Narration as attraction. Mind-game films and postclassical spectacles

Autor

  • Barbara Szczekała Badaczka niezależna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/pan.2021.26.05

Słowa kluczowe:

mind-game films, postclassical cinema, “post-plot” blockbusters

Abstrakt

The article is a theoretical proposal which aims to create an alternative framework for mapping postclassical cinema. This framework is based on establishing various modes of relations between narration and spectacle, especially those represented by mind-game films and post-plot films. Instead of considering narration and spectacle as opposition, I suggest redescribing their complementary dynamics. I argue that there is visible feedback between mind-game films and the cinema of digital attractions, which I see as complementary processes of making “spectacular mind games” and “mind-gaming the spectacles”. The article contains an analysis of similar types of cinematic experiences delivered by “narration” and “attractions” and indicates the mutual influences between these two phenomena. Both narration and attraction may bring similar, affective sensations: the notion of shock and dissonance, discomfort, astonishment, kinesthetic impulse or cognitive stimulation.

As for the article’s conclusion: postclassical cinema variously reshapes the distribution of narration and attraction. Mind-game films are becoming cinematic spectacles. On the other hand, more and more “post-plot” blockbusters are introducing the “mind-gaming the spectacle” strategy, and are engaging viewers with “cognitive” attractions as well.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Bal, M. (1997). Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative 2nd edition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Bordwell, D. (2002). Film Futures. “SubStance”, 97.

Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the Fiction Film, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Bordwell, D. (2006). The Way Hollywood Tells It. Story and Style in Modern Movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Branigan, E. (1984). Point of View in the Cinema. Berlin: Mouton Publishers.

Brown, W. (2014). Complexity and Simplicity in “Inception” and “Dedicated to Ozu, in Hollywood Puzzle Films.

Buckland, W. (ed.). London: Routledge. Bukatman, S. (1998). Zooming Out: The End of Offscreen Space, in The New American Cinema.

Lewis, J. (ed.). Durham: Duke University Press.

Buckland, W. (2009). Introduction: Puzzle Plots. in Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema.

Buckland, W. (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Cameron, A. (2008), Modular Narratives in Contemporary Cinema. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Caillois, R. (2001). Man, Play and Games, trans. By Barash, M. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Denson, S. (2016), Crazy Cameras, Discorrelated Images, and the Post-Perceptual Meditation of Post-Cinematic Affect. in Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film, Denson, S., Leyda, J. Falmer: Reframe Books.

Denson, S., Leyda, J. (2016). Perspectives on Post-Cinema: An Introduction. in Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film, Denson, S., Leyda, J. Falmer: Reframe Books. E

isenstein, S. (1988 [1923]).The Montage of Attractions. in Writings, vol. I, 1922–34, ed. and trans. by Taylor, R. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.

Elsaesser, T. (2004). The New Film History as Media Archaeology. “Cinemas”. 14(2–3). ́

Elsaesser, T. (2009). The Mind-Game Film. in Puzzle Films: Complex Storytelling in Con- temporary Cinema.

Buckland, W. (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Elsaesser, T. (2011) James Cameron’s Avatar: access for all. “New Review of Film and Television Studies”, 9(3).

Elsaesser, T. (2017). Cinema and Game Spaces: Contingency as Our New Causality. in Clash of Realities 2015/16: On the Art, Technology and Theory of Digital Games. Proceedings of the 6th and 7th Conference, Clash of Realities (ed.) (Bielefeld: transcript).

Elsaesser, T., Hagener M. (2010). Film Theory: An Introduction Through the Senses. New York: Routledge.

Hven, S. (2017). Cinema and Narrative Complexity: Embodying the Fabula. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Friedman, S. (2017). Are You Watching Closely?: Cultural Paranoia, New Technologies, and the Contemporary Hollywood Misdirection Film. New York: State University of New York Press.

Gallese, V., Guerra, M. (2012). Embodying Movies: Embodied Simulation and Film Studies. “Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image”, 3.

Gaudreault, A. (2009). From Plato to Lumière: Narration and Monstration in Literature and Cinema, trans. by Barnard, T. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Gunning, T. (2009). An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and the (In)Credulous Spectator. in Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Braudy, L., Cohen, M. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gunning, T. (1999). Cinema of Attractions: Early Film, Its Spectator and the Avant-Garde. in Early cinema: space-frame-narrative. Gunning, T., Elsaesser, T., Barker, A. (eds.). London: BFI Publishing.

Gurevitch, L. (2016). Cinema Designed: Visual Effects Software and the Emergence of the Engineered Spectacle in Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st-Century Film.

Denson, S., Leyda, J. (eds.). Falmer: Reframe Books. Kinder, M. (2003). Designing a Database Cinema. in Future Cinema: The Cinematic Imaginary After Film, Shaw, J., Weibel, P., (eds.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

King, G. (2000). Spectacular Narratives: Hollywood in the Age of the Blockbuster. London: I. B. Tauris.

King, G. (2016). Quality Hollywood: Markers of Distinction in Contemporary Studio Film. London: I.B. Tauris.

Kiss, M., Willemsen, S. (2017). Impossible Puzzle Films. A Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Complex Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Kovács, A. B. (2007). Screening Modernism: European Art Cinema 1950-1980. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Massumi, B. (1995). The Autonomy of Affect. “Cultural Critique”, No. 31, The Politics of Systems and Environments, Part II.

McClean, S. T. (2009). Digital Storytelling: The Narrative Power of Visual Effects in Film. London: MIT Press.

Pisters, P. (2012). The Neuro-Image: A Deleuzian Film-Philosophy of Digital Screen Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Poulaki, M. (2014). Puzzled Hollywood and the Return of Complex Films. in Hollywood Puzzle Films. Buckland, W. (ed.). London: Routledge 2014.

Przylipiak, M. (2016). Kino stylu zerowego. Dwadzieścia lat poź niej. Sopot: Gdańskie ́ Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Ryan, M.-L. (2013). Transmedial Storytelling and Transfictionality. in ”Poetics Today” 34 (3).

Ryan, M.-L. (2014). Story/Worlds/Media: Tuning the Instruments of a Media-Conscious Narratology. in Storyworlds Across Media. Toward a Media-Conscious Narratology.

Thon, J.-N., Ryan, M.-L. (eds.). Lincoln, London: University of Nebraska Press.

Shaviro, S. (2010). Post-Cinematic Affect. Winchester: Zero.

Shaviro, S. (2016). Post-Continuity: An Introduction’, in Post-Cinema: Theorizing 21st- Century Film. Denson, S., Leyda, J. (eds.). Falmer: Reframe Books.

Shklovskij, V. (1998 [1917]). Art as Technique. in Literary Theory: An Anthology.

Rivkin, J., Ryan, M. (eds.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

Stork, M. (2011). Chaos Cinema [Parts 1 and 2]: The Decline and Fall of Action Filmmaking. “Press Play”.

Thanouli, E. (2009). Post-Classical Cinema: An International Poetics of Film Narration. London: Wallflower Press.

Thon, Jan-N., (2015). Converging Worlds. From Transmedial Storyworlds to Transmedial Universes, in “Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies” 7(2).

Zeitchik, S. (2014). Guardians of the Galaxy and the rise of post-plot cinema’. Los Angeles Times, 4 August.

Opublikowane

2021-10-19

Jak cytować

Szczekała, B. . (2021). Narration as attraction. Mind-game films and postclassical spectacles. Panoptikum, (26), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.26881/pan.2021.26.05

Numer

Dział

Artykuły