Academic Scientific JournalsWhen the first language feels like a second language: Challenges for learners of Norwegian Nynorsk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2019.1.07Keywords:
language teaching, language learning, language acquisition, language didactics, language politics, identity, investment, motivation, social power, Norton, NynorskAbstract
Norway has two official written language varieties: Bokmål (DanoNorwegian) and Nynorsk (New Norwegian). Normally, all Norwegian pupils must learn both varieties of the written Norwegian language in school, and at the end of secondary school, they obtain two separate grades in written Norwegian. However, one of the varieties is considered to be and is taught as the main written language, whereas the other variety is the second or alternative written language.
Approximately 85 percent of the pupils in school have the DanoNorwegian variety as their main written language and many of these pupils develop antipathies toward the other variety with the result that they do not master it very well at the end of secondary school. In fact, many pupils achieve better results in English than in the alternative variety of their own so-called mother tongue.
In this paper, I will discuss some of the challenges that are related to learning Nynorsk in the Norwegian educational system and society. With reference to Norton (2013) and others, I will argue that these challenges may actually be best understood from the perspectives of identity, social power, motivation, investment and second language acquisition.
Downloads
References
Cambridge Dictionary. Available at https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/.
Darvin, R., B. Norton (2016). “Investment and language learning in the 21st century”. Langage et société 157/3: 19-38.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). “The L2 motivational self system”. In: Z. Dörnyei, E. Ushioda (eds.). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol – Buffalo – Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
ERL 1 (2016) – First International Pedagogical and Linguistic Conference “Educational Role of Language: Learn to speak, speak to learn”, University of Gdansk, Poland 2016, 9-10 June, 2016.Available at http://www.educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/1stconf-programme-0. Accessed19.01.2019.
ERL 3 (2018) – Third International Pedagogic and Linguistic ERL Conference – “Educational Role of Language – How do we understand it?” Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania, June 14-15, 2018. Available at http://educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/sites/default/files/ERL-III-VilniusConference-programme-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 19.01.2019.
ERL research. Available at http://educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/erl-research. Accessed 19.01.2019.
Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to Language. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grepstad, O. (2015). Språkfakta 2015. Ei forteljing om språk i Noreg og verda gjennom 850 tabellar. Ørsta: Nynorsk kultursentrum.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
Haugan, J. (2016). “L1, L2 and the case of Norway’s written language diversity: How do Norwegian schoolchildren reflect on the social and cultural linguistic world around them?”. Paper presented at ERL 1 – Educational Role of Language, Gdansk, June 2016.
Haugan, J. (2017). “Language diversity in Norway and the question of L1 and L2”. Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 14/1: 181-204.
Haugan, J. (2018a). “Norwegian Nynorsk – How to write student papers in a variety of your mother tongue that you actually dislike”. Paper presented at ERL 3 – “Educational Role of Language”, Vilnius, June 2018.
Haugan, J. (2018b). “The importance of formal grammar skills: Reflections on Polish students learning Norwegian”. Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 15/1: 107-132.
Haugen, E. (1965). “Construction and reconstruction in language planning: Ivar Aasen’s grammar”. Word 21/2: 188-207.
Heller, M. (1987). “The role of language in the formation of ethnic identity”. In: J. Phinney, M. Rotheram (eds.). Children’s Ethnic Socialization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 180-200.
Læreplan i norsk (NOR1-05) (National curriculum for Norwegian as a school subject). Available at https://www.udir.no/kl06/NOR1-05. Accessed 19.01.2019.
Nordal Steinsvik, A. (2004). Nynorsk i bokmålsland: ei gransking av undervisningspraksis og haldningar til nynorsk som sidemål i ungdomsskulen i Bærum. Arbeidsrapport. Høgskulen i Volda.
Nordhagen, J. (2006). Nynorsk som sidemål i skolen – en undersøkelse av allmennlærerstudenters personlige og yrkesprofesjonelle holdninger. Hovudoppgåve, Universitetet i Oslo. Master’s thesis.
Norsk språkforening. Available at http://norsk.atspace.com/.
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. 2nd edition. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Peirce, B. N. (1995). “Social identity, investment, and language learning”. TESOL Quarterly 29/1: 9-31.
Schaffar B., Uljens M. (2015). “Paradoxical tensions between Bildung and Ausbildung in academia”. In: E. Westergaard, J. S. Wiewiura (eds.). On the Facilitation of the Academy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 1-15.
Schmidt, W. H., C. C. McKnight, R. T. Houang, H. C. Wang, D. E. Wiley, L. S. Cogan, et al. (2001). Why Schools Matter: A Cross-national Comparison of Curriculum and Learning. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Udir.no. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Available at https://www.udir.no/in-english/. Accessed 19.01.2019.
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Sixth edition. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
