Judicial Independence in General and in England and Wales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2025.4.01Keywords:
rule of law, separation of powers, judicial independence, UK constitutional reform, judicial appointmentsAbstract
The article concerns judicial independence. It is a fundamental element of the rule of law. A recent disregard for these ancient requirements of democracy in some countries, including some EU Member States, has caused international concern. This chapter explains the following issues:
– important points about the English legal system, especially the criminal courts;
– the radical reforms to the UK’s ancient, unwritten constitution, under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, remedying defects in the separation of powers and strengthening collective judicial independence;
– the Act’s role in further professionalising judicial recruitment, selection and appointment and enhancing the safeguarding of individual judicial independence. I also explain the international standards for judicial independence;
– the relationship between the three organs of government since the 2005 Act;
– the modernised judicial appointment system and the current diversity statistics. At the end is a very brief section, describing the methods of my own empirical, wide and deep research project on the working lives of judges (2002–2014), which remains unique worldwide.
Downloads
References
The City UK, Legal excellence, internationally renowned: UK legal services 2023,
https://www.thecityuk.com/media/0didtzlm/legal-excellence-internationally-renowned-uk-legalservices-2023.pdf [accessed: 2025.01.12].
The City UK, Legal excellence, internationally renowned: UK legal services 2024,
https://www.thecityuk.com/our-work/uk-legal-services-2024/ [accessed: 2025.01.12].
Darbyshire P., Darbyshire on the English Legal System, 15th ed., London 2025.
Darbyshire P., An essay on the importance and neglect of the magistracy, Criminal Law Review, September 1997, pp. 627–643.
Darbyshire P., Judicial Case Management in Ten Crown Courts, Criminal Law Review 2014, no. 1, pp. 30–50.
Darbyshire P., Sitting in Judgment – The Working Lives of Judges, Oxford 2011.
Gee G., Hazell R., Malleson K., O’Brien P., The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK’s Changing Constitution, Cambridge 2015.
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, JCIO Annual Report 2021–2022,
https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/JCIOAnnual%20Report21-22 [accessed: 2025.01.12].
Review Body on Senior Salaries, Forty-Sixth Annual Report on Senior Salaries 2024. Report No. 97,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66a7a3c849b9c0597fdb066e/SSRB_Annual_Report_2024_Accessible.pdf [accessed: 2025.01.12].
Stevens R., Reform in haste and repent at leisure: Iolanthe, the Lord High Executioner and Brave New World, Legal Studies 2004, vol. 24, no. 1–2, pp. 1–35.
Online sources
British and Irish Legal Information Institute, https://www.bailii.org
Court and Tribunals Judiciary, https://www.judiciary.uk
EUR-Lex, https://eur-lex.europa.eu
European Commission, https://commission.europa.eu
Judicial Appointments Commission, https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk
Judicial Conduct Investigations Office, https://complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk
The Law Society, https://www.lawsociety.org.uk
Official UK legislation website, https://www.legislation.gov.uk
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, https://www.unodc.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gdańsk Legal Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Academic Scientific Journals
