Uniwersyteckie Czasopisma NaukoweEwolucja religii. Podejście syntetyczne
Słowa kluczowe:
socjologia religii, ewolucja religii, darwinizm, teoria systemu, Herbert SpencerAbstrakt
Zaproponowane w artykule podejście do ewolucji religii usiłuje przezwyciężyć słabości ewolucjonizmu zarówno socjokulturowego, jak i selekcjonistycznego. Jest to próba syntezy podejścia darwinowskiego z teorią systemów Herberta Spencera oraz socjologiczną ekologią organizacji. Pozwala nie tylko na analizę powstania i ewolucji poszczególnych organizacji religijnych uwarunkowanej siłami społecznymi, ale także umożliwia poznanie mechanizmów opierania się tym siłom.
Downloads
Bibliografia
Atran S., 2002, In Gods We Trust. The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellah R.N., 1964, Religious Evolution, “American Sociological Review”, vol. 29, issue 3.
Bellah R.N., 2011, Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Bering J.M., 2002, Intuitive Conceptions of Dead Agents’ Minds: The Natural Foundations of Afterlife Beliefs as Phenomenological Boundary, “Journal of Cognition and Culture”, vol. 2, no. 4.
Bering J.M., 2003, Religious Concepts are Probably Epiphenomena: A Reply to Pyysiäinen, Boyer, and Barrett, “Journal of Cognition and Culture”, vol. 3.
Bering J.M., 2006, The Cognitive Psychology of Belief in the Supernatural, “American Scientist”, vol. 94, no. 2.
Blackmore S., 1999, The Meme Machine. With a Foreword by Richard Dawkins, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bloch M., 2000, A Well-Disposed Social Anthropologist’s Problem with Memes [in:] R. Aunger (ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boyer P., 2001, Religion Explained. The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Brodie R., 2009, Virus of the Mind. The New Science of the Meme, Padstow: Hay House.
Buss D.M., 2008, Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, Boston–New York–San Francisco: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cavalli-Sforza L.L., 2001, Genes, Peoples and Languages, London: Penguin.
Corning P.A., 1982, Durkheim and Spencer, “British Journal of Sociology”, vol. 33, no. 3 (Sep.).
Dawkins R., 2006a, The God Delusion, London: Bantam Press.
Dawkins R., 2006b, The Selfish Gene. 30th Anniversary Edition, Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
Dennett D.C., 2006, Breaking the Spell. Religion as a Natural Phenomenon, New York: Penguin.
Distin K., 2005, The Selfish Meme. A Critical Reassessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Durkheim É., 1982, The Rules of Sociological Method, New York–London–Toronto–Sydney: The Free Press.
Durkheim É., 2005, Suicide. A Study in Sociology, London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Ehrman B.D., 2005, Misquoting Jesus The Story Behind Who Changed The Bible And Why, Toronto–London–New York: HarperCollins e-books.
Ehrman B.D., Metzger B.M., 2005, The Text Of The New Testament Its Transmission, Cor-ruption, And Restoration. 4th Edition, New York–Oxford: Oxford University Press, New York.
Fracchia J., Lewontin R.C., 1999, Does Culture Evolve?, “History and Theory”, vol. 38, issue 4, December.
Fracchia J., Lewontin R.C., 2005, The Price of Metaphor, “History and Theory”, vol. 44, issue 1, February.
Godfrey-Smith P., 2000, On the Theoretical Role of ‘Genetic Coding’, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 67.
Gould S.J., 2002, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge MA–London: Harvard University Press.
Griffiths P.E., 2001, Genetic Information: A Metaphor In Search of a Theory, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 68, no. 3.
Hannan M.T., Freeman J., 1977, The Population Ecology of Organizations, “American Journal of Sociology”, vol. 82, no. 5.
Hannan M.T., Pólos L., Carroll G.R., 2004, The Evolution of Inertia, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, vol. 13, no. 1.
Jablonka E., 2002, Information: Its Interpretation, Its Inheritance, and Its Sharing, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 69, no. 4, December.
Kuper A., 2000, If Memes Are the Answer, What is the Question? [in:] R. Aunger (ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lenski G., 2005, Ecological-Evolutionary Theory. Principles and Applications, Boulder–London: Paradigm Publishers.
Lynch A., 1996, Thought Contagion How Belief Spreads Through Society, New York: Basic Books, Inc., Publishers.
Margul T., 1983, Jak umierały religie, Warszawa: KiW.
Mayr E., 1996, What Is a Species, and What Is Not?, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 63, June.
Merton R.K., 1967, On Theoretical Sociology. Five Essays, Old and New, New York: The Free Press.
Oyama S., 1985, The Ontogeny of Information, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oyama S., 2000, Evolution’s Eye. A Systems View of the Biology-Culture Divide, Durham–London: Duke University Press.
Pyysiäinen I., 2003, On the ‘Innateness’ of Religion: A Comment on Bering, “Journal of Cognition and Culture”, vol. 3, no. 3.
Radcliffe-Brown A.R., 1952, Structure and Function in Primitive Society, Essays and Addresses, Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.
Richerson P.J., Boyd R., 2005, Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Rossano M.J., 2010, Supernatural Selection. How Religion Evolved, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Runciman W.G., 1989, A Treatise On Social Theory. Volume II: Substantive Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Runciman W.G., 2004, The Diffusion of Christianity in the Third Century AD as a Case-Study in the Theory of Cultural Selection, “European Journal of Sociology”, vol. 45.
Runciman W.G., 2009, The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanderson S.K., 2001, The Evolution of Human Sociality: A Darwinian Conflict Perspective, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Sanderson S.K., 2008, Darwinian Conflict Theory and Evolutionary Sociology [in:] J. Heinz-Niedenzu Jurgen, T. Meleghy, P. Meyer Peter (eds.), 2011, The New Evolutionary Social Science: Human Nature, Social Behavior, and Social Change, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Scheler M., 1980, Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Sober E., 2000, Philosophy of Biology, Boulder: Westview Press.
Spencer H., 1872, The Principles of Biology. Vol. I, New York: D. Appleton And Company.
Spencer H., 1900, The Principles of Sociology. Vol. II, New York: D. Appleton And Company.
Spencer H., 1906, Study of Sociology, New York: D. Appleton And Company.
Spencer H., 1912, The Principles of Sociology. Vol. I, New York: D. Appleton And Company.
Sperber D., 2000, An Objection to the Memetic Approach to Culture [in:] R. Aunger (ed.), Darwinizing Culture: The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sterelny K., 2000, The ‘Genetic Program’ Program: A Commentary on Maynard Smith on Information in Biology, “Philosophy of Science”, vol. 67, issue 2.
Turner J.H., Maryanski A.R., 1988, Is ‘Neofunctionalism’ Really Functional?, “Sociological Theory”, vol. 6, no. 1, Spring.
White L.A., 1959, The Evolution of Culture; The Development of Civilization to the Fall of Rome, New York–Toronto–London: McGaw-Hill Book Company.
Wilson D.S., 2003, Darwin’s Cathedral. Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society, Chicago–London: The University of Chicago Press.
Wunn I., 2002, Die Evolution der Religionen, Hannover: Univ., Fakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften.
Wunn I., 2003, The Evolution of Religions, “Numen: International Review for the History of Religions”, vol. 50, issue 4.
