Persecution on Grounds of Religion and Granting International Protection: Religious Conversion in Cases before the CJEU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2025.1.08Keywords:
international protection, refugee law, freedom of religion, religious conversion, Common European Asylum System, CJEUAbstract
The article addresses the issue of granting international protection to individuals based on claims regarding violations of their freedom of religion. There are specific aspects of such claims, inter alia, in complex cases of a religious conversion that has occurred after the arrival in a state in which the person concerned is applying for protection. This issue combines such detailed problems as granting protection sur place, the risk of abuse by simulating certain activities, and the issue of verifying the credibility of the applicant. At the same time, however, the approach to this issue reflected in the case law of European courts, i.e. the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights, highlights certain characteristic processes in the framing of international protection as such and, more broadly, international refugee law. This text addresses this detailed issue in the context of analyzing the current CJEU ruling in the case of Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v. JF of 29 February 2024, which concerned the issue of religious conversion after arrival in an EU Member State.
Downloads
References
Bank R., The Potential and Limitations of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Shaping International Refugee Law, „International Journal of Refugee Law” 2015, vol. 27, no. 2.
Chlebny J., Art. 1 ustawy o udzielaniu cudzoziemcom ochrony na terytorium RP [w:] Prawo o cudzoziemcach. Komentarz, red. idem, Warszawa 2020.
EUAA, Practical Guide on Interviewing Applicants with Religion-based Asylum Claims, November 2022.
Goodwin-Gill G.S., McAdam J., The Refugee in International Law, 3rd ed., Oxford 2007.
Horsti K., Pirkkalainen P., Deportability of Christian Converts and the Controversy Over Faith in Finland, „Nordic Journal of Migration Research” 2023, vol. 13, issue 4.
Kälin W., Caroni M., Heim L., Art. 33 [w:] The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A Commentary, ed. A. Zimmermann, Oxford 2011.
Kowalski M., Glosa do wyroku Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej z dnia 26 lutego 2015 r. w sprawie C-472/13, Andre Lawrence Shepherd przeciwko Republice Federalnej Niemiec, „Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego” 2016, t. 14.
Kowalski M., International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe [w:] Transnational Judicial Dialogue in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. A. Wyrozumska, Łódź 2017.
Kowalski M., Znaczenie art. 14 Powszechnej Deklaracji Praw Człowieka dla międzynarodowego prawa uchodźczego [w:] 70 lat Powszechnej Deklaracji Praw Człowieka, red. M. Florczak-Wątor, M. Kowalski, Kraków 2019.
Łachacz O., Zasada non-refoulement w międzynarodowym prawie uchodźczym – zwyczaj międzynarodowy czy też peremptoryjna norma prawa międzynarodowego?, „Problemy Współczesnego Prawa Międzynarodowego, Europejskiego i Porównawczego” 2017, t. 14.
Rose L., Given-Wilson Z., „What Is Truth?” Negotiating Christian Convert Asylum Seekers’ Credibility, „Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science” 2021, vol. 697, issue 1.
UNHCR, Zasady i tryb ustalania statusu uchodźcy zgodnie z Konwencją dotyczącą statusu uchodźcy z 1951 r. oraz Protokołem dodatkowym z 1967 r. Podręcznik, wyd. 2 wersji pol., Warszawa 2007.
Zimmermann A., Mahler C., Article 1A, para. 2 [w:] The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A Commentary, ed. A. Zimmermann, Oxford 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gdańsk Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic Scientific Journals
