Nynorsk and the L2 self

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.1.05

Keywords:

language teaching, language learning, language acquisition, language didactics, language politics, identity, investment, motivation, social power, Nynorsk

Abstract

As part of an ongoing project (Educational Role of Language), this paper continues the quest (Haugan 2019b) for finding approaches to second language acquisition that might help understand the challenges for Norwegian pupils/students when trying to learn the alternative written language Nynorsk, in order to develop better teaching didactics.

Norway has two official written language varieties: Bokmål (Dano-Norwegian) and Nynorsk (New Norwegian). Normally, all Norwegian students must learn both varieties of the written Norwegian language in school, and at the end of secondary school, they obtain two separate grades in written Norwegian. However, one of the varieties is considered and taught as the main written language, whereas the other variety is the second or alternative written language.

Approximately 85 percent of the pupils in school have the DanoNorwegian variety as their main written language and many of these pupils develop antipathies against the other variety with the result that they do not master it very well at the end of secondary school. In fact, many pupils achieve better results in English than in the alternative variety of their own so-called mother tongue.

In this paper, I will investigate the approach of Dörnyei (2009), i.e. a motivation-oriented theory of second language learning, and adapt it to learning Norwegian Nynorsk as an alternative written language. According to motivation-oriented L2 approaches, the notion of a L2 self or identity is an important part in trying to acquire/learn a second language. I will claim that this part of language learning is crucial in the understanding of the challenges connected with learning Norwegian Nynorsk as an alternative language. Most language learners would be more motivated to acquire a second language than trying to have a second identity connected to a variety of the same language.

Since the content of this paper is a continuation and extension of the previous work in the same research project and network and I consider the general background crucial for the argumentation, certain parts of the presentation are borrowed or adapted from Haugan (2019b).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boyatzis, R. E., K. Akrivou (2006). “The ideal self as the driver of intentional change”. Journal of Management Development 25/7: 624-642.

Cambridge Dictionary. Available at <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/>.

Carver, C. C., S. L. Reynolds, M. F. Scheier (1994). “The possible selves of optimists and pessimists”. Journal of Research in Personality 28: 133-141.

Darvin, R., B. Norton (2016). “Investment and language learning in the 21st century”. Langage et Société 157/3: 19-38.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Larence Erlbaum.

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). “The L2 motivational self system”. In: Z. Dörnyei, E. Ushioda (eds.). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 9-42.

Cantor, N. (1990). “From thought to behaviour: ’Having’ and ‘doing’ in the study of personality and cognition”. American Psychologist 45/6: 735-750.

ERL 1 (2016) – First International Pedagogical and Linguistic Conference “Educational Role of Language. Learn to speak, speak to learn”, University of Gdansk, Poland 2016, 9-10 June, 2016. Available at <http://www.educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/ 1st-conf-programme-0>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

ERL 3 (2018) – Third International Pedagogic and Linguistic ERL Conference – “Educational Role of Language – How do we understand it?” Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania, June 14-15, 2018. Available at <http://educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/sites/default/files/ERL-III-Vilnius-Conference-programme-FINAL.pdf>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

ERL 4 (2019) – Fourth International Pedagogical and Linguistic Conference “Educational Role of Language. Learn to speak, speak to learn”, University of Craiova, Romania 2019, 17-18 June, 2019. Available at <http://educationalroleoflanguage.ug.edu.pl/sites/default/files/ERL-IV-Craiova-Conference-programme.pdf>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

ERL research. Available at <http://educationalroleoflanguage.ug. edu.pl/erl-research>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to Language: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grepstad, O. (2015). Språkfakta 2015. Ei forteljing om språk i Noregog verda gjennom 850 tabellar. Ørsta: Nynorsk kultursentrum.

Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.

Haugan, J. (2016). “L1, L2 and the case of Norway’s written language diversity. How do Norwegian schoolchildren reflect on the social and cultural linguistic world around them?”. Paper presented at ERL 1 – Educational Role of Language, Gdansk, June 2016.

Haugan, J. (2017). “Language diversity in Norway and the question of L1 and L2”. Beyond Philology. An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 14/1: 181-204.

Haugan, J. (2018a). “Norwegian Nynorsk – How to write student papers in a variety of your mother tongue that you actually dislike”. Paper presented at ERL 3 – Educational Role of Language, Vilnius, Lithuania, June 2018.

Haugan, J. (2018b). “The importance of formal grammar skills: Reflections on Polish students learning Norwegian”. Beyond Philology: An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching 15/1: 107-132.

