The possibility of using Cooperative Development in pre-service teacher development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.3.05Keywords:
Cooperative Development, pre-service teacher development, teaching practice, reflection, dialogical interaction, teaching practice journalAbstract
Cooperative Development (CD) is viewed by its creator, Julian Edge (1992), as a model of interaction to support the development of teaching professionals by which they become more aware of their practice as they are empowered to act within and upon it with increased confidence. Based upon equality and cooperation, in CD experiential understanding is valued as much as intellectual comprehension, while speaking and being listened to as aids to thinking and deeper reflection are paramount to the approach. Edge also believes that CD has a limited application in most teaching-learning situations, where equality is not usually the norm. The authors of the article, however, consider the use of CD with pre-service teachers during their teaching practices as an approach that, if implemented, may foster greater awareness and confidence in student-teachers as well alleviate one of the problems of the present system that exists in the Institute of English and American Studies (IEAS) at the University of Gdańsk: a heavy reliance upon written documentation produced by the students which is, de facto, a way of monitoring the practices after their completion rather than providing support for students when they are involved in them. In considering whether or not teaching practices based upon CD are feasible in IEAS, the following areas are examined: CD as an approach in teacher development, the level of acceptance of dialogical practices in Polish education generally, the present system of teaching practices in IEAS, data gathered from previous research connected with those practices, as well as analysis of documentation connected with their administration. Measures that would have to be undertaken if CD were to be implemented as an approach in support of pre-service teacher development are also considered in the discussion.
Downloads
References
Ary, Donald, Lucy C. Jacobs, Ashgar Razavieh, Christine K. Sorenson (2009). Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Blaszk, Martin. “Is there a Community of Practice with Regard to Teaching Practices?” (in print).
Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2019). Available at www.prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20190001450. Accessed 24.01. 2020.
Edge, Julian (1992). Cooperative Development. London: Longman.
Edge, Julian (2011). The Reflexive Teacher Educator in TESOL: Roots and Wings. New York, London: Routledge.
Freire, Paulo. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.
Gabryś-Baker, Dorota. (2012). Reflectivity in Pre-Service Teacher Education. A Survey of Theory and Practice. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Howard, Amanda, Donaghue, Helen (eds.) (2015).Teacher Evaluation in Second Language Education. London, New York, New Delhi, Oxford, Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
Instrukcja Postępowania (2019). Available at fil.ug.edu.pl/studenci/praktyki/ instrukcja_postepowania. Accessed 24.01.2020.
Karpińska-Musiał, Beata (ed.) (2016). W trosce o jakość w ilości. Tutoring oksfordzki w Uniwersyteckie Gdańskim. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Libron.
Karpińska-Musiał, Beata (2017). “The educational rhetoric of empowerment in academic tutoring. The teacher’s and student’s perspectives”. Beyond Philology, 14/1: 205-224.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lankiewicz, Hadrian. (2015). Teacher Language Awareness in the Ecological Perspective. A Collaborative Inquiry Based on Languaging. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
Nunan, David (1989a). Understanding Language Classrooms. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Nunan, David. (1989b). “A client-centered approach to teacher development”. ELT Journal 43/2: 111-118.
Plan studiów (2019). Available at https://fil.ug.edu.pl/sites/default/files/_nodes/strona-filologiczny/12946/files/i_ba-n_19-20_filologia.angielska-stacjonarne.pierwszego.stopnia.19-20_06.09.2019.pdf. Accessed 04.02.2020.
Plan zajęć – stacjonarne (2020). Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/15KgzI0-k5UFIi5k7YSA5yooQl3qfcPa5/view. Accessed 14.02.2020.
Potulicka, Eugenia, Joanna Rutkowiak (2012). Neoliberalne uwikłania edukacji. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Praktyki nauczycielskie (2019). Available at https://fil.ug.edu.pl/wydzial_filologiczny/instytuty/instytut_anglistyki_i_amerykanistyki/praktyki/praktyki_nauczycielskieteaching_work_experience. Accessed 04.02.2020.
Underhill, Adrian (1989). “Process in Humanistic Education”. ELT Journal, 43/4: 250-260.
Wallace, Michael J. (1998). Action Research for Language Teachers: A Reflective Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, Michael J. (1993). Training Foreign Language Teachers: A Reflective Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werbińska, Dorota (2017). The Formation of Language Teacher Professional Identity: A Phenomenographic-Narrative Study. Słupsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii Pomorskiej w Słupsku.
Wilczyńska, Weronika, Anna Michońska-Stadnik (2010). Metodologia badań w glottodydaktyce. Wprowadzenie. Kraków: Avalon.
Witkowski, Lech. (2009). Wyzwania autorytetu. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Witkowski, Lech (2011). Historia autorytetu wobec kultury i edukacji. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.
Wright, Anthony (1987). Roles of Teachers and Learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.