Autonomous approach to English language learning and teaching in senior classes of secondary school

Authors

  • Magdalena Toporek University of Gdansk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/prog.2021.10.06

Keywords:

autonomy, autonomous learner, language acquisition, language learning, language teaching

Abstract

The concept of autonomy in foreign language teaching is one of the most intriguing issues in the methodology of teaching and certainly one of the most difficult challenges for Polish education. Specialists agree that autonomy should be perceived in a complex, multidimensional way, taking into account its individual components such as motivation, self-esteem or independence, as well as a number of associations with various forms of practicing autonomy, including individual and team learning, the use of authentic materials, language guidance, and a negotiated syllabus. The main objective of this article is to broaden the understanding of the autonomous process of foreign language acquisition, with a particular emphasis on the approach to both learning and teaching English in senior-year classes of secondary school. This paper mainly aims to establish whether Polish high school graduates show the characteristics of autonomous learners, and further to shed light on to what extent classes are conducted following the promoted principle of student autonomy, and finally, it determines whether both students and teachers use the potential of independent learning and teaching, or whether their priority is exclusively to prepare for the upcoming exam. The findings indicate that although the greater number of graduating class students possess the characteristics of an autonomous learner, i.e., they have developed metacognitive and cognitive strategies along with an awareness of their strengths and weaknesses, in most cases the development of autonomy encounters many obstacles due to the reluctance or lack of awareness of teachers themselves and institutional constraints such as curricula and examination requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Magdalena Toporek, University of Gdansk

Magdalena Toporek – absolwentka studiów magisterskich na kierunku lingwistyka stosowana. Obecnie doktorantka w Szkole Doktorskiej Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego w dyscyplinie językoznawstwo. Jej zainteresowania badawcze koncentrują się wokół dydaktyki języków obcych, autonomicznego podejścia do nauki i nauczania oraz pojęcia sukcesu.

References

Adamson S., Ayres-Bennett W., 2011, Linguistics and Philology in the Twenty-First Century: Introduction, “Transactions of the Philological Society”, Vol. 109, No. 3.

Allwright D., 1990, Autonomy in language pedagogy in CRILE Working Paper 6. Centre for Research in Education: University of Lancaster.

Benson P., 2001, Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning, London.

Benson P. (ed.), 2009, Qualitative Research in Language Teaching and Learning Journals, 1997–2006, “The Modern Language Journal”, Vol. 93, No.1.

Benson P., Cooker L. (eds.), 2013, The applied linguistic individual: sociocultural approaches to identity, agency and autonomy, Equinox.

Benson P., 2017, Autonomy in Language Teaching and Learning, “Language Teaching”, Vol. 40, No. 1.

Boud D., 1998, Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, Kogan Page, USA.

Betts G., 2004, Fostering Autonomous Learners through Levels of Differentiation, „ Roeper Review”, Vol. 26, No. 4.

Bravo J.C. (ed.), 2017, Motivation and Autonomy in Learning English as Foreign Language: A Case Study of Ecuadorian College Students, „ English Language Teaching”, Vol. 10, No. 2.

Cichon M., 2004, Od autonomii nauczyciela do autonomii ucznia: miejsce autonomii w kształceniu metodycznym studentów neofilologii [in:] M. Pawlak (ed), Autonomia w nauce języka obcego, UAM, Poznań.

Dam L., 2000, Evaluating autonomous learning [in:] B. Sinclair, I. McGrath, T. Lamb, Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy. Future directions, Harlow.

Deci E., Flaste R., 1996, Why We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation, USA.

Dörnyei Z., 2003, Questionnaires in second language research: construction, administration, and processing, New York.

Everhard C.J., 2012, Re-placing the jewel in the crown of autonomy: A revisiting of the ‘self’ or ‘selves’ in self-access, „ Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal”, Vol. 3, No. 4.

Everhard C.J., 2015, The Assessment-Autonomy Relationship [in:] C.J. Everhard, L. Murphy (eds.) Assessment and Autonomy in Language Learning, London.

Federowicz M. et al., 2015, Dynamika przemian w edukacji i diagnoza problemów do rozwiązania, Warszawa.

Holec H., 1981, Autonomy and foreign language learning, Oxford.

Hui Y., 2010, Teacher-learner autonomy in second language acquisition, „Canadian Social Science”, Vol. 6, No. 1.

Iluk, J., 2013, Jak (de)motywujemy uczniów na lekcjach języka obcego?, „Języki Obce w Szkole”, Vol. 4.

Jiao, L., 2005, Promoting EFL learner autonomy, „ Sino-US English Teaching”, No. 17.

Kolber M., 2012, Strategie uczenia się języka jako narzędzie w kształtowaniu autonomii ucznia, „Forum Dydaktyczne”, nr 9–10.

Lamb T., 2008, Learner autonomy and teacher autonomy: Synthesising an agenda, in: Learner and teacher autonomy: concepts, realities and responses. Amsterdam.

Lantolf J., Pavlenko A., 2001, (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding learners as people. In: Breen, Michael P., eds. Learner contributions to language learning: new directions in research, Harlow.

Little D., 1999, Definitions, Issues and Problems, Dublin.

Little D., 2000, We’re all in it together: exploring the interdependence of teacher and learner autonomy [in:] L. Karlsson, F. Kjisik, J. Nordlund (eds.), All Together Now, Papers from the 7th Nordic Conference and Workshop on Autonomous Language Learning, September 2000, Helsinki.

Little D., 2003, Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning [in:] The Guide to Good Practice for Learning and Teaching in Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies [electronic], CIEL Language Support network.

Little D., 2012, Learner autonomy and second/foreign language learning, http://www.llas.ac.uk/resources/gpg/1409 [access: 28th November 2020].

Macaro E., 1997, Target language, collaborative learning and autonomy, Great Britain.

Nation I.S.P., 2001, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, Cambridge.

Norton B., 2000, Identity and language learning: gender, ethnicity and educational change, Harlow.

O’Brien T., Guiney D., 2001, Differentiation in Teaching and Learning: Principles and Practice, London.

Opałka B., 2002, Dlaczego i jak wdrażać autonomię uczącego się na lektoracie? [in:] W. Wilczyńska, Wokół autonomizacji w dydaktyce języków obcych: badania i refleksje, Poznań.

Pawlak M., 2017, The Role of Autonomy in Learning and Teaching Foreign Language Grammar [in:] M. Pawlak, A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak, J. Bielak (eds.), Autonomy in second language learning: Managing the resources, Cham.

Rahman Abd., 2018, Building Autonomous Learners in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Classroom, „ Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research”, Vol. 115.

Raoofi Saeid, et al., 2014, Metacognition and Second/Foreign Language Learning, “English Language Teaching”, Vol. 7, No. 1.

Wilczyńska W., 2002, Wokół autonomizacji w dydaktyce języków obcych, Poznań.

Wiśniewska D., 2001, Rola nauczyciela w kształtowaniu autonomii ucznia, „Neofilolog”, No. 20.

Wiśniewska H., 2017, Learner Autonomy: The Role of Educational Materials in Fostering Self-evaluation [in:] M. Pawlak, A. Mystkowska-Wiertelak, J. Bielak (eds.), Autonomy in second language learning: Managing the resources, Cham.

Yagcioglu O., 2015, New Approaches on Learner Autonomy in Language Learning, „Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences”, Vol. 199.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-22

How to Cite

Toporek, M. (2021). Autonomous approach to English language learning and teaching in senior classes of secondary school. Progress, (9-10), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.26881/prog.2021.10.06