Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweTransnarodowa, usieciowiona władza i kwestia jej podstawności
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2022.4.01Słowa kluczowe:
analiza sieciowa, autorytet relacyjny, usieciowienie, podstawność władzy, globalne zarządzanieAbstrakt
Struktura globalnego systemu władzy uległa w ostatnich latach znaczącym zmianom. System, w którym kluczową rolę odgrywały dotąd instytucje międzyrządowe i traktaty wielostronne przekształcił się w obszar hybrydowy, na którym wiele instytucji publicznych, prywatnych i półpublicznych wzajemnie na siebie oddziałuje na różne sposoby. W artykule skupiono się na coraz ważniejszej roli prywatnych transnarodowych reżimów regulacyjnych (PTR). Autorytet PTR wynika z ich osadzenia w gęstej sieci powiązań z innymi PTR. Model władzy usieciowionej podważa ortodoksyjny, hierarchiczny pogląd na władzę legalną i wnosi wkład do bardziej ogólnej debaty filozoficznej dotyczącej podstaw (źródeł, podstawności) władzy.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Abbott K.W. et al., “Competence versus Control: the Governor’s Dilemma”, Regulation & Gover-nance 2019, vol. 14, issue 4.
Albrecht K.Y., “Conditions, Fictions and the Basic Norm”, The American Journal of Jurisprudence2021, vol. 66, issue 2.
Baccini A., Marroni L., “Regulation of Interlocking Directorates in the Financial Sector: a Comparative Case Study”, European Journal of Law and Economics 2016, vol. 41.
Barasa E. et al., “What is Resilience and How Can it be Nurtured? A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature on Organizational Resilience”, International Journal of Health Policy and Manage-ment 2018, vol. 7.
Bartley T., “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions”, American Journal of Sociology 2007, vol. 113, no. 2.
Bedi P., Sharma C., “Community Detection in Social Networks”, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2016, vol. 6, issue 3.
Bennett K., Making Things Up, Oxford University Press 2017.
Black J., “‘Says Who?’ Liquid Authority and Interpretive Control in Transnational Regulatory Regimes”, International Theory 2017, vol. 9, issue 2.
Bliss R., “Viciousness and Circles of Ground”, Metaphilosophy 2014, vol. 45.
Bliss R., “Grounding and reflexivity” [in:] Reality and its structure: Essays in fundamentality, R. Bliss, G. Priest (eds), Oxford University Press 2018.
Borgatti S., Everett M., Johnson J., Analyzing Social Networks, Sage Publications 2018.
Bromley D.W., “Property relations and economic development: the other land reform”, World Development 1989, vol. 17.
Burchardt D., “The concept of legal space: A topological approach to addressing multiple legalities, Global Constitutionalism 2022 (First view).
Carpentier M., “Sources and Validity” [in:] Legal Validity and Soft Law, P. Westerman et al. (eds), Springer 2018.
Chilovi S., Pavlakos G., “Law-determination as Grounding: A Common Grounding Framework for Jurisprudence”, Legal Theory 2019, vol. 25.
Corning P., “The re‐emergence of ‘emergence’: A venerable concept in search of a theory”, Complexity 2002, vol. 7.
Corning P., Nature’s Magic: Synergy in Evolution and the Fate of Humankind, Cambridge University Press 2003.
Corning P., Holistic Darwinism: Synergy, Cybernetics, and the Bioeconomics of Evolution, The University of Chicago Press 2010.
Corning P., “The Re-Emergence of Emergence, and the Causal Role of Synergy in Emergent Evolution”, Synthese 2012, vol. 185.
Culver K.C., Giudice M., Legality’s Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence, Oxford University Press 2010.
Dickison M., Magnani M., Rossi L., Multilayer Social Networks, Cambridge University Press 2016.
Dixon T.S., “What is the well-foundedness of Grounding?”, Mind 2016, vol. 125.
Dixon S., “Infinite Descent” [in:] The Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Groundin, M. Raven (ed.), Routledge 2020.
Freeman L., The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Empirical Press 2004.
Gabora L., Aerts D., “Evolution as Context-Driven Actualisation of Potential: Toward an Interdisciplinary Theory of Change of State”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 2005, vol. 30.
