Federal variety versus harmonisation: Recent monument legislation in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2021.2.12Keywords:
monument authorities, monument preservation, monument protection, UNESCO World Heritage ListAbstract
Due to the division of powers between the Federation and the German states anchored in the Basic Law, German monument legislation is currently still fragmented. As the concept of a monument, administrative procedures, the status of UNESCO World Heritage sites, and possible sanctions in the event of offences against protected property are governed differently in sixteen monument protection laws, the question arises how to harmonise administrative practice.
Downloads
References
Davydov D., “The State Monument Council: The Institutionalisation of Public Participation in Monument Law”, Denkmalpflege in Westfalen-Lippe 2016, no. 1.
Davydov D., “Too Close to Present Time? The Time Limit as a Requirement of the Term Monument” [in:] Monument Preservation as a Cultural Practice, ed. Monument Preservation Office of Lower Saxony, Hannover 2018.
Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media, Key aspects of the new Act on the Protection of Cultural Property in Germany, Berlin 2016.
Sauerländer W., “Extension of the concept of monument?”, Die Denkmalpflege 1975, no. 1/2. Spennemann J., “Monument Protection as Application of National Law Relating to the Environment”, Natur und Recht 2020, no. 4.
Viebrock J., “Monument Preservation Services” [in:] Martin/Krautzberger. Manual for Monument Protection and Monument Preservation, eds. D. Davydov, J. Spennemann, Munich 2017.
Academic Scientific Journals
