Conceptual metaphors in the naming convention of the United States Armed Forces

Authors

  • Karol Plichta University of Gdansk

Keywords:

conceptual metaphor, proper names, military jargon

Abstract

This paper is concerned with a linguistic analysis of selected popular names of the United States Armed Forces airplanes and military equipment. The study takes into consideration the strictly metaphorical character of the naming conventions and makes primary use of the conceptual metaphor theory. In the analysis, it is claimed that the emergence of metaphorical names for military vehicles and equipment is motivated by the experiential reality of language users and the character of armed service. Thus a number of conceptual metaphors are identified. This paper is essentially an abridged version of the author’s Bachelor’s thesis supervised by dr Joanna Redzimska at the University of Gdańsk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Karol Plichta , University of Gdansk

Karol Plichta – absolwent filologii angielskiej; doktorant na Wydziale Filologicznym Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego. Jego zainteresowania naukowe obejmują językoznawstwo kognitywne, w szczególności zagadnienia metafory pojęciowej.

References

Black M., 1954, Metaphor, “Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society”, New Series, Vol. 55 (1954–1955), New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.

Black M., 1979, More about Metaphor. In Ortony A., ed., Metaphor & Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Golubiewski M., 2012, Angielszczyzna wojskowa, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.

Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff G., 1987, Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Thorne S., 2006, The language of war, London: Routledge.

United States Department of Defense, 2004, Model Designation of Military Aerospace Vehicles, Washington.

Published

2017-12-06

How to Cite

Plichta , K. . (2017). Conceptual metaphors in the naming convention of the United States Armed Forces. Progress, (2), 9–20. Retrieved from https://czasopisma.bg.ug.edu.pl/index.php/Progress/article/view/4630