The investigation delves into their relations with others, their importance to the plot, and the way they wield power and exert influence. What follows is an examination of how each of the characters dies and what it might symbolise in a broader social context. As in each case the death of an unruly female character marks the reemergence of a patriarchal order, the article arrives at the conclusion that the characters are punished for their subversive behaviour and what these plays do is perpetuate the masculine view of the world.
Downloads
References
Adelman J., 1992, “Born of a Woman”: Fantasies of Maternal Power in Macbeth, in: A. Sinfield (ed.), New Casebooks Macbeth, London.
Adelman J., 1992, Suffocating Mothers. Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, Hamlet to The Tempest, New York and London.
Alfar C., 2003, Fantasies of Female Evil. The Dynamics of Gender and Power in Shakespearean Tragedy, Newark.
Asp C., 1981, “Be Bloody, Bold and Resolute”: Tragic Action and Sexual Stereotyping in Macbeth, “Studies in Philology”, Vol. 78, No. 2.
Aughterson K. (ed.), 1995, Renaissance Women: A Source Book. Constructions of Femininity in England, London.
Bushnell R., 1992, Tyranny and Effeminacy in Early Modern England, in: M.A. Di Cesare (ed.), Reconsidering the Renaissance: Papers from the Twenty-first Annual Conference, Binghamton.
Cook C., 1996, The Fatal Cleopatra, in: S.N. Garner, M. Sprengnether (eds.), Shakespearean Tragedy and Gender, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
Darraj S., 2001, “The Sword Phillipan”: Female Power, Maternity and Genderbending in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra, “Schuylkill: A Creative and Critical Review from Temple University”, Vol. 4, No. 1.
Davies T., 1997, Humanism, London.
Encyclopaedia Britannica, n.d., Peace of Amboise, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Peace-of-Amboise [accessed: 3.12.2024].
Fletcher A., 1995, Gender, Sex and Subordination in England 1500–1800, New Haven and London.
Florio J., 1951, Florios Second Frutes to be Gathered of Twelve Trees, of Divers but Delightsome Tastes to the Tongues of Italians and Englishmen, London.
French M., 1992, Macbeth and Masculine Values, in: A. Sinfield (ed.), New Casebooks Macbeth, London.
Heilbrun C., 1957, The Character of Hamlet’s Mother, “Shakespeare Quarterly”, Vol. 8, No. 2.
Kantorowicz E., 1957, The King’s Two Bodies. A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology, Princeton.
Montgomery A., 2009, Enter QUEEN GERTRUDE Stage Center: Re-Viewing Gertrude as Full Participant and Active Interpreter in Hamlet, “South Atlantic Review”, Vol. 74, No. 3.
Randazzo G., 2012, Cleopatra: The Defiance of Feminine Virtue, English Senior Seminar Papers, St. John Fisher University, https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=english_seniorseminar [accessed: 21.12.2024].
Shakespeare W., 1995, Antony and Cleopatra by J. Wilders, London.
Shakespeare W., 2003, Hamlet Prince of Denmark by P. Edwards, Cambridge.
Shakespeare W., 2015, Macbeth by K. Muir, London.
Academic Scientific Journals

