Participant Action Research (PAR) for early childhood and primary education: the example of the THRIECE project

Autor

  • Leah O’Toole Maynooth University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2020.49.03

Słowa kluczowe:

uczestniczące badania interwencyjne, edukacja holistyczna, włączająca, relacyjna

Abstrakt

This paper explores the potential benefits of Participant Action Research (PAR) for early childhood and primary education. It presents the example of the Erasmus+ funded THRIECE (Teaching for Holistic, Relational and Inclusive Early Childhood Education) project, and drawing on the reflections of its participants, supports PAR as a respectful, inclusive, relevant approach to educational research that can lead to deep personal and intercultural learning. It highlights the importance of embracing the ‘messiness’ of action research, and allowing its non-linear complexity to enhance both process and outcomes. It explores the potential of PAR to allow for investigation of and value for the embodied, tacit knowledge and understandings of expert educators, supporting continuous development of practice and providing the language for educators to explain their approaches. Finally, it identifies the crucial nature of a relational approach for the success of Participant Action Research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Bibliografia

Baumfield V., Hall E., Wall K. (2013), Action Research in Education: Learning Through Practitioner Enquiry. London, Sage Publications.

Blair E. (2010), How does telling the truth help educational action research? “Educational Action Research”, 18(3).

Bowlby J. (1969), Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1: Attachment. New York, Basic Books.

Bronfenbrenner U., Morris P.A. (2006), The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In: R.M. Lerner, W.E. Damon (eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical Models of Human Development. West Sussex, John Wiley and Sons.

Carr M., Lee W. (2012), Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education. London, Sage.

Clark A., Moss P. (2009), Listening to Young Children: The Mosaic Approach. London, National Children’s Bureau and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Eisner E.W. (1985), The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. Abingdon, Taylor & Francis.

Gergen K.J. (1973). Social Psychology as History. “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 26(2).

Giangreco M.F., Taylor S.J. (2003). Scientifically Based Research and Qualitative Inquiry. “Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities”, 28(3).

Goodnough K. (2008), Dealing with Messiness and Uncertainty in Practitioner Research: The Nature of Participatory Action Research. “Canadian Journal of Education/ Revue Canadienne de l’Éducation”, 31(2).

Greenback P. (2003), The Role of Values in Educational Research: The Case for Reflexivity. “British Educational Research Journal”, 29(6).

Hall E., Wall K. (2019), Research methods for understanding professional learning. London, Bloomsbury.

Hamre B.K., Pianta R.C. (2006), Student-Teacher Relationships. In: G.G. Bear, K.M. Minke (eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention. National Association of School Psychologists.

Kiely J., O’Toole L., Brosnan M.H., O’Brien E.Z., O’Keeffe C., Dunne C.M. (2019), Parental Involvement, Engagement and Partnership in their Children’s Learning during the Primary School Years. Part 2: (A) Case Studies and (B) Oral Language Workshops. Dublin: NCCA/NPC. Available at https://www.mie.ie/en/research/parental_involvement_engagement_and_partnership_in_their_children%E2%80%99s_education_during_the_primary_school_years/, 10.03.2020.

Kleine D., Pearsons G., Poveda S. (2016), Participatory Methods: Engaging Children’s Voices and Experiences in Research. London, Global Kids Online.

Klocker N. (2015), Participatory Action Research: The Distress of (not) Making a Difference. “Emotion, Space and Society”, 17.

Lather P. (2006), Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: Teaching research in education as a wild profusion. “International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education”, 19(1).

McDonagh C., Roche M., Sullivan B., Glenn M. (2019), Enhancing Practice through Classroom Research: A Teacher’s Guide to Professional Development. London, Routledge.

McIntyre A. (2008), Participatory Action Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage.

Mukherji P., Albon D. (2018), Research Methods in Early Childhood: An Introductory Guide. London, Sage.

Ó Breacháin A. (2016), Mind-bodies, Interdependent Opposites and Knots: A Phenomenological Inquiry into the Child-Teacher Relationship in Upper Primary School. Doctoral dissertation, PhD dissertation, University of Exeter.

O’Connor A. (2013), Understanding Transitions in the Early Years: Supporting Change through Attachment and Resilience. Oxon, Routledge.

O’Toole L. (2016), A bio-ecological perspective on educational transition: experiences of children, parents and teachers. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Dublin, Institute of Technology, Ireland.

O’Toole L., Hayes N. (2019), Supporting positive behaviour in early years settings and primary schools: Relationships, reciprocity and reflective practice. London, Routledge.

O’Toole L., Regan C., Nowak-Łojewska A. (2019), ‘To learn with’ as an alternative voice for children’s education. Introduction to a European project: Teaching for Holistic, Relational and Inclusive Early Childhood Education (THRIECE). “Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny”, 251(1).

Palaiologou I. (2008), Childhood Observation. Cornwall, England, Learning Matters.

Porter L., Slade C., Butt A., Rosier J., Perkins T., Crookes L., Inch A., Slade J., Bassa F., Petzer B., Winkler T., Saija L., Barry J. (2015), Partnerships of learning for planning education Who is learning what from whom? The beautiful messiness of learning partnerships/Experiential learning partnerships in Australian and New Zealand higher education planning programmes/Res non verba? rediscovering the social purpose of planning (and the university): The Westfield Action Research Project/At the coalface. Take 2: Lessons from students’ critical reflections/Education for “cubed change”/Unsettling planning education through community-engaged teaching and learning: Reflections on the Indigenous Planning Studio. “Planning Theory & Practice”, 16(3).

Potter S. (2020), Therapy with a Map: A Cognitive Analytic Approach to Helping Relationships. Brighton, Pavillion.

Riley P. (2011), Attachment Theory and the Teacher-Student Relationship. London, Routledge.

Rogers C.R. (1995), Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London, Constable.

Rogoff B. (2003), The Cultural Nature of Human Development. New York, Oxford University Press.

Ryle A., Kerr I.B. (2002), Introducing cognitive analytic therapy: Principles and practice. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.

Sahlberg P. (2014), Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? New York, Teachers College Press.

Schön D. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Surrey, Ashgate.

Shamrova D.P., Cummings C.E. (2017), Participatory action research (PAR) with children and youth: An integrative review of methodology and PAR outcomes for participants, organizations, and communities. “Children and Youth Services Review”, 81.

Spooner F., Browder D.M. (2003), Scientifically Based Research in Education and Students with Low Incidence Disabilities. “Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities”, 28(3).

Steinberg L., Darling N.E., Fletcher A.C. (1995), Authoritative Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment: An Ecological Journey. In: P. Moen, G.H. Elder Jr., K. Luscher (eds.), Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.

Sullivan B., Glenn M., Roche M., McDonagh C. (2016), Introduction to Critical Reflection and Action for Teacher Researchers. London, Routledge.

Trevarthen C. (2017), The affectionate, intersubjective intelligence of the infant and its innate motives for relational mental health. “International Journal of Cognitive Analytic Therapy and Relational Mental Health”, 1.

Urban M., Vandenbroeck M., Van Laere K., Lazzari A., Peeters J. (2012), Towards Competent Systems in Early Childhood Education and Care. Implications for Policy and Practice. “European Journal of Education”, 47(4).

van Manen M. (1990), Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY, State University of New York Press.

Zhu Y. (2019), Can Participatory Action Research “Empower” Participants in Adult Educational Studies? “Canadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education”, 31(1).

Opublikowane

2020-06-17

Jak cytować

O’Toole, L. (2020). Participant Action Research (PAR) for early childhood and primary education: the example of the THRIECE project. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji, 49(2), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2020.49.03

Numer

Dział

Rozprawy i artykuły