Reviewing procedure

  1. All articles sent to “Ethnography…” are submitted for peer review. 
  2. The peer review process is supervised by particular thematic editors, who specialize in the research unit affiliated by the author of the article. 
  3. The editor-in-chief or thematic editor appoint two independent peer reviewers:
  • Peer reviewers are specialists in the field of study affiliated by the author of the article. 
  • Peer reviewers and authors shall not remain in the conflict of interest. 
  • Peer reviewers and authors do not know each other’s identity (double-blind review process).
  1. A written peer review contains an unambiguous conclusion concerning the conditions of the reviewed article for acceptance, further work, or rejection.
  2. When the peer review process is completed, the author of the article receives feedback concerning the reviewers’ opinion and their comments and recommendations.  
  3. The peer reviews must not use the knowledge of the article prior to its’ publication. 
  4. The final agreement for publication is due to the editor-in-chief decision. The qualification is based on two written peer reviews. 
  5. Names of the peer reviewers are made public on the website of the journal, inside the paper version of the journal, and its electronic version annually.