From paradigm to paradox – contemporary mainstream theoretical reflections for fieldwork in lowland South America

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/etno.2019.5.10

Keywords:

epistemology, culture, perspectivism

Abstract

This essay intends to address perspectives and reflections on nature and culture in the contemporary anthropological literature . Dialogically engaging with Ingold, Wag- ner, Viveiros de Castro, Descola and Strathern, I aim to demonstrate the implications of understanding culture as an axiomatic point of differentiation of human nature, or as re-elaboration of materiality through human action . This reflection calls us to rethink the Western scientific epistemology, along with its presupposed ontological order . Such questioning unfolds in the elaboration of the ethnographic text, which in turn is the result of a dialectical process that speaks not only of one culture, but of two, and especially of our gaze on the Other . In the ethnographic text, an anthropologist and a native are the potential locus of reproduction of their culture . Through this approach we extend the implications of epistemological concerns to fieldwork practices and to the art of under- standing other knowledge systems .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Virgílio Bomfil Neto, Federal University of Pernambuco in Brazil

Anthropologist, Ph.D. student at the Federal University of Pernambuco in Brazil.
Research interests: human-plant relationships among indigenous peoples of the Amazon, ethnic and colonial relations, shamanism, ethnology of the Pano language family Indians.

References

Bateson, G. (1986). Mente e Natureza – A Unidade Necessária. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.

Descola, P. (2011). As duas naturezas de Lévi-Strauss. Sociologia & Antropologia, v.01.02: 35–51, http://www.ppgsa.ifcs.ufrj.br/evento/revista-sociologia-antropologia/.

Descola, P. (n/d). Más allá de la naturaleza y la cultura. Cultura y Naturaleza. Jardín Botánico de Bogotá José Celestino Mutis. Avaliable in: http://ecaths1.s3.amazonaws.com/teoriasocialcontemporanea/578647752.Descola%20mas%20alla%20de%20la%20naturaleza...pdf.

Graeber, D. (2015). Radical alterity is just another way of saying “reality”. A reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2).

Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2000b). Gente como a gente: O conceito de homem anatomicamente moderno.Ponto Urbe. Edição 9, http://www.pontourbe.net/edicao9–traducoes/213–gente-como-a-gente-o-conceito-de-homem-anatomicamente-moderno.

Ingold, T. (2006). Sobre A Distinção Entre Evolução e História. Antropolítica, Rio de Janeiro,n. 20, 17–36, http://www.uff.br/antropolitica/revistasantropoliticas/revista_antropolitica_20.pdf.

Ingold, T. (2015). Introdução a O que é um animal? Antropolítica, Rio de Janeiro, 22, 129–150,www.uff.br/antropolitica/revistasantropoliticas/revista_antropolitica_22.pdf.

Ingold, T. (2012). Trazendo as coisas de volta à vida: Emaranhados criativos num mundo demateriais. Horizontes Antropológicos, Rio Grande do Sul, ano 18, n. 37, 25–44, jan./jun.

Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Latour, B. (2009) Perspectivism: ‘Type’ or ‘bomb’? Anthropology Today, Apr. vol 25 no. 2, 1–2.

Lévi-Strauss, C. (2010). Mitológicas I: O cru e o cozido. São Paulo. Cosac & Naify.

Lima, T.S. (1996). O dois e seu múltiplo: Reflexões sobre o perspectivismo em uma cosmologia tupi. MANA, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 2, n. 2, 21–47.

Strathern, M. (2014). In: O efeito etnográfico e outros ensaios. São Paulo: Cosac & Naif.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (2002). A inconstância da alma selvagem. São Paulo, Cosac & Naify.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (2002). O Nativo Relativo. MANA 8(1):113–148.

Wagner, R. (1975). The Invention of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Published

2019-12-30

How to Cite

Bomfil Neto, V. (2019). From paradigm to paradox – contemporary mainstream theoretical reflections for fieldwork in lowland South America. Ethnography. Practices, Theories, Experiences, (5), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.26881/etno.2019.5.10