Haugan, J. (2019a). “The L2 Self as a challenge in the educational system – seen from the perspective of Norwegian Nynorsk”. Paper presented at ERL 4 – Educational Role of Language, Craiova, Romania, June 2019.

Haugan, J. (2019b). “When the first languages feels like a second language: Challenges for learners of Norwegian Nynorsk”. Beyond Philology 16/1: 141-164.

Haugen, E. (1965). “Construction and reconstruction in language planning: Ivar Aasen’s grammar”. Word 21/2: 188-207.

Heller, M. (1987). “The role of language in the formation of ethnic identity”. In: J. Phinney, M. Rotheram, (eds.). Children’s Ethnic Socialization. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 180-200.

Higgins, E. T. (1987). “Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect”. Psychological Review 94: 319-340.

Higgins, E. T. (1996). “The ‘self-digest’: Self-knowledge serving selfregulatory functions”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71/6: 1062-1083.

Higgins, E. T. (1998). “Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 30: 1-46.

Hoyle, R. H., M. R. Sherrill (2006). “Future orientation in the selfsystem: Possible selves, self-regulation, and behaviour”. Journal of Personality 74/6: 1673-1696.

Læreplan i norsk (NOR1-05) ((previous) National curriculum for Norwegian as a school subject, until 2020). Available at <https://www.udir.no/kl06/NOR1-05>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

Læreplan i norsk (NOR01-06) (National curriculum for Norwegian as a school subject, from 2020). Available at <https://www.udir.no/lk20/nor01-06>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

Læreplanverket (2020) (Norwegian national curriculum), Utdanningsdirektoratet (Udir). Available at <https://www.udir.no/lk20/>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

Markus, H. R., P. Nurius (1986). “Possible selves: Personalized representations of goals”. American Psychologist 41: 954-969.

Markus, H. R., A. Ruvolo (1989). “Possible selves: Personalized representations of goals”. In: L. A. Pervin (ed.). Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 211-241.

Markus, H. R. (2006). “Foreword”. In: C. Dunkel, J. Kerpelman (eds). Possible Selves: Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Nova Science, xi-xiv.

Nordal, A. S. (2004). Nynorsk i bokmålsland: ei gransking av undervisningspraksis og haldningar til nynorsk som sidemål i ungdomsskulen i Bærum. Arbeidsrapport. Høgskulen i Volda.

Nordhagen, J. (2006). Nynorsk som sidemål i skolen – en undersøkelse av allmennlærerstudenters personlige og yrkesprofesjonelle holdninger. Hovudoppgåve, Universitetet i Oslo. Master’s thesis.

Norsk språkforening. Available at <http://norsk.atspace.com/>.

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. 2nd edition. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters.

Oyserman, D., H. R. Markus (1990). “Possible selves and delinquency”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 112-125.

Oyserman, D., K. Terry, D. Bybee (2002). “A possible selves intervention to enhance school involvement”. Journal of Adolescence 25: 313-326.

Peirce, B. N. (1995). “Social identity, investment, and language learning”. TESOL Quarterly 29/1: 9-31.

Pizzolato, J. E. (2006). “Achieving college student possible selves: Navigating the space between commitment and achievement of long-term identity goals”. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 12/1: 57-69.

Ruvolo, A. P., H. R. Markus (1992). “Possible selves and performance: The power of self-relevant imagery”. Social Cognition 10/1: 95-124.

Schaffar, B., M. Uljens (2015). “Paradoxical tensions between Bildung and Ausbildung in academia”. In: E. Westergaard, J. S. Wiewiura (eds.). On the Facilitation of the Academy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 1-15.

Schmidt, W. H., C. C. McKnight, R. T. Houang, H. C. Wang, D. E. Wiley, L. S. Cogan et al. (2001). Why Schools Matter: A CrossNational Comparison of Curriculum and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Segal, H. G. (2006). “Possible selves, fantasy distortion, and the anticipated life history: Exploring the role of imagination in social cognition”. In: C. Dunkel, J. Kerpelman (eds.). Possibles Selves: Theory, Research and Applications. New York: Nova Science, 79-96.

Udir.no. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Available at <https://www.udir.no/in-english/>. Accessed 30.01.2020.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Walton, S. (2015). “Kva er nynorsken?”. In: H. Eiksund, J. O. Fretland (eds.). Nye røyster i nynorskforskinga. Oslo: Samlaget, 16-33.

Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Sixth edition. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2020-02-18

How to Cite

Haugan, J. (2020). Nynorsk and the L2 self. Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching, (17/1), 126–157. https://doi.org/10.26881/bp.2020.1.05

Issue

Section

Articles