Academic Scientific JournalsThe role of metaphor and metonymy in constructing the image of a university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2025.3.04Keywords:
metaphor, metonymy, university documents, image constructionAbstract
The aim of this paper is to identify metaphors and metonymies used in selected documents (“About” pages, reports, strategies etc.) of leading universities in five regions: China, the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia and North America (Canada and the United States). The research framework is provided by the theory of conceptual metaphor proposed by Lakoff and Johnson in Metaphors We Live By (1980). In their documents, the universities frequently employ animalization and personification, building metaphors and travel metaphors as well as the metonymy BODY PART FOR THE HUMAN BEING. The identified metaphorical and metonymic expressions are conventional, and their role is to facilitate creating the image of the universities as living, vibrant institutions, ready to change and react to the challenges posed by the modern world.
Downloads
References
Anthony, Laurence (2022). AntConc (Version 4.1.0). Computer software. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at https://www.laurenceanthony. net/software/antconc/. Accessed 12.06.2022.
Barcelona, Antonio (2000). “The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy”. In: Antonio Barcelona (ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–30.
Barcelona, Antonio (ed.) (2000). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2009). Metaphor and political communication. In: Andreas Musolff, Jörg Zinken (eds.). Metaphor and Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–115.
Cieślicka, Anna (2002). “Metaphors of teaching and learning: Investigating bilingual metaphorical competence”. In: Danuta Stanulewicz (ed.). PASE Papers in Language Studies: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English. Gdańsk, 26–28 April 2000. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 383–392.
Cortazzi, Martin, L. Lixian Jin (1999). “Bridges to learning: Metaphors of teaching, learning and language”. In: Lynne Cameron, Graham Low (eds.). Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–176.
Crystal, David (1994 [1992]). An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Language and Languages. London: Penguin Books.
Dirven, René et al. (eds.) (2002). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin – New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fabiszak, Małgorzata (2007). A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and Its Implications. Poznań: Wydawnitwo Naukowe UAM.
Gibbs, Raymond (1999). “Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world”. In: Raymond Gibbs, Gerard Steen (eds.). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 145–166.
Gibbs, Raymond, Gerard Steen (eds.) (1999). Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goossens, Louis (1990). “Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action”. Cognitive Linguistics 1/3: 323–342.
Górska, Elżbieta, Günter Radden (eds.) (2005). Metonymy–Metaphor Collage. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
Kalisz, Roman (2001). “Types of metaphor: A cognitive view”. In: Olga Kubińska, David Malcolm (eds.). Paradoksy humanistyki: Księga pamiątkowa ku czci Profesora Andrzeja Zgorzelskiego. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Kiliańska-Przybyło, Grażyna (2007). “Metafory w klasie szkolnej, czyli kogo uczymy i gdzie?”. Języki Obce w Szkole 52/5: 36–39.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. (1991). “Metaphor – metaphorization – cognition”. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 43–45: 83–95.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George, Mark Johnson (2003). Metaphors We Live By: With a New Afterword. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press.
Musiał, Anna (2002). “Exploring teacher trainees’ metaphors of language teaching”. In: Danuta Stanulewicz (ed.). PASE Papers in Language Studies: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English. Gdańsk, 26–28 April 2000. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 463–470.
Ortony, Andrew (ed.) (1979). Metaphor and Thought. London – New York – Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Reddy, Michael (1979). “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language”. In: Andrew Ortony (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. London – New York – Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 284–324.
Siek-Piskozub, Teresa, Ariadna Strugielska (2010). “Capturing educational change in conceptual metaphors: Implications for teacher education”. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education 2/2: 61–69.
Stanulewicz, Danuta (2009). “Metaphorically speaking, they are travellers, wild animals, clay and tabula rasa: How teachers conceptualize learners”. In: Maria Wysocka (ed.). On Language Structure, Acquisition and Teaching: Studies in Honour of Professor Janusz Arabski on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 474–483.
Stanulewicz, Danuta (2017). “Metafory studiowania – według studentów kierunków neofilologicznych”. In: Joanna Mampe, Jolanta Hinz, Adam Jarosz (eds.). Problemy współczesnej glottodydaktyki i nauczania przekładu. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 107–121.
Strugielska, Ariadna, Teresa Siek-Piskozub (2008). “Conceptual metaphors as a reflection of personal experience in education”. In: Zdzisław Wąsik, Tomasz Komendziński (eds.). Metaphor and Cognition. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 117–131.
Strugielska, Ariadna, Teresa Siek-Piskozub (2013). “A usage-based model of linguistic metaphors: Inferences for the cognitive theory of metaphor and teacher education”. In: Katarzyna Piątkowska, Ewa Kościałkowska-Okońska (eds.). Correspondences and Contrasts in Foreign Language Pedagogy and Translation Studies. Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London: Springer, 17–30.
Sweetser, Eve (1987). “Metaphorical models of thought and speech: A comparison of historical directions and metaphorical mappings in the two domains”. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 446–459.
Uberman, Agnieszka (2022). “Metaphors describing America in Obama's first presidential campaign – A case study of the presidential memoir A Promised Land”. Lege Artis: Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow 7/2: 116–151.
Wąsik, Zdzisław, Tomasz Komendziński (eds.) (2008). Metaphor and Cognition. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Yang, Meimei (2019). “Organizational identity construction of the world’s top universities: A discourse analysis of university prospectuses”. Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 16/1: 95– 109.
Yang, Meimei (2024). Institutional Identity Construction of World Top Universities: An Analysis of Documents Facilitating Internationalization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Gdańsk: University of Gdańsk.
