Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweKangur – totem czy esencja? Dwie koncepcje krajobrazu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/etno.2021.7.17Słowa kluczowe:
landscape, totemism, essence, mythological past, relationship with the land, Aborigines, AltaiAbstrakt
The paper analyzes landscapes of indigenous societies. Howard Morphy, in his work focusing on the Aborigines, treated the landscape as a representation of past mythical events. Such an approach involves taking a closer look at the material aspects of landscape and emphasizes the existence of realties between contemporary Aborigines and the past. A different theoretical approach was developed by Tim Ingold, conceptualizing landscape as a human-land relationship based on essence, where all beings derive their essential form and substance directly from the land, which embodies the creative forces of the ancestors. Ingold’s understanding of landscape led me to rethink my research in the Altai Mountains of Southern Siberia, conducted 25 years ago. I argue that the relationship with the land is crucial for the Altaian people. The land’s essence is not changeable and all living beings are its emanation. The landscape is therefore not a record of the past, but an active field in which the relationship between human and non-human subjects and the land is established.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Buggey, S. (2004). An approach to Aboriginal culture landscapes in Canada. W: I. Krup- nik, R. Mason, T.W. Horton (red.), Northern Ethnographic Landscapes. Perspectives from Circumpolar Nations (s. 17–44). Washington: Arctic Studies Center, National Museum of Natural History Washington.
Descola, Ph.((1996). Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice. W: P. Descola, G. Palsson (red.), Nature and society: anthropological perspectives (s. 82–102). London: Routledge.
Halemba, A. (2006). The Telengits of Southern Siberia. Landscape, Religion and Knowledge in Motion. London: Routledge.
Halemba, A. (2008). What does it feel like when your religion moves under your feet? Religion, earthquakes and national unity in the Republic of Altai, Russian Federation. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 133, 283–299.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment. Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London-New York: Routledge.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1998). Totemizm dzisiaj. Tłum. A. Steinsberg, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo KR.
Morphy, H. (1993). Colonialism, history and the construction of place. The politics of land- scape in Northern Australia. W: B. Bender (ed.), Landscape. Politics and Perspectives (Explorations in Anthropology (s. 205–243). Berg, Providence, Oxford.
Morphy, H. (1995). Landscape and the Reproduction of the Ancestral Past. W: E. Hirsch, M. O’Hanlon (ed.), Anthropology of Landscape. Perspectives on Place and Space (s. 184–209). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morphy, H. (2004). Estetyka Aborygenów. Antologia. Przekł. R. Nowakowski. M. Bakke (red.), Kraków: Universitas.
Munn, N.D. (1996). Excluded spaces. The figure in the Australian Aboriginal landscape. Critical Inquiry, 22, 3, 446–465.
Pedersen, M.A. (2001). Totemism, animism and North Asian indigenous ontologies. The Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute, 7, 3, 411–427.
Rose. D.B. (1996). Nourishing Terrains. Australian Aboriginal views of Landscape and Wilderness. Canberra: Australian Heritage Commission.
Smyrski, Ł. (2008). Ajdyn znaczy Księżyc. Narody południowej Syberii. Warszawa: Wydaw- nictwo DiG.
Smyrski, Ł. (2018). Między władzą spojrzenia a praktyką. Antropologia krajobrazu. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Stanner, W.E. (1989). On Aboriginal Religion. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Strehlow, T.G. (1970). Geography and the Totemic Landscape in Central Australia. W: R.M. Berndt (ed.), Australian Aboriginal Anthropology (s. 92–140). Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press.
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Wersje
- 2023-10-17 - (2)
- 2021-12-23 - (1)
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
