Academic Scientific JournalsThe emergence of human consciousness in the context of the evolution of language
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2025.3.02Keywords:
evolution of language, shared attention, Mirror System Hypothesis, displacement, anoetic, autonoetic and noetic consciousnessAbstract
The paper presents a proposal for perceiving the development of human consciousness as related to the evolution of human speech. It discusses the development of language in evolutionary terms, relying on the theory of mind (Premack and Woodruff 1978) – especially the phenomenon of shared attention (Tomasello 2019), the Recruitment Theory (Bickerton 2009) and the Mirror System Hypothesis (Arbib 2008). Furthermore, the emergence of speech as well as gradual changes, resembling in principle, the processes of biological evolution, are compared and used in order to account for the appearance of human consciousness. Furthermore, consciousness is discussed in relation to types of memory (Tulving 1985), and the relation of an individual to him or herself or to the world outside (Janczukowicz and Wenzel 2021). A set of characteristic mental features necessary for the evolution of language are drawn from these theories – consistently with those proposed by Wacewicz and Żywiczyński (2015) – and are argued as most likely to have led to the emergence of consciousness.
Downloads
References
Altares, Guillermo (2023). “The enigma of the Lascaux Bird Man: The erection that embodies the mysteries of prehistoric art”. El Pais USA 30 March. Available at <https://english.elpais.com/opinion/2023-03-30/the-enigma-of-the-lascaux-bird-man>. Accessed 25.09.2024.
Arbib, Michael A. (2008). “Mirror neurons and language”. In: Brigitte Stemmer, Harry A. Whitaker (eds.). Handbook of Neuroscience of Language. London – Burlington, MA: Academic Press, Elsevier, 237–246.
Arbib, Michael A., Dorothy M. Fragaszy, Susan D. Healy, Dietrich Stout (2023). “Tooling and construction: From nut-cracking and stone-tool making to bird nests and language”. Current Research in Behavioural Sciences 5: 100121.
Bassett, Danielle S., Michael S. Gazzaniga (2015). “Understanding complexity in the human brain”. Trends in Cognitive Science 15/5: 200–209.
Bickerton, Derek (2009). Adam’s Tongue: How Humans Made Language, How Language Made Humans. New York: Hill and Wang.
Bloom, Paul (2018). Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. London: Vintage.
Bruner, Jerome (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
Corballis, Michael C. (2002). From Hand to Mouth. The Origins of Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
James, William (2010 [1890]). The Principles of Psychology. Vol. 1. Digireads.com Publishing.
Janczukowicz, Karolina, Ryszard Wenzel (2021). The Phenomenon of Consciousness: Educational Perspective. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Kurcz, Ida (2011). “Charakterystyka kompetencji językowej – reprezentacje umysłowe”. In: Ida Kurcz, Hanna Okuniewska (eds.). Język jako przedmiot badań psychologicznych: Psycholingwistyka ogólna i neurolingwistyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SWPS “Academica”, 80–105.
Liebenberg, Louis (1990). The Art of Tracking: The Origin of Science. Claremont: David Philip.
Pinker, Steven (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow and Company.
Pinker, Steven, Paul Bloom (1990). “Natural languages and natural selection”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707–726.
Premack, David, Guy Woodruff (1978). “Does a chimpanzee have a theory of mind?” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4: 515–526.
Seyfarth Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney, Peter Marler (1980). “Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free ranging primate”. Animal Behaviour 28/4: 1070–1094.
The British Museum (2018). “Lion Man”. In: Smart History, 30.03.2018. Available at <https://smarthistory.org/lion-man2/>. Accessed 25.09.2024.
Tomasello, Michael (2019). Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny. Cambridge, MA – London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Tulving, Endel (1985). “Memory and consciousness”. Canadian Psychology 26/1: 1–12.
Wacewicz, Sławomir, Przemysław Żywiczyński (2015). “Language evolution: Why Hockett’s design features are a non-starter”. Biosemiotics 8/1: 29–46.