Gardner J., Law as a leap of faith: essays on law in general, Oxford University Press 2012.
Giannotti J., “Fundamental Yet Grounded”, Theoria 2021, vol. 87.
Goldstein J., “Emergence as a Construct: History and Issues”, Emergence 1999, vol. 1.
Gostin L.O., Moon S., Meier B.M., “Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of COVID-19”, American Journal of Public Health 2020, vol. 110, issue 11.
Groffman P.M., Baron J.S., Blett T. et al., “Ecological Thresholds: The Key to Successful Environmental Management or an Important Concept with No Practical Application?”, Ecosystems 2006, vol. 9.
Hage J., “What is Legal Validity? Lessons from Soft Law” [in:] Legal Validity and Soft Law, P. Wester-man et al. (eds), Springer 2018.
Hale T., “Transnational Actors and Transnational Governance in Global Environmental Politics”, Annual Review of Political Science 2020, vol. 23.
Hale T., Held D., Young K., Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most,Wiley 2013.
Kelsen H., Pure Theory of Law,University of California Press 1967.
Kovacs D., “What is wrong with self-grounding?”, Erkenntnis 2018, vol. 83.
Krisch N., “Entangled legalities in the postnational space”, International Journal of Constitutional Law 2022, vol. 20.
Marciano A., “Introduction: Constitutional Myths” [in:] Constitutional Mythologies: New Perspecti-ves on Controlling the State, idem (ed.), Springer 2011.
Mayer B., “Climate Change Mitigation as an Obligation Under Human Rights Treaties?”, American Journal of International Law 2021, vol. 115.
Oberle T., “Metaphysical Foundationalism: Consensus and Controversy”, American Philosophical Quarterly 2022, vol. 59.
Pauwelyn J., Wessel R.A., Wouters J., “When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking”, European Journal of International Law 2014, vol. 25, issue 3.
Perez O., “Courage, regulatory responsibility, and the challenge of higher‐order reflexivity”, Regulation & Governance 2014, vol. 8.
Perez O., Stegmann O., “Transnational networked constitutionalism”, Journal of Law and Society 2018, vol. 45.
Perez O. et al., “The Network of Law Reviews: Citation Cartels, Scientific Communities, and Jour-nal Rankings”, The Modern Law Review 2019, vol. 82.
Perez O., “Transnational networked authority”, Leiden Journal of International Law 2022, vol. 35, issue 2.
Prokopenko M., “Design Versus Self-Organization” [in:] Advances in Applied Self-Organizing Sys-tems, idem (ed.) Springer 2013.
Rand W., Wilensky U., “An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with netlogo”, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press 2015.
Raz J., “The Problem of Authority: Revisiting the Service Conception”, Minnesota Law Review2006, vol. 90.
Ricoeur P., The Course of Recognition, Harvard University Press 2005.
Roughan N. Halpin A., “The Promises and Pursuits of Pluralist Jurisprudence” [in:] In Pursuit of Pluralist Jurisprudence, eidem (eds), Cambridge University Press 2017.
Schauer F., The Force of Law, Harvard University Press 2015.
Searle J., “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”, Language in Society 1976, vol. 5, no. 1.
Searle J., Making the Social World: the Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford University Press 2010.
Stoddard I. et al., “Three decades of climate mitigation: why haven’t we bent the global emissions curve?”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2021, vol. 46.
Streck C., “Filling in for Governments? The Role of the Private Actors in the International Climate Regime”, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 2020, vol. 17.
Tahko T.E., “Fundamentality” [in:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta (ed.), Fall 2018 Edition.
Teubner G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford University Press 2012.
Thompson N., “Metaphysical Interdependence” [in:] Reality making, M. Jago (ed.), Oxford University Press 2016.
Thompson N., “Metaphysical interdependence, epistemic coherentism, and holistic explanation”, [in:] Reality and its Structure: Essays in Fundamentality, R. Bliss, G. Priest (eds), Oxford University Press 2018.
Ward I., “Mythologies of English Constitutionalism”, King’s Law Journal 2004, vol. 15.
Wood S. et al., “The Interactive Dynamics of Transnational Business Governance: A Challenge for Transnational Legal Theory”, Transnational Legal Theory 2015, vol. 6.
